The volume this file occupies should not distract the visitor from the essentials. Here, in a few questions and answers, is a short summary, also existing as a pdf document of one page in A4 format (to print and distribute...). You also have a pdf document biographical double A4 page showing how Jean-Michel became Brigitte. The conclusion of chapter 31 is more detailed, with links to the other chapters and to the appendices. Five months of citizen inquiry littered with red herrings and hesitations lead to a new understanding. Here are the answers that we believe are best in the state of our knowledge at the end of August 2022.
|
Alain Beyrand (alain [at] pressibus.org)
with the help of Lionel Labosse (site), Hortense Fuschia, Jean Doux and about fifteen anonymous contributors.
File started January 13, 2022, made public January 17 with the first 15 chapters,
first finalized (version 1.0) on January 24 with 22 chapters.
Photo top and bottom Stephane Lemouton, Closer.
Clicking on the thick-bordered illustrations will enlarge them.
|
![]() | Clicking on this image takes you to my tree on geneanet with all its links.
On the left, due to the usual 100 year confidentiality, the branch stops at Jean Trogneux, Jean-Michel's grandfather. The common ancestor Jeanne des Essarts, sister of a mayor of Rouen, had as her brother-in-law the famous Etienne Marcel (1315-1358) (page Wikipedia and his equestrian statue in the vicinity of the Paris City Hall). ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() Already a family lie... On the left Jean-Michel's great-grandfather was not named Jean-Baptiste but Marc (tree on the Roglo base, his birth certificate). Marc's great-grandfather Trogneux was named Jean-Baptiste, so one can assume that the desire to show a lineage of Jean caused the two names to be reversed. This is not insignificant, it is the origin of the store. Jean, born in 1881, Jean-Michel's grandfather, Jean his father, Jean-Claude his older brother and Jean Alexandre his nephew follow. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stores in Amiens, Arras, Saint Quentin, Lille and Le Touquet (link) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Contested are: his gender, date of birth, first marriage and spouse, and divorce. He would not be the mother of his three children but their father (see below). On the right, a teacher or a teacher ?
|
![]() |
July 24, 2022: In this page Natacha Rey launches a subscription for support and book publication.
August 1. The Elysée is not without reaction to the arguments of Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard. In this country that claims to be very attached to press freedom, Natacha Rey is the subject of two complaints (Appendix D 7 and Appendix D 18), while Xavier Poussard is the subject of a complaint (about a 5-year-old publication, the Dar Olfa affair) and his bank accounts have been closed. He talks about it in the just published issue 507 of F&D, opposite. This "undoubtedly originated in our unassailable investigation of Brigitte Macron." We look forward to a future issue featuring new revelations about Brigittegate... |
![]() |
![]() [Getty Images] |
It is strange that the date of birth of "Brigitte" was only made public in May 2016 with the publication, in the short-lived magazine "Pop Story", of a long investigation by Sylvie Bommel entitled "And Brigitte created Macron".In the Macronian gesture, "April 13" corresponds to the death of Manette [Emmanuel's maternal grandmother] that occurred three years before "Brigitte's" birth date was given. In the story, April 13, 1953 is the date of the launch of MK-Ultra, the infamous CIA mind control program. |
![]() | ![]() See also the end of the Chapter 9 and the Appendix A 36 |
![]() ![]() After the broadcast of "Brigitte Macron, a French novel" which incidentally revealed the physical existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux, Natacha Rey posted, on the same platform, this more than disturbing assemblage putting side by side the current "Brigitte" and "Jean-Michel" at the dawn of adolescence. |
![]() | The 2018 France 3 TV movie "Brigitte Macron, un roman français" shows this photo featuring Brigitte and her first husband André-Louis. This is actually Claude Hugot, a fellow teacher. Then there was a fake tweet the same year, using this photo, reuniting husband, wife and lover (Emmanuel at 12) (article). And a fake interview with Andre-Louis, actually a hoax (article)... And in 2020, Brigitte mourns her first husband (opposite, link)... |
![]() |
Anne Fulda, author of the book "Emmanuel Macron, a young man so perfect", had written this when talking about Brigitte Macron: "She mentions little André-Louis Auzière, her banker ex-husband. By modesty, discretion. Because there are things she does not want, can not say?" In 2017, during the presidential election, international journalists had tried to interview André Louis Auzière, in vain. In an article in Gala magazine entitled "As if he had never existed !", we can read a passage by the author Sylvie Bommel: "passioned by this enigmatic man, the English journalists searched everywhere, without finding anything." (link)
The journalist who investigated André-Louis Auzière the most is undoubtedly Sylvie Bommel. Charged with laying down the "official legend" in her river article "Et Brigitte créa Macron" published in Pop Story in May 2016, she wrote that after Emmanuel's arrival in "Brigitte's" life, "he was not seen again in Amiens, he was assumed to have gone to Paris, but in truth no one knew anything about it. Wiped out, erased. As if he had not existed. To the point of not wanting to meet his ex-family-in-law at his mother's funeral". She will launch in spite of everything in his search, a game of track which will constitute the essential of "He had just been 17 years old", his second investigation published in 2019. In vain... [F&D501p9] |
![]() | ![]() ![]() |
![]() | "This is a man who does not want to be found after what happened. It was a terrible shock to him to have his wife leave him for someone so young," a source said. He then reportedly cut ties with everyone except his children. He reportedly hasn't given any more life signs (link) |
Having become our correspondent for this investigation, Natacha Rey contacted, last June 22 [2021], Catherine Audoy (from the professional contact given by the interested party on the Internet) in order to present her with the multiple inconsistencies nestled in Brigitte's "green years".
If the answer never came, the result was immediate since in the wake, on July 13, 2021, Natacha Rey saw the gendarmerie bursting into her home. She was taken into custody (without being summoned) on the pretext of a complaint filed by Catherine Audoy with the public prosecutor of Lisieux (where Jean-Louis Auzière officiates as a legal conciliator). Our correspondent was released after five hours of tough interrogation, with a moral lesson, humiliations and threats of all kinds. She was asked for the list of journalists with whom she had been in contact (we were not the only ones) and her phone was seized. Had Natacha Rey touched the sensitive nerve by simply exposing the physical similarity between Jean-Michel Trogneux and the current "first lady" and by demonstrating the impossibility that Jean-Louis Auzière was the cousin of an unlikely André-Louis Auzière first husband of "Brigitte" ? |
![]()
![]() |
Strangely these last few days, I was contacted by several people, whose either math teacher neighbor in Amiens, or daughter or son knew Brigitte Macron well from the time when " she " was a teacher. Some people, incredulous, tried to defend her and accused me, without even having read the investigation, of spreading rumors or false information and of trying to harm her. However, it turns out that ALL of them, without exception, spoke to me about a Madame Trogneux and not a Madame Auzière, even though she is supposed to have taught under only two names: Madame Auzière until 2006 and Madame Macron from 2007.
Refer to the first issues of Faits & Documents devoted to the "Mystère Brigitte Macron", where this name problem is mentioned [F&D503p3], since journalists who interviewed witnesses at the time also called her Madame Trogneux "at the time of the scandal caused by her affair with the young student Emmanuel. Without knowing it, these people did me a favor by bringing water to my mill, confirming, if it were needed, the credibility of my thesis. |
Would Jean-Michel Trogneux have started a family with Catherine Audoy? Did Jean-Michel Trogneux suffer from the psychiatric disorder known as gender dysphoria ? Would he have resorted, late in life, to a GRS (Gender Reassignment Surgery) MTF (Male-to-Female) operation? After his "gender reassignment", would he have chosen Brigitte as his first name ? "Brigitte" and Jean-Michel Trogneux are they one and the same person ? To what "vital choice" does "Brigitte" refer in "Elle" (August 18, 2017) ? It is indeed hard to believe that it is a "simple" divorce when you read :"I know I hurt my children, and that is the thing I blame myself for most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was." |
The scenario could look like this:
|
![]() |
A Trogneux has so far gone completely under the radar (no mention in the press and on genealogical sites), Jean-Jacques Trogneux was born in November 1982. A birth announcement is available in the archives of the Courrier Picard of the BNF (with the problems that this source poses as we have shown). On the date of November 15, 1982 is announced the birth of Jean-Jacques Trogneux, son of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Madame, née Véronique Dreux. |
If the hypothesis of the genealogy of Jean-Michel Trogneux in the 70s / 80s may seem complex, it could be explained by a simple double life (he would not be the first), favored most often by compatible professional activities (commercial kind) ... before his gender dysphoria which, we can easily understand, would have exploded in full flight his conjugal liaisons
Brigitte's biography is clearly false... she can't get 2150 € of retirement pension (source L'Obs in 2017 tax declaration of the Macron's, 17.200 € received between January and August 2016) for an incomplete career, knowing that in the private sector it is calculated on the 25 best years and represents at best 65% of the net salary, or a teacher who moreover is not certified couldn't have an average income of 3.000 € / month for 25 years. With only 31 years of professional activities in her biography even adding 4 quarters per child (3 children or 5?), the discount is severe... [details, article] |
![]() ![]() ![]() Astoning remarks of all kinds from 2020 and July 2022: "After McKinsey, Rothschild and Alstom, among many other deals sensitive, here come the "UberFiles." A new political-economic scandal whose facts date back to 2015" (link). |
2017, Brigitte Macron (72 years old) moved into the Elysée Palace. Some among our subscribers, wonder about the difference in age of eight years that induces the transsexual hypothesis and its implication on the physique of "Brigitte". Without even addressing the difference in skin aging between men and women and without detailing what currently allows cosmetic surgery, a simple comparison with Amanda Lear (born Alain Tapp probably in 1939) or with the singer and trans woman Marie-France (born February 9, 1946) can sweep away the objection on the physical / age relationship. |
Similar wigs, some might think the singer Iggy Pop, shown here, born in 1947, 75 in 2022, would be his younger brother (or sister ?).
"It all started with Natacha Rey who, as soon as she saw her appear, had the evidence that Brizitte was a transsexual and investigated for three years... Some only obsessed about her wig and blue-plastic contact lenses... already bizarre. To deny the wearing of a wig, the Élysée used a procedure that will go down in history. The palace had a job offer published looking for a hairdresser capable of applying extensions [article of January 11, 2018]. Unheard of! Never does the Presidency post a job for such a position. It's a bit technical, though, extensions [page Wikipedia] only lengthen a head of hair... and countless close-ups of Brizitte's head corroborate that she only wears wigs. Which are all the more noticeable because they are too large...unless she has a male-like cranial volume...". Article from January 18, 2022 also featuring short videos showing that in the way she moves and is, Brigitte is not very feminine... | ![]() |
![]() "Thanks to the wind! Here you can clearly see the little bit of hair attached to the front on the tiny shaved hair and another floor with the hairpiece, I used to be a hairdresser and I know how it's messed up !" [tweet] | ![]() "Hands say a lot about a person's age" [tweet] | ![]() The arms too... |
AV - Have you been a victim of social networking too? Recently, you were called a man on social media. First it hurt you, that?
BM - At first I looked at it from a little bit far, I heard about it and then well... And then at a certain point, I realized that they were upsetting my genealogy. AV - How's that? BM - That is, they had changed my family tree. That is to say, three quarters of the family was fine and then all of a sudden we get to my brother. I am my brother. And there, we touch the genealogy of my parents and there it is impossible. AV - When you say "they," who are these people? AV - Exactly. But you, you have, dare I say, the means to defend yourself. BM - Totally. AV - Finally, a 13-year-old or a 13-year-old who continues to suffer in silence.... I think it took you five-six days to get some information out... BM - I took five and a half days... AV - Five-six days, you?. BM - Yeah, five and a half days, I think, yeah. So you can imagine... With a lawyer who is experienced in the practice... |
January 23, 2022: while in the process of first finalizing this page, I learn of the discovery of a >>>INA video>>> of 1 min 47, dated September 27, 1977 (it has disappeared from the page INA around February 10, I replaced it with a saved version, 15 MB). It features an interview with "Véronique and Martine, transsexuals in the 70s", Martine with her face uncovered and Véronique with her contours in the dark. On the television channel "Antenne 2", they answer the journalist François Desplats with the comment (typing errors included) :"Veronique and Martine, who became women after an operation, bring a testimony on their transsexuality. With her face hidden, Veronique talks about her operation. For her, it is not a transformation because she has always felt like a woman. Martine evokes her difficulties in the working world. Since her operation, she had to change jobs because the environment in which she worked would not have accepted her gender change". This video is incomplete. The rest of the dialogue between Veronique and François Desplat is transcribed in Appendix A 19, but the essence is already here.
This comparison of voices allows us to affirm that Brigitte and the transsexual Veronique are the same person, therefore that Brigitte Macron was born male. Certainly the expert is self-proclaimed, but his statement appears accurate, no contradictory analysis was presented and especially everyone can see with the video above that the voices are the same... |
Mid-1980s. Jean-Michel Trogneux (40 years), although a family man, becomes aware of the "gender dysphoria" that he has buried for so long and is about to perform his "reassignment". It must be said that the times strongly encourage such steps. [...] The law is beginning to evolve. if it is still legally and medically forbidden to change one's sex by surgery in France, a public care pathway was defined in 1979 based on a two-year psychiatric follow-up before being able to access hormonal treatment and then surgeries (it takes three years) that are quite costly and generally performed abroad, mainly in the Netherlands and Great Britain.
Under the influence of Pastor Joseph Doucé's Center of Christ the Liberator, which welcomes, connects and files (on whose behalf ?) members of "sexual minorities" (homosexuals, lesbians, sadomasochists, transvestites, transsexuals, pedophiles, etc.), from Dr. Léon Pérel, who operates openly at the Saint François clinic in Paris, and from Henri Caillavet (Masonic dignitary of the Parliamentary Fraternity), the media are giving ever greater prominence to the subject. |
As an introduction to this chapter, after it was written and before it was finalized, I add, on January 22, 2022, a discovery of this day, from twitter : a new photo of Jean-Michel Trogneux ! The context in which it is taken, under a banner of the Groupe de Libération Homosexuelle, and the blatant resemblance with other photos (see below), even more than the one with Pastor Doucé, leaves little doubt.
Here is this photo present here on the website of the magazine "Têtu", in a slideshow of "12 archival photos of the first Parisian prides". It is dated June 25, 1977, Jean-Michel was 32 years old : (P.-S. of February 3: another photo with the banner and the two people on the right) Hypothesis rejected (the figure in the top hat not being Jean-Michel Trogneux after all) |
![]() ![]() In the center photos, you can see the same incisors spread out... |
He is in second grade. He starts a romance with his theater teacher, a married woman 24 years older than him. [...] Winter 1992-1993, the high school drama club had been in decline for several years. Brigitte Auzière did not hesitate to revive it. A dozen high school students are enrolled, including this boy she had seen at the ceremony of internship reports, Emmanuel Macron, who is in second grade like her daughter Laurence. |
![]() The private Jesuit high school La Providence in Amiens. In 1993, Emmanuel Macron played the scarecrow in the play "La comédie du langage" by Jean Tardieu (a premonitory title for a manipulator of lies and a premonitory role to which was added that of a puppet...). Brigitte Auzière, future Macron, French teacher, in class with another student and in front of her pupils. At this time in Amiens, there is no photo, nor video, where Emmanuel and Brigitte are on the same picture. ![]() There are quite a few photos on the Internet of Brigitte at the high school "La Providence", with other teachers or with students, often from the France 3 documentary "Brigitte Macron, un roman français". It is difficult to date them, as Brigitte practiced in this high school from 1991 to 2007. Xavier Poussard [F&D499p5] and Natacha Rey believe that during a certain period, Brigitte systematically wore a scarf around her neck, as if she were hiding the traces of an operation (Adam's apple...). See also this photo of tweet (or over-interpretation of restoration software ?). ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() On the left 1st L class in 2000/2001. The photo on the right is obtained from the previous one by clearing the hair around the ears. In the photos from that time, Brigitte had a much smaller chest than in her post-2015 photos. |
The journalist Gaël Tchakaloff, born Lucile Gaël Buffet (1971) is a close friend of Brigitte Macron (dixit: calls her when she is not well. "she is a regular at the Élysée, wanders through the corridors, the offices, enters the madame wing (the private part) like a mill." She also wrote a book about her "duality" "Vacarme" (duality man-woman ?) (links : 1 2). Gaël is her middle name at the civil status, a mixed name, which is never neutral, because her mother wanted her to have "the freedom to be a girl or a boy, like George Sand". Strange to find this reference as Brigitte / Véronique does when talking in 1977 about Sand and Chopin who would be transexual. |
"When I told Brigitte Macron, by phone, of my desire to tell the relationship that the first lady has with the head of state, she reacted very badly," the journalist confided. She then added: "It hurt me. To the point of crying, sobbing, hiccuping." [...]
In his book, Gaël Tchakaloff explains that the couple can not stand that we touch his intimacy and that this is the only subject that can truly upset Brigitte Macron. As recounted in the book, the latter had moreover indicated: "I do not want anyone to talk about us, I do not want our couple to be exposed". Writing this book was therefore no easy task. The author explained that she spent more time fighting for access to the presidential couple rather than writing. "As soon as it became known that I was writing a book, politics everywhere replaced friendship," she revealed before indicating "I was constantly in the conflict of loyalty between friendship and writing." |
At the Trogneux household, one is a thousand leagues away from imagining the vaudeville that was being played out in the family home where the couple met.
Emmanuel took advantage of Jean-Claude Trogneux's [his older brother] absences to sneak up on Brigitte, who was basking by the family pool. And would run off into the bushes with his towel, as soon as he reappeared.
[...] The confrontation will come, however, when the oldest sibling stumbles upon the couple in the garden. It is the starting point of many quarrels. [...] She will not manage to convince them of a necessity : the first lady can well ensure to have always perceived Emmanuel Macron as a contemporary, his relatives, them, measure at the time each of the twenty-four years that separate them |
![]() |
Brigitte is the woman of his life, the one Emmanuel Macron met on the benches of high school. He was a student, she was his drama teacher. A transgressive love that will lead many years later to a marriage. But before reaching that point, the lovers had to face the wrath of Emmanuel Macron's parents, who did not look kindly on his romance with an older woman. Worried about the future of their beloved son, Mr. and Mrs. Macron even decided to abruptly remove him from his school in Amiens to "exile" in Paris. If since then, water has flowed under the bridge, Françoise Noguès, the mother of the former Minister of the Economy, has not forgotten the wounds of the past. She even decided to tell them to the journalist Anne Fulda in the book Emmanuel Macron, "Un jeune homme si parfait". In it, the mother of the family talks about the one who overshadowed her in the heart of her own son: the omnipresent Brigitte. In its new issue, on newsstands Friday, April 6, Closer explains why the relationship between the two women has not always been in the pink, far from it! |
![]() |
![]() |
|
In the heart of Picardy, between Amiens and Vimeu, grow up two young boys that everything opposes. A few years apart, they do not attend the same schools, not the same streets, not the same parties. One has a neurologist father, and a wonderful French teacher, his grandmother known as "Manette". The other lives in a damaged house, far from everything, and dreams in words.
Both will flee to the capital to fulfill their personal destiny, and make a name for themselves. Eddy Bellegueule becomes Edouard Louis, a famous novelist, translated all over the world, gay, very committed to the left, close to the sociologist Didier Eribon. Emmanuel Macron, Manu for his friends in Amiens, will be President of the Republic.
"His French teacher Jeanne Verdier admitted to finding out that Emmanuel had exfiltrated to Paris in September and that his parents were close to filing a complaint." |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Brigitte refused to reveal when the unlikely couple first became intimate, saying it was "our secret." [...] But Macron's parents, both doctors, are not impressed. They decided, however, not to file a complaint for "corruption of a minor" with the police. His mother Françoise confronted Brigitte and begged her to leave her son alone, at least until he turned 18. Brigitte told her she couldn't promise him anything. [article from the Daily Mail on April 27, 2017] |
This is how Emmanuel Macron found himself in Paris at the age of 17 to complete his Terminale at the Lycée Henri-IV. In the evening, he returned alone to his maid's room, complaining about his parents' decision to keep him away from his girlfriend. Fortunately, during the weekend returns to Picardy, there are moments stolen from the world during which he clandestinely joins Brigitte Auzière in one of the properties of the Trogneux family in Amiens. So many moments when, despite the love of his parents, he breathes away from them, sometimes considering their decision to send him to Paris as a cruel injustice. A fact, added to the divorce of his parents, that one could suppose to be at the origin of the need for family blooming that Emmanuel Macron has since cultivated and that he has been able to set in motion with his bride. This is in short what Tiphaine Auzière, Brigitte Macron's youngest daughter, recalled to the microphone of Europe 1: "Even if we do not have many years apart, he has always made sure to pay attention to me, to the children.(...) He is my father-in-law, it is his place and as such is also a head of family. The family is something important to him, that's why he wanted to get married." |
Everything is strange in the images of the wedding broadcast in "La stratégie du météore" [France 3 documentary, November 21, 2016, five days after the declaration of candidacy for the presidential election], from this sleeveless and particularly short dress worn by "Brigitte", to Emmanuel Macron's pink tie, not to mention the wedding cake evoking the horns of a Baphomet. If Emmanuel Macron's witnesses are well known, his fellow student at Science-Po Paris Marc Ferracci and his patron Henry Hermand, the wedding witnesses of "Brigitte", presented simply as childhood friends, remain unknown. Strangely, this marriage does not appear in "Les Echos du Touquet" which only mention a baptism as an activity of the town hall this October 20, 2007... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Image excerpted from a >>>video>>> 2 min 13 min marriage broadcast on FR3 (the one just above is from that too). |
While investigating the "green years" of Emmanuel Macron, as part of his investigation "Two French youths", the journalist Hervé Algalarrondo came up empty at every step "That's when I think I have "the right idea, address Brigitte. [...] She is the one who manages relations with the Macron family. A Bigourdan elected official told me his surprise, during a visit of the president to Bagnères. Out of kindness, he had asked her about her sister, Estelle, who lives not far away. Emmanuel Macron turned to Brigitte to know what to answer." |
The "Manette" character has several uses. First, it essentially helps explain the absence of photos and memories of Emmanuel Macron "So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life" (Revolution). Although he never officially lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [...]. This account of a "grandmother whose background is like a perfect Epinal image in order to illustrate the republican rise of a daughter of the people" ("A young man so perfect", Anne Fulda, Plon 2017) served, at first, to reassure François Hollande and the Socialists that "Emmanuel is of the left". Did the "Maman Ninie" of the Mitterrandian gesture inspire communicators to the role assigned to "Manette" ?
[...]Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron "nearly got adopted by his grandmother," "goddess of his enchanted world," "Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life. |
![]() |
At first glance, the real mystery remains the near absence of shots of Emmanuel during his childhood. A childhood that takes place, however, in the 1980s and 1990s, a time of massive democratization of photography and family film, the golden age of the Polaroid, the camcorder, endless slide sessions and voluminous photo albums.
[...] Emmanuel Macron is said to have insisted on being baptized at the age of 12 in the chapel of La Providence High School [link]. [...] In any case, it is surprising, to say the least, that the first shots of Emmanuel Macron's "official legend" are these three photos taken in the school (and not family) setting, a series dated from his 5th grade year, that is, from the year 1989-1990, that is to say, twelve years after his birth. |
![]() If he exaggerates, in my opinion, to consider that Jean-Michel Macron, the father, is a ghost (even if he has opacities), Xavier Poussard puts his finger on a new character who could be fictional : Jean-Michel Noguès. However, he exists, above, on the genealogical file of Manette. He is the brother of Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel's mother, and married to "Lucette N". He is especially supposed to be very close to the twelve-year-old baptized, since he is his godfather (the godmother is Manette's grandmother). Before questioning his existence, Xavier Poussard found some other available information : "Born in 1940 and died in 2006, Jean-Michel Noguès would have become "only" a general practitioner "because of a troubled youth" (Deux jeunesses françaises). A little light for an uncle to whom Emmanuel would have given enough importance to make him his late godfather..." [F&D500p5]. Whether Emmanuel got his middle name from his father or his godfather is incidental, the question is about the existence of the godfather so presented. And this induces another question "Could this godfather Jean-Michel be Jean-Michel Trogneux ?". At this stage of our knowledge, nothing confirms it, nothing invalidates it. Doubts invalidated |
In fact, it is essentially from the receptions organized at Bercy by the Macron's that the Mathieu Gallet [CEO of Radio-France, with whom he is said to have a romantic relationship] rumor has been spread.
[...] This is probably the most blatant known example of the assumed perversity of this couple operating as a well-honed acting duo "Every dinner at Bercy is an opportunity for Emmanuel and Brigitte to address the issue in front of their guests. "You know, they say that Emmanuel is homosexual... but it's totally false!" says Brigitte Macron who seems particularly affected. [...] For his part, when he receives editorialists or press bosses in private to prepare for his flight, Macron never forgets to mention "the rumor" in these political conciliabula. It is stronger than he : he is obliged to talk about it.
[...] This obsession with denial, in a private setting, ends up being counterproductive, because it revives the rumor even more.
[...] A former member of the Macron campaign would later confide "we knowingly relayed the story about Mathieu Gallet" (quoted by Marc Endeweld in "Le grand manipulateur", Stock 2019). A counter-fire in short. |
[sequence 1, in a stationary car, early 2017, before the election]
The one we absolutely must not let pass is Emmanuel Macron. He's the candidate of finance, a former Rothschild banker so it still reeks of conflict of interest. Frankly, I wouldn't vote for a guy like that. Besides, people leave his meetings in the middle of them because it's really crap. On top of that, he puts black curtains to hide the empty seats. The guy, he's good at selling wind, and frankly... I knew him, it was in 2013, it was when I was in the porn industry and I was invited to private parties, private orgies, and I had the opportunity, so I know that this guy is bi... So I had the opportunity to sleep with him and, uh, it was a threesome, but that's not the point actually. The point is that when you see him in private, when you've talked to him, you realize that he's a real scumbag. You really realize how much contempt this guy has for people, it's really... but... phenomenal. Afterwards, I can tell you that I had the chance, I'm one... maybe not the only one, but one of the Frenchmen who had the privilege to put him in the ass, ah yes, and that is priceless. There are some things you can't buy. [sequence 2, in a garden, a half empty bottle in hand, just after the 2nd round of the election, May 7, 2017] Hello everyone, it's Alexis, well hey I drowned my sorrows in alcohol. That's it, today, I can say it I fucked the president. Yes, Macron... Well, no, joking aside, those of you who voted for Macron, you're really idiots, because now you're going to have him up your ass for five years. I, at least, have the merit of having fucked him in the swingers' parties. It doesn't matter, we're still going to get it in the ass... It's not for lack of warning, I can tell you that in the months and years to come... Don't come and complain, it's not worth it, frankly, I'm telling you this very sincerely, from the heart. If I voted Marine Le Pen, it was precisely to counter this guy. You will realize in the months to come that this guy is crazy. You're going to have a lot of demonstrations, that's it, too bad for you. It's too bad for you. And those who are going to lose their jobs and who voted for Macron, I won't come to pity you either. And there you will regret and say "Well shit, if we had known...". You followed the media propaganda, that's it.... But I think most people are sheep and apparently that's not going to change. That, you have to digest, I'm going to finish my bottle, bye... [sequence 3, earlier or later, in the same car, driving] I met an actress who frequented private libertine parties. They weren't parties where you pay, you go in, they were parties with rich people.... there are lawyers, businessmen, showbiz people, who come to these kinds of parties. There are some who pay for this kind of party, I was invited. It was this actress who let me in because she knew the owners. And so she introduced me to this kind of environment. You have to know that in this kind of place, I have seen some famous people, even ministers, people in the assembly, from the right and the left and I can tell you that politics is a joke because they make believe on TV that they are fighting, that they hate each other, that they don't agree and all that, but in reality you see them fucking together. So they're fucking together and they're talking business together, so it's a little bit contradictory. |
![]() | ||
Above, Alexis du Réau in each of the three sequences from 2017. Defense Council at the Elysee [drawing diverted from "The Duck Year 2021"]. |
![]() | He also directed a >>>video>> of 27 min 19 "Brigitte Macron live" with a yellow wig (opposite), where he states (at 21 min 55) : "Did you know that Brigitte is a trans?". |
![]() Under the copyright "Réau Alexis/SIPA", we find Alexis photographer in a report of "L'Obs" (link) on the party organized by Brigitte at La Rotonde, a famous Parisian brewery, on the evening of the 1st round, Sunday, April 23, 2017. He makes photos 3, 4, 5, 8 of a 14 photo slideshow. Here three extracts. ![]() ![]() ![]() After their wedding cake in the shape of a giant phallus with devil horns, the Elysian couple has repeatedly had amazing attitudes, including hosting DJ Kiddy Smile's tranny and trans group at the Elysée (link). Aunt Yvonne must have been turning in her grave... Less surprising is the long friendship between the Amiens-based Brigitte and Michou, born Michel Catty in 1931 in Amiens, openly homosexual, died in 2020, famous director of a theater in Paris (link). |
My analysis of Emmanuel Macron comes from both the images I have in my possession and the biography the candidate claims to have. The young Emmanuel Macron at the age of 15 suffered a serious sexual assault via his teacher who at the time was 39 years old.
Instead of the rosy vision of this union that could be defined as a repairing marriage (to repair the rape), I see in it rather the fact that Emmanuel Macron's development was prematurely blocked in the middle of his adolescence because of a seduction operation both psychic and physical. What happened was to go beyond a taboo and to go beyond a limit at the same time. The limit even that prescribes the taboo. So the first passage was the conviction that everything was allowed.
Naturally this feeling of omnipotence took place within the good bourgeois society of Amiens in the North of France. If this union had taken place in a proletarian social environment, this environment that Emmanuel Macron deeply despises, well Emmanuel Macron would have been destroyed and would be followed by the social services and Brigitte Macron would be in jail. This is the sad truth. We are facing a pedophile type problem. Once the limits of the taboo were exceeded, it happened that the idea of omnipotence proper to each child was subsequently encouraged. Until exceeding an own overlap of the reality that, reinforced by intellectual advantages, make him extrapolate his own personal limits. The paradox is that it seems pathologically normal, but we are in the middle of narcissism. Since his youth, Macron has nourished an extraordinary ambition. He needs the gaze and admiration of others to compensate for his inferiority complex. So we are faced with 3 paradigms that define a certain type of personality :
What do these 3 paradigms structure? It structures what we call a psychopathy because we are confronted with an individual, Emmanuel Macron, who as a psychic organization is perfectly definable as a psychopath. The word " psychopath " is not an insult. A great American analyst, Nancy Mac Williams, explains verbatim that a psychopath can reach the highest levels of the American administration. So the psychopath can of course be a deviant but if he is well organized from a cultural, social, etc. point of view, he can also reach the top of the elite in the fields of politics, finance, which is the case in the profile studied. ![]()
What we see well in Macron's fits of hysteria at the moment when admiration pales and highlights the weaknesses of his identity. This hysteria is characterized by his interest in theatrical stagings that do not fail to recall, disturbing coincidence, his personal history with his teacher who taught theater. The psychopath is not trustworthy but succeeds in convincing his interlocutor through the fascination he exerts. He has no remorse. When Macron talks about the poor or insults the proletarians of the North by reducing them to smokers and alcoholics, when Macron denigrates women by reducing them to the rank of ignoramuses we return to the discourse perfectly explained by Jacques Lacan. For he believes in what he says and cannot help but express it. So Macron defends himself by changing the meaning of his statements but without ever expressing remorse because he never feels guilt. So what is the problem from a psychiatric point of view? How dangerous is the character? I answer that there is no doubt about it: Emmanuel Macron, like all psychopaths is particularly dangerous. A specialized American intellectual, let's call it "well-integrated disturbances" among notables said verbatim : " serial killers destroy families while psychopaths in office at the top of politics and economy ruin societies. " Why is Macron dangerous? He is dangerous because :
The conflict with Marine Le Pen is not for him a conflict only of political level. He can not accept that a woman, the Marianne, the representative of France is his antagonism. He needs a nurturing mother. Any other relationship with a woman becomes difficult to assume. So this fragility is very dangerous because like all psychopaths who work only for themselves and who consider others for his own greatness underlines in this case to which point of danger is currently a country like France facing a candidate of this kind. |
![]() "Jupiter's" sense of omnipotence upon taking office, in front of the Louvre pyramid on May 7, 2017 (link). In hindsight, the slogan "Ensemble la France" is revealing of a character with an asserted psychopathological profile, who has not hesitated, in a crisis situation, to impose segregationist measures hitting millions of French people in their daily lives, even assuming that he wants to fuck them up to the end ! |
"The unvaccinated, I really want to fuck with them. And so we're going to keep doing it, all the way. That's the strategy". Signed Emmanuel Macron. The most fanatical Macronist defenders will cry that this is fake news. Well no, it comes from the Parisien dated January 4, 2022 taken up by the AFP, then in all newspapers and is running at full speed on social networks. The new year starts well.
Yes, by this statement Emmanuel Macron, has insulted millions of French people by annoying them. This has not failed to cause a general outcry, whether from political parties or well on the internet.
We have never seen a president of the Republic who has so divided, fractured the people, treating them with a rare contempt. We remember his invective about "those who are nothing", "the illiterate", "the lazy", and "the Gauls resistant to change". But even more seriously, we are concerned about the mental health of the President of the Republic. For to hurl such insults, especially when one is head of state and has responsibility for nearly 68 million French people, one must be totally politically suicidal, or suffering from a serious pathology. This is why many Internet users are seriously asking the question: is Emmanuel Macron suffering from psychosis? The hashtag #Macronisunpsychopathe has also appeared on Twitter after these statements. If he is not, he has many of the characteristics. Psychosis is defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry (DSM) 4 and 5 as an antisocial personality disorder that relies on antisocial behaviors resulting in "a pattern of disregard and transgression of the rights of others that occurs since the age of 15 years" that can be associated with at least 3 manifestations below :
Furthermore, the profile of the psychopath is presented as "an arrogant, manipulative, insensitive, seductive, dominant and fearless person". Our national pimple fits that definition well. What are the deputies and senators waiting for to start the impeachment procedure immediately? What are the police doing? He must leave as soon as possible, this man and his government are a danger, a disturbance of the public order that the French will not support 5 more years. It remains to be seen how Macron's supporters, the Marcheurs (hey guys Winter is coming!), as well as the staunch covidists, will come up with ideas to continue defending the indefensible. Good luck with that. Our solution is a psychiatric diagnosis and probably a straitjacket. |
| ![]() A France 3 news report picked up this sign with the word "degree" erased (photos, link). |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Photographs by Liewig Christian (Abaca), Christophe Archambault (AFP), Cyril Dodergny and Ludovic Marin (AFP). |
![]() |
The date of birth of "Brigitte"
Remember that before being given precisely in May 2016, the date of birth of "Brigitte", was commonly located at "the late 1950s". We reported the birth of a Brigitte Trogneux in the civil status of the "Courrier Picard" of April 14, 1953 (not April 13, 1953, the generally accepted date), a civil status published in the April 15, 1953 edition of this local daily newspaper in which there was also a birth announcement for Brigitte Trogneux (reproduced in F&D #500). It had escaped us that a first announcement had been published in the previous day's edition (April 14, 1953), but that this birth was not mentioned in the civil status of April 13, 1953. Strangely, this first announcement omits one of Brigitte's sisters, Monique Trogneux. If it is surprising to say the least that a birth can give rise to two different announcements, let us stress that these documents are subject to caution. Indeed, if on an extremely reduced set of documents (in this case the one attesting the existence of a Brigitte Trogneux born on April 13, 1953), we already find a significant number of forgeries (false testimonies, false wedding announcements, false pictures of "Brigitte" child, etc.. ), doubting the authenticity of the rest of the documents in the file becomes a methodological imperative, which is indeed the difficulty of this investigation where it is a matter of disentangling the true from the false and not of "believing" or "not believing". |
I have not enumerated the successive known lies of the two legends, that of Brigitte and that of Emmanuel. Two legends that are only one, that of the couple, so much there is concordance. Surprisingly, both of them become clearer around 1992 with what is presented to us as their first meeting. Xavier Poussard [F&D497p4] : |
|
![]() |
On the left, a case of the lie factory, and its denunciation. Macron has increased the pressure on the hospital and weakened it with the non-renewal of strategic stocks of masks, with budget cuts and bed cuts, even during the health crisis of 2020, with the exclusion of staff in July 2021 (vaccine obligation). He is therefore the first responsible for the hospital crisis of late 2021 and he blamed the non-vaccinated !
Right, a case of covering up the lie, and exposing it. The lies follow one another, but, discreetly, Macron tries to erase some of them to better persevere in his flight forward. |
![]() |
![]()
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Saturday afternoon demonstrations, here on 4 September and on the right on 31 July 2021 (in Rennes, photo Ouest-France). 1: Eyes in the eyes "The health pass will never be a right of access that differentiates the French. It cannot be mandatory to access everyday places, such as restaurants, theaters and cinemas, or to go to friends Emmanuel Macron, source Le Parisien of 29/04/2021. The word of this government is worth nothing !" 2: Billions for the hospital. Not for the multinationals. Let us eradicate the macronavirus. 3: I am a trader, not a health policeman |
Moreover, while I sometimes feel a lesser combativeness among the Resistants, I think that we have here more than a subject of indignation, we also have a subject of laughter, mockery, quips, sauciness and we would be wrong not to laugh on the back of those who oppress us. There is no transphobia in making fun of ultra-mentors. What would Pierre Dac have said on Radio London ? Let's not let this opportunity pass, it lifts our spirits and allows us to attack 2022 in good spirits with the will to turn the tables. |
![]() "When everyone lies to you all the time, the result is not that you believe those lies but that no one believes anything anymore. A people who can no longer believe anything cannot form an opinion. They are deprived not only of their capacity to act but also of their capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people, you can do whatever you want." Ariane Bilheran has studied the Covid crisis from this angle : pdf file of three articles "Psychopathology of Totalitarianism". Jean-Marc Sérékian, on a adjacent page, followed up with an article titled "Totalitarianism in the Digital Age." |
Next to novlanguage [reference to Orwell and his novel 1984], the accusatory inversion holds a place of choice in the propaganda tools of the oligarchy. Deciphering.
Accusatory inversion is a defense process well known in the courtroom that consists of imputing the final cause of a crime not to the guilty party but... to its victim. Thus, for example, if a tourist was the victim of a pickpocket, it is because he was careless in displaying his money: in a way he incited the thief to carry out the act. The accusatory inversion has become a weapon in the hands of the oligarchy, all the more formidable because it relies on media flabbergasting. The oligarchs never cease to accuse their opponents and the European peoples of their own vices. Example: conspiracy, which would be an extreme right-wing disease consisting in seeing conspiracies everywhere. But in reality it is the oligarchy that is permanently plotting against the European peoples: against their sovereignty and their identity. The oligarchy is not plotting, but it is negotiating the Transatlantic Treaty in the greatest secrecy. They are not plotting, but they are trying by all means to draw us into a growing hostility towards Russia. It does not plot but it imposes on the French people, with the Treaty of Lisbon, a European treaty that they had rejected by referendum. |
![]() (the existence and date of the Jean-Michel Trogneux - Véronique Dreux marriage is explained in the next chapter) Rejected Tree |
I can tell you, as a doctor with family members who are consulting physicians at the CPAM, that there is very little possibility that the person you are talking about, who was suffering from morphological sexual ambiguity, was referred to Dr. Françoise Noguès by the CPAM. It can only be the intervention of a specialized association and of colleagues also specialized in this field. This shows for sure that Dr Françoise Noguès was very sensitive to this type of situations and close to these associations. This is a point that caught my attention, it struck a chord, because this is really not the daily life of a cashier's doctor. Sensitized by what? This proximity, when compared to the cases of "her lifelong friend" [Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux], and her brother "with troubled youth" [Jean-Michel Noguès, there the relationship is less obvious, cf. Appendix A 13] strongly questions. There are very few medical consultants treating this type of problem, and as if by chance, the name of Françoise Noguès pops up. This leaves one wondering. |
April 2. A correspondent sends me the photo below, of a Première class in Algiers in 1960/1961 at the Collège-lycée Notre Dame d'Afrique, whose day school was located at 24 Boulevard Saint Saëns (extract from 1961 directory, photo), while Jean-Michel Trogneux lived in 1963 at No. 87 of this artery (Appendix A 22). He wonders about the unidentified student in the second position from the left of the top row.
![]() ![]() ![]() With a photo reworked to firm up the features, the comparison Betaface increases from 70% to 72%. The eyeball-to-eyeball and Betaface comparison is not very compelling (but not prohibitive). But with someone else from another class? It is possible that Jean-Michel spent several years in Algiers, including in a high school. Hypothesis rejected, having become chronologically unlikely, according to the Chapter 28. |
April 4. Here are new photos from the Saint Joseph El-Biar boarding school in Algiers in 1961, with a student who could be Jean-Michel Trogneux (links : 1 2). At this point, not much can be inferred...
![]() ![]() ![]() André Salette, the only one named in these two photos, was probably born in 1945 in Marseille, the son of an unknown father and an Algerian-born mother (link Geneanet). 1945 is also the year of birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux |
![]() |
![]() ![]() | ![]() Betaface comparison: 76%. |
![]() ![]() |
André [André-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's husband] is transferred to Alsace. [...]
In order to find a place for his little family to stay, André leaves first to take up his new position as deputy director of the regional delegation of the Banque de France du Commerce extérieur (which will later become Natixis). One of his professional relations, Jean-Marc, who works at the Autonomous Port of Strasbourg, praises the merits of his village of Truchtersheim, where his wife runs the nursery school. [...]
Truchtersheim (don't pronounce the second h, but you can save yourself the trouble and just say Truch as the locals do) is then a village of 2,000 souls that can be reached in half an hour from Strasbourg. [...] André and Brigitte rent from a farmer a yellow house leaning against the hill [violins, thanks Maxime Le Forestier. [...] At Truchtersheim, Brigitte uses the method of concentric circles to expand her network at record speed. Invited to dinner at the Uhrweiller home, the ones through whom they got to know Truchtersheim, the Auziéres meet other couples there. Whom they invite to dinner. Who then invite them back with new nipples. And so on. [...] In 1991, the Auziéres leave Alsace. With the exception of Mrs. Uhrweiller, the former school principal, none of her Alsatian friends will hear from her again, until the day in 2016, when, dumbfounded, they discover her on the cover of Paris Match on the arm of a very young man, a minister. |
![]() | Didn't the "And at the same time" policy, usually attributed to Emmanuel Macron, come from Brigitte Macron, who first applied it to her personal life ? She is at the same time Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux. She had two families, two children born a month apart, she was both father and mother, at the same time teacher in Strasbourg and administrator in Amiens... We will understand in this chapter and the next one that he knew how to make two Brigitte Auzière live, two André Auzière... Seen from afar, the illusion is convincing, except for a few surprises. Wanting to remove them leads to finding the mechanisms underlying a life that has long been fabricated and concealed. Now consolidated, however, our investigation has been laborious. |
![]() |
Jean-Louis is of the same generation as his brother Louis' children. His nephews and nieces are, for him, like brothers and sisters...
![]() (Sipa photo) |
![]() About her portraits of the Auzière grandchildren on her Facebook account, Catherine Audoy reportedly spoke the truth when she said they are family, but not on her side, implying : her husband's. They are the children of a niece of her husband and also the grandsons of his great friend. As for Jean-Jacques Trogneux, he is the son of the same boyfriend. It is understandable that she painted them, especially since she herself had no descendants. These paintings were the clue that stimulated the sagacity of Natacha Rey ... |
This Proba Auzière knows Jean-Michel-Trogneux very well, since they are the parents of the three Auzière children. We even saw that they reversed their roles, the mother Proba Auzière became the father (André-Louis Auzière) and the father became the mother Brigitte Auzière, later Brigitte Macron. Proba is a first name invented because we did not know what to call this niece of Jean-Louis Auzière. The presence of two Brigitte Auzière in Truch shows that her real name is Brigitte! And here is the sleight of hand, the magic illusion: Brigitte Auzière born Auzière is replaced by Brigitte Auzière born Jean-Michel Trogneux ! In addition one would have a photograph of this Brigitte born Auzière, it is on the tract of 1989 (to suppose that it was not doctored...): Hypothesis rejected (the photo on the flyer would be of Brigitte becoming Macron) |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Do you find it hard to believe such a statement? Brigitte Macron did say this to Sylvie Bommel for "Elle" magazine in 2017 (link). Here's the full quote: "My older sister was killed in a car accident, with her husband, and the child she was carrying. I was 8 years old. She is with me, every day of my life. A year later, one of my nieces of 6 years is gone." You understood that Jean-Michel speaks there of his big sister Maryvonne and not his little sister Brigitte, aka this niece who would have died a year after February 24, 1960, so at the beginning of the year 1961. However, this first-degree interpretation appears wrong. Two years later, in fact, in her book "He had just turned seventeen", Sylvie Bommel specifies that Brigitte Trogneux, the real one, was not 8 but 6 years old at the time of the car accident. If you look closely, it is exactly 6 years and 10 months. Above all, in this book, Sylvie Bommel, surprisingly, does not return to the death of the niece "one year later". And, on an entire page, she demonstrates, with the help of a pedopsychiatrist, that a child under the age of eight cannot be traumatized to that extent. However, in 1960/1961, Jean-Michel was 15/16 years old, an age when one is, on the other hand, very affected by the death of a close relative. Perhaps already to the point of wanting his younger sister to stay with him every day of his life. He will have succeeded, even physically, 24 years later ... |
In 2019, Senator Nathalie Goulet, as part of a fact-finding mission on social fraud and its impact on public finances, noted that the RNIPP file has many inconsistencies. For example, according to the senator, of the 110 million people registered, 84.2 million are "reputed to be alive," according to the INSEE formulation. 3.1 million people are also registered in the RNIPP as being over 100 years old and "reputed to be alive," half of whom were born abroad (for comparison, Insee estimated that there were 21,000 centenarians in France in 2016). Nathalie Goulet recommends that the file be urgently updated, as it conditions the payment of social benefits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Photo 2022 Stephane Lemouton - BestImage |
![]() Photo 2019 Dominique Jacovides - BestImage |
![]() ![]() Originals:document blue, document green, document yellow. The image on the left shows the two signatures of Brigitte born Auzière that appear on this page of the act. They are identical to that of the 1974 bride when she was a witness at Jean-Michel Trogneux's 1980 wedding, recalled in the green box (taken from Chapter 27). Blatantly (e.g., the shape of the p's), the handwriting of Brigitte born Auzière, who calls herself "nee Trogneux" here, is not the same handwriting as that of Brigitte Macron, reproduced on the right and analyzed in Appendix A 39. These are not the same people. So here we have evidence that : Brigitte Macron was not the bride of 1974! ![]() And here, above, is another, similar proof, with the writing of the word "Trogneux", twice in the blue document already seen, supposedly in Brigitte Macron's hand, and the same word written by Brigitte Macron, signing in 2007 a document orange, just before her marriage to Emmanuel Macron (Appendix A 39). Once again, these are not the same handwritings, Brigitte Macron is not the 1974 bride, who signed the blue document. Two different people claimed to be Brigitte born Trogneux. And neither of them was... Addition of 23/10/2023: it appears likely that the text in the yellow document is not in Brigitte Macron's hand. This one certainly is, and the conclusion is the same. + supplement in P.-S. of April 20, 2024. |
![]() |
![]() | For the one on the right in the middle, we thought, at first, to recognize the "paw" of André Louis Auzière, as shown by the comparisons, opposite on the right, with two other specimens from 1992 and 2001. But, on reflection, it could also be AM (Anne Marie) Annie (without the T of Trogneux), the sister of Jean-Michel. |
![]() |
![]() |
The few photos that came out of this " ceremony " are strange, if not disturbing.
Brigitte wears a very short and sleeveless dress, it is not a wedding dress.
Macron, on the other hand, wears a pink tie and a black suit [...] On the "most important day of his life", all the details count, so why break the codes? Especially with their cultural and financial level, there is no chance, but in a pinch.
The most... bizarre is their centerpiece. It clearly represents the horns of a Baphomet under flames. [...]
So how is it then that their wedding does not appear in the records of the city hall in which the ceremony took place?
There is too much occult symbolism, which does not bode well for anything holy.
[Franck Pengam, reprinting information from "Facts & Documents," "Les moutons enragés," November 14, 2021, link with illustration at right] |
![]() July 14, 2022, what fireworks... (link) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Brigitte Macron, speaks in 2017 about her change from father to mother of her children [end reminder of Chapter 10]: "I know I hurt my children, and that's the thing I blame myself for the most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was." |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The first three appearances of the new Ms. Brigitte Auzière in the "Lucie Berger" faculty photos. On the right, this same Brigitte with her daughter Tiphaine, aged about 7, around 1991. There is no photo of her with her first two children at the same age... |
![]() Photos Sipa, Vida Press, Abaca |
*** explanation about the falsely married and divorced. We had to admit that this 1974 marriage did take place, at the town hall, at the church, at the registry office, in the newspapers. It could not be more real. What is false in this marriage, it is only the make-up of the identity of the spouses. This make-up differs, moreover, for Mr. and for Mrs. For him, the present spouse is an extra, the administrative spouse being a fiction. For Mrs., the wife is real, but her identity is agglomerated with that of an undeclared deceased person. Moreover, after ten years, this real wife was changed; from 1974 to 1984, she was Brigitte born Auzière, mother of three children. From 1984 to the divorce of 2006, she became Jean-Michel Trogneux, father of the three children, feminized. From this 1984 change follows another continuity, which in our tree could have been translated by an arrow between "Brigitte Auzière" and the "Fake Brigitte Trogneux", but which is more simply signaled by this sentence: "1984, the father of the three children becomes their mother", to which we can add "while keeping the name Brigitte (married) Auzière".
Brigitte Macron is thus at once Jean-Michel Trogneux (the reality of his birth, youth, marriage and biological paternity of his five children), the reincarnation of his late sister Brigitte Trogneux (the unreality of his "legend") and the substitution of Brigitte born Auzière (the unreality of being the biological mother of his three Auzière children, also included in his "legend"). This is why he is also called Jean-Bri-Bri elsewhere in this file... |
Bold green, physical, flesh-and-blood actors; non-bold green when the role is held intermittently, mostly in writing ; in bold blue, fictional actors existing only from an administrative and legal point of view or through lies dispensed to the neighborhood ; in non-bold blue, when the role is held intermittently, mostly in writing. Continuities are marked by underlining. + The P.-S. 3 merges 1961-1974 and 1974-1984 into 1962-1984.
|
Date | Location | Event | See |
11/2/1945 | Amiens |
| |
1949-1961 | Amiens |
| |
1961*-1963* | Alger |
| |
1969 | United States |
| |
1972-1973 | Amiens |
|
|
1973-1979 | Blangy-Tronville |
| |
1980-1984 | Beauvais |
| |
1984-1991 | Truch tersheim |
| |
1991-2007 | Amiens |
| |
2007-2015 | Paris |
| |
2017-2022 | Paris |
| |
Notes :
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Date | |
1945 | February 11, birth of Jean-Michel Trogneux in Amiens, his parents, Jean Trogneux and Simone Pujol, are chocolate confectioners and are part of the Amiens bourgeoisie, having a villa in Le Touquet-Paris-Plage. He has an older brother and three older sisters. |
1953 | April 13, birth of Brigitte Trogneux, Jean-Michel's little sister. |
1954 | Fall or Christmas or January 1, 1955, family photo of the Trogneux parents and their six children. This is a rare photo, the only family photo showing Jean-Michel, the only one also showing Brigitte. |
1961 | Brigitte Trogneux dies, at the age of 7 years, in difficult conditions (accident ? painful disease ?...), so much so that this death is hidden by the family and is not declared to the registry office. Jean-Michel, about 14 years old, is very marked by this tragedy. The family makes believe that Brigitte is still alive. Perhaps to move him away from the place of this misfortune, the Trogneux parents send their son Jean-Michel to continue his studies in Algiers. He meets there two other students: Jean-Louis Auzière, is son and little brother of agents working for the French secret services, he will be later of a great help to Jean-Michel; Jean-Marc Uhrweiller is native of the commune of Truchtersheim in Alsace, that we will find below. |
1969 | At the time of the Apollo XI lunar mission, Jean-Michel Trogneux, 24 years old, would be in the United States. We know very little about his school and university career. The Trogneux parents continue to pretend that their daughter Brigitte is alive, studying abroad with her older brother Jean-Michel. |
1973 | Jean-Louis Auzière and Jean-Michel Trogneux stayed in touch. Jean-Michel met Brigitte Auzière, a niece of Jean-Louis. They became engaged. At the same time, Jean-Michel's parents had a piece of land with a house and a warehouse in the town of Blangy-Tronville, about ten kilometers from Amiens. They installed Jean-Michel there for a hardware store project, "Picardie Métal", with a representative. Jean-Michel is the manager. We do not know if he had other activities at the same time. |
1974 | The Trogneux parents want to show that their daughter Brigitte is still alive. The first name Brigitte of Jean-Michel's fiancée is a godsend allowing to consider a transfer of identity. Jean-Michel and his friend Jean-Louis set up an audacious stratagem in 1973 before the engagement. This scheme led, on June 22, 1974 in Le Touquet, to a half-fictitious, half-real marriage of the deceased Brigitte. The imagined husband is called André Louis Auzière. This fictitious identity is both a double of Jean-Louis (who likes to be called André, his middle name), and a double of Brigitte born Auzière, whose dates and places of birth she takes from Cameroon. The mayor of Le Touquet, a great friend of the Trogneux parents, brings his indispensable help so that the legality is apparently respected. An arranged photo of the wedding is published in the press. |
1975 | The first child of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Auzière was born in Amiens, while his mother lived in Issy-les-Moulineaux and his father in Blangy-Tronville. The child was named Sébastien Auzière, after his fictitious father, which was also his mother's maiden name. His mother left Issy-les-Moulineaux to settle in Croix, near Lille. Jean-Michel sometimes visits them. He is then supposed to be André Louis Auzière, as indicated on the doorbell, the mailbox and the telephone book (where the registration does not give rise to an identity check...). The Trogneux grandparents present the child as the son of their daughter Brigitte, who is supposedly still alive. Brigitte, born Auzière, plays the role of the deceased. Does she say she was born Trogneux? To what extent is the double identity of the parents used? To the point of having, for each of them, two identity cards? |
1977 | Jean-Michel Trogneux, and Brigitte Auzière have a second child, a daughter, Laurence. Like Sebastien, she was born in Amiens and has the surname Auzière. Jean-Michel began to have a double life, transforming himself into a woman, probably with the help in Paris of the group of help for transsexuals created by the Belgian pastor Joseph Doucé. On September 27, 1977, he is interviewed, in shaded mode, as being Véronique the transsexual. His voice, his tic of language "that is to say", his gestures are the same ones as those of Brigitte Macron in January 2022. |
1980 | Jean-Michel Trogneux, in addition to his double life man-woman, will lead a double family life. On November 24, 1980, he married in Blangy-Tronville with Véronique Dreux. Brigitte born Auzière, mother of his first two children, is witness. |
1982 | The married couple moved to Beauvais, where Véronique Dreux runs a confectionery and haberdashery store called "Tentations". In 1982, the couple has a child, Jean-Jacques Trogneux, born in Amiens. For Jean-Michel's parents, this does not pose a problem since they present Sebastien and Laurence as children of the deceased Brigitte and Jean-Jacques as the child of their son Jean-Michel, who is supposed to have only one home. We do not know the profession exercised by Jean-Michel Trogneux. He probably continues his double life as a man/woman and continues to see his Auzière family, as if he were the fictitious husband André Louis Auzière. |
1983 | Jean-Louis Auzière was appointed in 1983 as a French Foreign Trade Advisor, a role with unclear contours in the lineage of the jobs of his father Marius and his brother Louis, in the more or less secret service of France. He settled in Strasbourg. In the telephone directory, he is known as André (also in Croix, as the pseudo husband of his niece...). He joined an old friend from Algiers, Jean-Marc Uhrweiller, commercial director of the autonomous port of this city since 1972, who lived in Truchtersheim, near Strasbourg. |
1984 | Tiphaine Auzière, the third child of Brigitte Auzière and Jean-Michel, was born on January 30, in the same conditions as her brother Sébastien and sister Laurence, in Amiens. Three weeks later, on February 20, Jean-Michel had another child, Valérie Trogneux, daughter of his wife Véronique Dreux and sister of Jean-Jacques. It is at this time that Brigitte Auzière, the mother of Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, disappears. A new Brigitte Auzière settled in Alsace, in Truchtersheim ("Truch"). She is still Jean-Michel's resurrected little sister and she is still "married Auzière" and "born Trogneux", really even, or rather "born Trogneux". In fact, it is Jean-Michel Trogneux, who decided to abandon his complicated life of the last ten years. He chose his family: that of the three Auzière children, he left the other family of two children, starting with Véronique Dreux a divorce procedure, which will be signed in 1987. He definitively opts for the female sex, taking the identity of his sister to the undeclared death. He thus has his identity card, his social security number, everything appears statutory, including his marriage of 1974. The biological father of the three Auzière children is now pretending to be their mother. The fictitious father, André Louis Auzière, remains in place. Jean-Louis Auzière gives him more substance. He is supposed to work as a banker, deputy director of the Strasbourg branch of the Banque Française du Commerce Extérieur (BFCE). Jean-Louis sometimes takes on this professional role and occasionally passes through Truch where he plays the role of André Louis' husband for the neighborhood. |
1985 | Brigitte born Auzière, after holding her role one last time in February for a notary act alongside her pseudo-brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, fades away, probably living in Croix under another name. |
1986 | The new Brigitte married Auzière, born Trogneux, finds a job as a French teacher at the private high school "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg. |
1988 | During a notary transaction, Jean Trogneux accompanies his daughter Brigitte. The Trogneux parents continue to keep her alive, thirty years after her death. All the family accepted this reincarnation, brothers and sisters first, the last ones are lured. |
1989 | Brigitte Auzière, born Trogneux, is now well integrated socially in Truch and Strasbourg. Her three children are growing up, her husband André is often absent, absorbed by his professional activities, he is there from time to time. Brigitte participates in a municipal election. Her list was not elected. In 1990, at the "Lucie Berger" high school, she obtained a CAPES equivalent of a teacher of modern literature for private schools. |
1991 | Strengthened by these Alsatian successes, Brigitte returned to settle in Amiens, her hometown, with her three children. Her fictitious husband André Auzière, who now works in Lille, is still absent from Amiens. She got a job as a French teacher at the college "La Providence". At the beginning of the 1992 school year, she led a theater workshop and met a 14-year-old student, Emmanuel Macron, with whom she began a romantic relationship. The scandal breaks, Emmanuel must continue his studies in Paris. But they continue to see each other. |
2006 | André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux divorce under the benevolence of the same mayor of Le Touquet as in 1974. |
2007 | In Touquet, the same mayor married Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Trogneux, in fact Jean-Michel. The groom is a finance inspector, the bride is a teacher in a posh private high school in Paris. |
2017 | Emmanuel Macron becomes President of the French Republic and Brigitte Macron, born Jean-Michel Trogneux, becomes "first lady of France". |
|
Level | Hypothesis | Reference | |
6 - Certain | AA. Brigitte and Veronique the transsexual (operated or not) are the same person, so Brigitte was born and raised male. | red box
from Ch. 14 | BG. Brigitte Macron did not get married in Le Touquet on June 22, 1974. | red ink from Ch. 30 |
AB. The three alleged childhood photos of Brigitte Macron depict three different children. | Ch. 9 | ||
AC. The photo of the wedding of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux in 1974 is retouched. |
Ch. 7, App. A 18,
App. A 48 | ||
AS. Brigitte Macron, under the married name Brigitte Auzière, taught for several years in the high school "Lucie Berger" in Strasbourg. | App. A 36 | ||
5 - Almost sure
(intimate conviction) | AD. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux married Macron are the same person. Passes to "6 - Certain", February 2024 (P.-S. Feb. 26) | Ch. 8 | |
AE. The 1950s family photo is dated Christmas 1954, give or take a few weeks. |
End of Ch. 6 and
App. A 11 | ||
BC. Jean-Marc Uhrweiller and Jean-Michel Trogneux met in Algiers. | Ch. 26 | ||
COMIC. Brigitte Auzière, niece of Jean-Louis Auzière is the mother of the three Auzière children. | Ch. 30 + End of App. 44 | ||
AI. André-Louis Auzière is an invented character. | Ch. 9 and App. A 43 | ||
AK+AU. Jean-Michel Trogneux had a little sister Brigitte who died young, it is she who is in the family photo. | Ch. 28 | ||
BF. The 1974 marriage of André Louis Auzière and Brigitte Trogneux was registered, at the time, in the civil register. | App. A 43 | ||
4 - Likely | AG. The person coterminous with Pastor Doucé is Jean-Michel Trogneux, for both photos, the color one from "Faites entrer l'accusé" and the black and white one of unknown origin. |
Ch. 14 and
Ch. 24 | |
AH. Emmanuel Macron's biological father is not Jean-Michel Macron but a friend of his mother Françoise Noguès (Joseph Doucé or whatever). |
Ch. 23 and
App. A 21 | ||
BA. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Algiers around 1961 or in the US around 1969. | Ch. 25 | ||
| end of App. A 18 | ||
| App. A 48 | ||
3 - Fairly likely | AJ. Joseph Doucé is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron. | Ch. 24 | |
AL. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Macron is a transsexual (operated). | end of Ch. 22 | ||
AM. Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux is a transvestite (non-operated transsexual). | end of Ch. 22 + video of Ch. 13 (fly) | ||
AN. Jean-Michel Macron is the biological father of Emmanuel Macron | Ch. 23 | ||
2 - Maybe | BB. Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière met in Amiens around 1972. | Ch. 27 | |
1 - Unlikely
but plausible | QA. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same father Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux. | Ch. 23 | |
AR. Emmanuel Macron and Jean-Jacques Trogneux have the same grandfather Jean Trogneux. | App. A 24 | ||
BE. A woman, who is not a niece of Jean-Louis, who may be a close or distant relative or unrelated, is the mother of the three Auzière children. | End box of Schedule 44 | ||
0 - Rejected |
| Ch. 10 + Ch. 27 | |
| App. A 11 | ||
|
red frame
from Ch. 14 | ||
| Ch. 14 | ||
| Ch. 23 | ||
|
Ch. 6, App. A 11
App. A 48 |
Weddings. 22/6/1974 André Louis Auzière & Brigitte Trogneux at Le Touquet-Paris-Plage (Ch. 27, App. A 30). 24/11/1980 (+ 2) (variant: 1 2) Jean-Michel Trogneux & Véronique Dreux in Blangy-Tronville (Ch. 27). Death. 24/12/2019 André Louis Auzière in Paris (Appendix A 7). |
Pdf documents copied from other sites. The NBI file (App. 37). The December 2021 English file (App. A 22). Notarized documents (App. A 30). The articles by Ariane Bilheran ""Psychopatology of Totalitarianism". The book by Robert Kennedy Jr (App. C 14). The Covid report of July 2, 2022 (App. C 16). Excerpts from complaints against Natacha Rey (App. D 18). Pdf documents from a nearby page of this site pressibus.org. Covid Paranoia Journal from July 2021 to January 2022) Video footage made for this file. The voice comparison (Ch. 14). The Ode to Macron Mephisto (App. C 2). Video sequences from documentaries. Brigitte sits down (Ch. 13), Veronique the transsexual (Ch. 14), Brigitte Macron on RTL (Ch. 14), Alger 1963 (App. A 22), McKinsey in Parliament (App. D 19), Natacha Rey on September 10, 2022 (App. D 27). Songs (mp3). In App. D 11. Presence on phone books. André Auzière (App. A 30), Jean-Michel Trogneux (App. A 47). |
![]() |
Warning.
Chapters 1 through 22 were written in the original order of explanation of the subject matter. Some dated rearrangements have been added. Chapters 23 through 29 were added as research was done, presenting both an overall evolution and sidebars that did not all retain their original interest. Here too, dated reworking has allowed for adjustments. The concluding chapter 31 presents our understanding at the close of the file in terms of what we discovered or thought we discovered. Chapter 31 of the summary table of assumptions provides a nuance to the options outlined by degree of probability, which the reader can adjust according to his or her perception. Then come the appendices presented in four categories (the summary is at the beginning of the file). In each category, they are presented in chronological order of creation. Their sequential reading can therefore be disconcerting, especially for the Appendices A, with the impression of going from one cock to another. As written at the end of the introduction "This file is both a diary of the investigation and a status report on its progress." Lots of links connect roosters and donkeys. Web and pdf formats allow for searches within the text, better than indexes. Illustrations come from all over the place, often from tweets, photographic sources are too little indicated. Thanks to photographers or illustrators who would have liked to be cited, and to others, as iconography is an attraction of this file. Thanks to all those who helped me to elaborate this page, thanks to those who expressed themselves elsewhere, especially on Twitter, thanks to Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard. The media have disappointed us, ostracizing and ignoring us, with journalists who have forgotten what an investigation is and what information is independent of political pressures and money powers. This investigation, we did it without them and it will continue without them. Or, who knows, eventually, with them? I will close this file soon, I have made my contribution, I will move on. I will then content myself with the bare minimum, noting corrections, adding at the end of the page links to new sources of information, and even a few short remarks. This file is in copyleft (Creative Commons by-sa): it can be taken over, recomposed, completed... |
![]() ![]() ![]() Emmanuel Macron as a child. On the left photo of trombinoscope in 4th grade, 1990/1991 (coll. Gérard Banc). Then two images from the documentary "Macron, la stratégie du météore" (page "Macron president : 10 places in the Hauts-de-France that matter to him"). Apparently around age 12 (1990) and in a school setting, like the other three photos shown in chapter 17. ![]() September 1990, on a school field trip, photo of teacher Gerard Banc (link). Emmanuel then begins his fourth grade class, Brigitte's theater workshop will begin a year later. |
![]() This photo found on a tweet is from the German magazine Der Spiegel. It was taken on September 26, 1991 for the diamond wedding anniversary (60 years of marriage) of the couple Jean Trogneux - Simone Pujol. The added captions appear good. "Brigitte Trogneux" is present, but her husband "André-Louis Auzière" and her brother "Jean-Michel Trogneux" are missing. Why is the photo released not the one where everyone is facing the lens ? Perhaps to hide the presence of Veronique Dreux, the mother of Jean-Jacques and Valerie Trogneux ? |
![]() ![]() Mrs. Macron thought the tapestries smelled of tobacco, so the state spent a million euros to change them (article). Here are the new Pompadour (before, after, official photo, article) and Cleopatra (official photo) salons. Tastes and colors, we don't judge, but it's hard to resist a good word : "With such a taste of shit, no wonder he wants to fuck !" |
![]() The institutor of apartheid, the great separator, the one who trampled on freedom, equality, fraternity. Lies, always lies... (from the Elysée website ) |
Brigitte Macron lived for several years in Alsace, in Truchtersheim, with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children.
[...] Alsace holds a special place in the heart of the first lady, and for good reason. She lived for several years in the town of Truchtersheim with her first husband André-Louis Auzière and their three children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine, born respectively in 1975, 1977 and 1984. They rented a house in Truchtersheim from 1987 to 1991 and she was a literature teacher at the town's secondary school and then at the Lucie-Berger Protestant secondary school in Strasbourg, a past recounted in the documentary Brigitte Macron, un roman français broadcast on France 3 last June. It is thus with great nostalgia that she returned there in the afternoon of November 5, 2018. [...] Happy to return to Truchtersheim, Brigitte Macron asked to see a circle of close friends again , a request honored by Justin Vogel, the mayor of the town. If the interview took place away from the cameras, one of the people authorized to discuss with the first lady confided, and not just anyone, the former nanny of her daughters. "I am very, very moved to find her"... |
![]() [format initial] In other words, the brigittologist (or brigittologist) Fiko first noticed that this photo had been deposited there in 2017, the year of Macron's election, by someone named Sarah K, with a blurred face. This one had deposited on the site two photos in all, this one and one other with Brigitte). Among the students in the class, the identity of 13 of them was presented and listed in the database. Fiko had the idea to go and look for the information attached to them and discovered with surprise that these former students of the same class had very different ages today, between 33 and 67 years old... Sarah K. should have been in less of a hurry and more cleanly executed her trickery... |
[As noted in this chapter,] there are strong inconsistencies in the official Alsatian narrative. JMT/BM's presence in Truch is disputed on social networks. There is a cluster of elements that seem to say that it was not him who was there but an unidentified woman. In the TV movie "A French Novel", a lot of things seem fake: illustrative images, hesitant testimonies of Thiphaine and the mayor, there is also a visit of BM to Truch and there too the mayor says yes yes yes but doesn't seem to believe in what BM says (video). The meeting sounds artificial with the women they meet.
Uhrweiller met Auzière in Algiers and probably JMT, I'm not sure what his testimony is worth if out of friendship he covers for his former friends. However, it is his testimony that Bommel reports and which gives a little consistency to the Alsatian story and to the Auzière man who is perhaps non-existent. All the photos from the period are from the BestImage agency so possibly doctored. |
The "transparency charter on the status of the spouse of the head of state" is a little masterpiece of camouflage. The spouse is entitled to a director of cabinet, a chief of staff, police protection, operating costs... But, promise, swear, he or she receives no remuneration, he or she has no presentation expenses and he or she has no budget of his or her own ! In August 2018, on a page of his blog, Paul Cassiat had drawn up a one-year assessment of this "management of opacity" entering into an "Orwellian way of managing public affairs". By 2022, transparency, which was based on this agenda, has become very obscure... |
Regarding Jean-Michel Trogneux's address at 14- 16, rue des Vergeaux in Amiens (lot VC 26), we were able to establish that this address corresponds to an apartment located on the second floor of a three-story building. [...] Jean-Michel Trogneux bought this property on March 28, 1996. [...]
The research that we have carried out comes up against several anomalies. For example, the mention "nothing" is displayed in the Fichier informatisé des données juridiques immobilières (FIDJI) concerning Jean-Michel Trogneux for the urban property section VC plan number 26 (co-ownership rue des Vergeaux 14-16 and 9-11 rue des Lombards lots 2, 21 and 251) while his identity is taken into account by Télé@ctes. [...]
Our team in Amiens has interviewed shopkeepers and inhabitants of the area. All of them are categorical "never seen or heard of a Jean-Michel Trogneux". In the building of 14, rue des Vergeaux, the name J-Michel Trogneux, written by hand, is stuck "à l'arrache" on one of the mailboxes placed on two makeshift trestles. The building, its layout and maintenance do not seem to correspond at all to the economic and social level of the Trogneux described during our investigation. In the apartment (1st floor, left), inhabited, the television turns at full speed (one hears it since the street) but nobody answers, neither with the intercom, nor when one knocks at the door. The inhabitant seen through the window is an individual whose physical appearance is totally different from the "little fatty" presented earlier. We contacted one by one the inhabitants of 14, rue des Vergeaux. One person answered us, Mrs. Regond, who, surprised, specified us formally not to know Jean-Michel Trogneux. |
![]() This photo has two light sources. Orange colored arrows indicate where the light is coming from, blue ones show the presence of shadow. The characters on the left are lit from above but from the right, the characters on the right from above too but from the left. Now, the sun illuminates everyone in the same way, its light is diffused over the whole Earth and casts the same shadows, unlike a spotlight, which is omnidirectional. This would indicate that the characters on the left do not come from the same photo as the characters on the right. Another surprising fact is that they do not all look in the same direction. Or not at all. Normally, one stares at the photographer. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
After searching long and hard for a photo that would show Laurence Auzière and Emmanuel Macron, who according to the official version were together in class at the "lycee", that is to say from the second grade. I finally found it again, although it could not be found on Copains d'Avant or Trombi and the press curiously never revealed it to us. I now understand why!
In truth, they were college buddies and together only in 3rd grade. At the beginning of this school year, the year when his affair with his teacher Brigitte Trogneux known as "Auzière" began, the young Emmanuel born at the end of December was only... 13 years ! [...] Macron's parents themselves testified that they believed at the time that their son was dating Laurence, his young classmate, before discovering with horror, that he had in truth started an affair with her "mother" ! In public education, the latter would have been fired on the spot, prosecuted in Justice (prison sentence) and struck off the National Education. The press and the media have been lying to you since the beginning [...]. By reducing the age gap and making the "romance" start later, they were trying to make the general public accept the unacceptable. Mass manipulation and lying, as always ! Hypothesis rejected |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Nice carnival. A large head of Brigitte was burned in 2019, much to the chagrin of the mayor of Nice (articles: 1 2 3) |
At first, we thought that this little girl would be Christine Boulogne, the first grandchild, daughter of Anne-Marie and her husband Gerard Boulogne. Strangely enough her existence "has never been incorporated into an official caption", she would be born on March 26, 1957 [F&D501p2]. But then the photo would be dated 1958 or 1959 which would make Jean-Michel 13 or 14 years old, that's not possible. Unless she was born before or it was another niece...
This made me doubt Christine's birth date, is she sure ? I did a search on the web. I found a Christine Haquin (her husband's name, first name Benoît) born in 1951 living Brégy in Oise (link). This is indeed the one married to Benoît Haquin (link on dirigeant.societe.com), living in the same town of Brégy and this 1951 date, appearing on an official company declaration document, is more reliable than a date given by Généanet. Assuming that Christine is 2 years old, we are in 1953, or even 1954, and Jean-Michel, born on February 11, 1945, is 8 years old, which seems the most likely. Correction of January 30, 2022. As I indicated at the beginning of Chapter 23, the publication of this page provoked a citizen emulation, a small technical team was formed, gathering elements found on the Internet and analyzing them. First, yesterday, a message was received indicating, with supporting documents, that there were two sisters-in-law in Brégy named Christine and married Haquin, one born in 1951, the other in 1957. And the one whose maiden name is Boulogne was born in 1957, as Xavier Poussard thought! The above explanation did not hold anymore and the one of Xavier Poussard, dating the photo from 1959, or even 1958, still did not hold, as explained above. So we were in a dead end to date this photo. Happily, we had accumulated observations on this photo. First, very curiously, it also existed without the lampshade above Jean-Michel, as on this photo. This cleverly done retouching had whetted the curiosity of some Internet users who tried to solve "The mysteries of the lampshade". Thus the two tweets below were issued : ![]() ![]() The explanation for the first tweet does not appear to be conclusive, but the explanation for the second would be when you consider that the mother's right arm is facing backwards. The little girl would therefore have been added. ![]() So it seems likely that this photo is a careful photomontage between the group photo from 1953, or even 1954 (with Jean-Michel and Monique's ages indicated in the two unbarred parts above), and another photo from 1961, or even 1962 where Nathalie Farcy is 2 years old. Or also Christine Boulogne, the second photo dating from 1959, or even 1960. Or even a little girl unrelated to the Trogneux family... We can also add the hypothesis (expressed at the end of Chapter 8) of a Brigitte little sister of Jean-Michel who died very young, in which case there would be no photomontage, assuming that she was born around 1951 to justify the age gap with Jean-Michel. Or an older sister of Christine Boulogne who died young.
|
![]()
|
![]() ![]() ![]() | 1992/1993 ![]() In the trombinoscope |
Apparently, it was customary at La Providence to have a nature trip every year. So the bucolic photo is a school photo (like all the others of Macron). I have no objection to accepting the June 1993 date, even though I had originally dated it to the summer of 1992.
Apparently several classes were participating in the outing since Sebastian is present despite being 2 years older (if 1993, he is a senior). If several classes are participating, no oddity to see Laurence on the picture with Emmanuel. Prior to this outing, it is perfectly plausible that Brigitte would have requested and obtained that her youngest daughter participate in this field trip, especially if she was an accompanying teacher. |
The medical thesis by Jean-Michel Noguès shows no dedication, only the names of the thesis director (Pierre Galibert, neurosurgeon at the C.H.U. of Amiens) and the members of the jury. Its technical content seems clear, methodical, with balanced conclusions that are addressed to neurosurgeons.
In the Rosenwald Guide (directory of the French medical profession), for 1977-1978 and 1996 (last available at the BnF) : Noguès (Jean-Michel), general medicine, 27 rue Léo Lagrange, Amiens (today still a medical practice in a building). In 1977 as in 1996, Professor Pierre Galibert was the neurosurgeon of the Amiens Hospital. Jean Michel Macron, for his part, defended a scientific postgraduate thesis. In 1996 he was appointed professor of physiology (option "biological" and not "clinical") in the laboratory of functional explorations of the nervous system. So Françoise Noguès had a career as an office doctor, and her husband, Jean-Michel Macron, as a physiology laboratory doctor (link). So doctors who do not directly treat the sick. This may explain why Emmanuel Macron lacked confidence in the healthcare personnel during the Covid epidemic, preferring to defer to Big Pharma. |
There is a kind of generalist-specialist segregation, still tenacious today, because some consider that a doctor is only a generalist because he or she could not access a University Professor specialty. Manette would have liked her son Jean-Michel Noguès to have had such a university career. Her daughter Françoise started a specialty in pediatrics, but did not finish it. She compensated by marrying Jean-Michel Macron, a PU-PH (University Professor - hospital practitioner). Her other daughter Marie-Christine is an ophthalmologist (she is married Bové, apparently Philippe Bové veterinarian in Amiens).
Of the three children of Manette, it is indeed Jean-Michel "the least graded", at least in the eyes of an ambitious mother, for whom the eldest son necessarily carries all the family hopes, almost the family honor. Ten years apart from her sister, Manette has indeed had time to hope... Personally, I consider that the profession of generalist is the most beautiful, but prejudices are hard to overcome. |
Germaine Arribet, daughter of an illiterate valet, born in Tarbes in 1915 and became a schoolteacher [then a geography teacher] then a college principal. Before the Second World War, she married Jean Noguès, whose parents were merchants in Bagnères-de-Bigorre. The couple moved to the Nièvre region and then to Amiens. [...] Every school vacation, Manette and Jean Noguès, whom the future president affectionately nicknamed Coulou, returned to Bagnères-de-Bigorre, to the family home, with little "Manu" in their luggage. [...]
Also his grandmother as well as his great-aunt Nicole are thus hardly surprised when one summer, barely of age, Manu comes to Bagnères to introduce them to Brigitte, his companion, 24 years his senior. "We took her kayaking, hiking," recalls Nicole. She immediately loved Bagnères and the Pyrenees. Brigitte adopted Bigorre and the whole family at the same time. Besides they also came back every winter to ski in La Mongie." |
In his book Revolution, Emmanuel Macron recalls his sweet childhood memories. "My grandmother taught me to work. From the age of 5, once school was over, it was with her that I spent long hours learning grammar, history, geography. And to read." More generally, she raises him at the expense of parents overwhelmed by their professional activities. So much so that at the age of 5, the boy asks his parents if he can go and live with her.
"As he spends most of his time in the house of his beloved grandmother, why not settle there permanently ?", write journalists Bernard Pascuito and Olivier Biscaye, authors of the book Politicians also have a mother. The parents refuse. "He was built a childhood with Epinal images that sell well. With his grandmother a teacher and his great-grandmother illiterate," said Jean-Michel, Emmanuel Macron's father, in the book by journalist Anne Fulda, "A young man so perfect." To the great despair of his parents, "Manette" considers Emmanuel his "son." And he returns the favor. He literally has an unwavering admiration and love for the one who is his preceptress, his compass, in short, his emotional pillar. And for good reason, when Emmanuel Macron, then a teenager, struck up a romance with his teacher Brigitte, a married woman 24 years his senior, his grandmother was the only one to support him. |
Although he never lived in her house, Emmanuel Macron sows doubt [in his book "Revolution"] : "So I spent my childhood in books, a little out of the world. It was a still life". "I remember those early mornings when I would go to join her in her room where she would tell her war anecdotes, her friendships. As a child, I would pick up the thread of the interrupted discussion each day and travel through her life like picking up a novel. And the smell of the café au lait that she would sometimes prepare in the middle of the night. And the door of her room open as early as seven in the morning when I had not yet come to join her, exclaiming with feigned concern "Are you still sleeping ?""
"According to several witnesses, Manette lived her retirement cloistered at home, among books. She almost never went out, the rooms were plunged into darkness. [...]At Bagnères de Bigorre too, the shutters often remained closed, she was never seen outside" [Deux jeunesses françaises]. Anne Fulda briefly touched on the possibility that Emmanuel Macron had "nearly been adopted by his grandmother", "goddess of his enchanted world", "Queen of his childhood and even of his adult life" [Such a perfect young man] [...] In a relationship that resembles family instruction (now violently opposed by the government), one may be surprised at the literature that Manette would have recommended to his grandson. According to Candice Nedelec and Caroline Derrien, "as a teenager, the young Macron escaped by reading. [...] André Gide or even "Le roi des aulnes" by Michel Tournier are on his bedside table. Authors that his beloved paternal grandmother [...] gave him in sharing". [...] Let's skip André Gide ["The concerns of a private life marked by assumed homosexuality and the desire to shake up taboos are at the origin of" some of his texts, according to the introduction to his page Wikipedia] to focus on Le roi des Aulnes, Prix Goncourt 1970, a chemically pure synthesis of the obsessions of the intelligentsia at the time of its publication, in which Michel Tournier pompously manipulates signs and symbols (the concept of "phoria"...), plays on the ambiguity between Hitler Youth and death camps ("malignant inversion") to rewrite the myth of the ogre and, ultimately, deliver a radically pedophilic work. [...] Could the strange mention of this work in Emmanuel Macron's official biography be one of those signs he is so fond of? A key to reading ? Would his official legend be made up of "malignant invertions" ? |
![]() [excerpt from a article in Paris Match on January 5, 2018] [Reuters photo / Philippe Wojazer : Paris Book Fair, March 2017, in the middle of the presidential campaign] |
Emmanuel Macron's book, "Revolution," will be released on Monday in China on the first day of the state visit of the French president and his wife. [...]
Emmanuel Macron will be in China starting January 8, 2018. His book too. "Revolution", his book , in which he tells his personal story , his inspirations, his vision of France and its future [...] The French edition, released in November 2016 at the time of his presidential candidacy announcement, has sold more than 200,000 copies. The book is also already available in about 20 countries and translated into a dozen languages. [...] The French president is well known to the Chinese... for his love affair and marriage to his wife Brigitte. The age difference between the couple has caused a sensation in a country where men tend to marry women who are much younger than them. |
It was in the 1960s, Marie-Claire Stubbe had then been received by Germaine Noguès who occupied the position of principal of the elementary school [in Poix-de-Picardie]. At the origin of this interview, a terrible fact that Marie-Claire Stubbe would have done well without. "Until she was 6 years old, one of her four children attended school near Poix-de-Picardie. But her teacher was violent towards her. He beat her because she had visible marks on her face. And even, we could see bloodstains in a book."
So this unbearable and unbearable situation pushed him to find a new school for his daughter. That's when Germaine Noguès stepped in. "I will always remember that meeting. As soon as we told her about the problem, she didn't hesitate to welcome my daughter into the facility. She was very warm. It warmed my heart. I will always be grateful for what she did." |
At first glance, the story could only further enhance the luster of the saintly laywoman and "avant-gardiste" halo. On closer inspection, this one may well be tarnished by some awkward shadows. The journalistic narrative is designed to exalt the pious grandson through the uplifting life of his grandmother, and so it focuses on what Manette did...but not on what she didn't do. Faced with the drama of the little martyr, the caring and warm principal took her in without hesitation or delay. And that was it.
A teacher unabashedly indulges in unspeakable violence against one of his young students. She may not be the only victim, nor the first or the last. And the beating she received could also be a cover for something even worse. Taking in the child in this way can also be interpreted as the easiest way to discreetly cover up the tragedy... and ensure impunity for the perpetrator, allowing him to continue. Nothing in the story indicates that Manette did anything else. Like advising the mother to file a complaint, urgently alerting the school management about the teacher's behavior, reporting it to the rectorate, the prosecutor... In short, what one would expect from such an open, attentive and forward-thinking teacher in the face of "a terrible fact", "an unbearable and unbearable situation". |
![]() Official portrait of Brigitte Macron, by Soazig de la Moissonnière (Elysée website, link) |
Looking hard, we found three other photographs of Emmanuel Macron in the 1980s (still in his family). Diffused only once in the n°3547 of Paris Match, these photos were not diffused on Internet as it is now the custom. Inexplicably they were not incorporated into the authorized biographies produced later. |
![]() Brigitte has known Manu since at least the beginning of the 1991 school year (her daughter Laurence is in the same class as him) [and she may have known his mother earlier, Chapter 24]. Let's even admit that, suffering from visual disorders and a failing memory, Brigitte only became aware of the existence of the child, er... of the man of her life in the late spring of 1993. Manu was then 15 and a half, Laurence no more, Sébastien two years older, and Tiphaine at 9 years old was still in elementary school... Let's always admit that Sébastien, a 17-year-old teenager, finds it perfectly normal that a 15-year-old boy sleeps with his mother that Laurence, out of generational solidarity, finds it very "cool" that Mom's lover is a classmate; and that Tiphaine finds it convenient that between two cuddling sessions with Brigitte on the living room couch Manu kindly helps her with her homework... ![]()
![]() Let's summarize. The being apart and dignified banker forty years old regularly finds his wife in bed with a teenager, spends his weekends alone with his youngest daughter while his wife cheats on him... takes the first train to Lille and disappears until his death on December 24, 2019, abandoning wife, children, relations, reputation and money... Once again we are confronted with the absurdity of the official story that tries - very clumsily - to hide a frightening reality. As it has already been demonstrated before that the marriage Brigitte Trogneux - André-Louis Auzière is fictitious for lack of the existence of the husband, it is necessarily the same for the Auzière family ! But if there is no tangible trace of the real existence of the Phantom of the Bank, it is not the same for the "Auzière" children. They are real and were at once witnesses, accomplices and victims of the actions of their "mother". Before asking the question of their true identity, we must already question what they have suffered. Despite the lack of formal evidence, everything points to Brigitte/Jean-Michel Trogneux as the real father of Emmanuel Macron. But also as the author of a sexual attack on a minor of 13 years doubling as an incest according to the unambiguous statements - for once! - of the father/wife and the son/husband. If "Brigitte" was capable of such a crime on her son how could she imagine that she could not also have committed it on her other children, the Auzière children? Tiphaine admits it moreover : the three "Auzière" children were witnesses to the sexual assault on Manu, found it perfectly normal... and probably participated in it if we judge with what amoral candor a lawyer and politician tells about the sexual life of her "mother" and her very young lover ! |
Gabrielle Russier, born April 29, 1937 in Paris and died September 1, 1969 in Marseille, was a professor agrégée of literature. Following a love affair with one of her sixteen-year-old students, she was sentenced to a one-year suspended prison term for kidnapping and abduction of a minor. She committed suicide in her apartment in Marseille.
Her story has inspired many artistic works such as André Cayatte's film, Mourir d'aimer (1971), Serge Reggiani's Gabrielle (1970) [paroles], Anne Sylvestre's Des fleurs pour Gabrielle [1971] [paroles] and Mourir d'aimer by Charles Aznavour (1971) [paroles), or Josée Dayan's TV movie, Mourir d'aimer (2009), which will be criticized by the protagonists of the case. |
![]() |
![]() | [article from AmoMama of November 6, 2018] "During an interview, Frédéric Mitterrand made a rather unwelcome comparison between the Macron couple and another infamous couple." The former Minister of Culture, said "His marriage to a woman who is not of the same generation. It is a bit of revenge for the Russier affair". |
![]() Gabrielle Russier had been expelled from the National Education. Brigitte Macron is presented as a teacher by Minister Blanquer, November 18, 2021. In the background, students and teachers are muzzled, victims of government harassment. | ![]() Already in September 2020, the pedocriminal dared to pose on the cover of a magazine against child abuse. |
Another extraordinary character is her husband ALA [André-Louis Auzière].
[...]
JLA has always been called by his middle name André. It is him who under the identity ALA married Baphomet [Jean-Michel / Brigitte] in 1974. ALA, born abroad, never asked for a SS [Social Security] number, contrary to JLA who obtained it automatically, being born in France. It is thus under JLA's SS number that ALA's career was made at the BFCE and Natexis. However, he signed AA [André Auzière] as many documents attest. The JLA identity was used to take shares in companies. These company documents show that the AA signature is assured and consistent over several years, whereas JLA's signature over the same period is very inconsistent and therefore changing. Indeed JLA has always called himself André.
It is possible that JLA served as a cover for Baphomet during his stay in Alsace. On the other hand, ALA inherited from his parents at their death and therefore had a tax number. In 2003, ALA sold a property in joint ownership on rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré in Paris. JLA certainly transferred funds from ALA's bank account to access the proceeds of the sale. JMT [Jean-Michel Trogneux] also inherited from his parents and owns a property in joint ownership with Baphomet in Le Touquet. [...] The statute of limitations has expired and most of the accomplices are dead. The crime was almost perfect. |
![]() ![]() |
François Desplats (FD) - I can just assure you of the authenticity of Veronique's testimony. Veronique, I would like to know if, at the time you had this operation, which is the one you had, it was a difficult moment for you or it was just a culmination of something that had happened before ?
Veronique (V) - I believe that in fact there is not transformation because the psyche is already feminine and the individual, in this case me, is already prepared for this kind of mutation by necessity in the sense that one feels woman and one regularizes a situation without more. There is no mutation, there is regularization FD - You are completely female so you were operated on how long ago ? V - I don't really like the word become completely female. That is, we become a kind of woman who can copulate but cannot procreate. Hence the legal problems that we will talk about later. That is to say that the integration is done without problem on the individual level. They only exist on a social level; |
FD - You have a profession that we're not going to reveal here, let's just say it's a public facing profession
V - That's right, I'm a craftsman. I have regular contact with the public. I'm around customers. I don't have any problems. I used to have some, because I had a phenotypic gender, meaning an ambiguous appearance. I was taken for what I was not, that is to say for a homosexual, which was not the case, neither in my behavior, nor in my way of thinking. But unfortunately, this image resulted in a non-integration. And I regularized a situation for my integration. And I live very legally and very honorably. For the civil status, it is possible to change your first name for an ambiguous one. This is very important because it allows insertion, or pseudo social insertion. In the sense that there are always problems but that the problems are soluble at the administrative level, that is to say, by mutual agreement. But legally, there is no solution unlike all foreign legislation except for Belgian legislation which is modelled on ours. FD - Do you feel that you are now completely yourself? Do you no longer have any problem identifying yourself since you were operated on? of yourself since you had the operation? V - To tell the truth I only had identification problems with third parties, I didn't have any with myself. I considered myself as what I was as what I was, that is to say as a woman having a body which did not belong to her. It is very difficult to conceive for someone who is well in her skin. I use the term "comfortable in her skin" because it's the typical image because I didn't have any problems but people created them for me. Now I don't have a problem. To tell you the truth, this surgery, that is, this removal of an organ that is useless in our case because it is both unusable and unused... FD - Do you live alone? V - I am not with someone but I lived with a woman. And conceived this union in the style of George Sand and Chopin. Chopin was most likely a transsexual [Note by Xavier Poussard: we had not heard of this transphobic conspiracy theory...]. His melody, his way of playing, indicates it quite clearly. [...] I think the image that has been given of the Rimbaud/Verlaine union is a distorted, caricatured image that does not correspond in any way...[FD stops the conversation] |
![]() 2016, 2017 and 2018, when Brigitte Macron tells what she thinks of the Yellow Vests, though not very mean to her: "I know this violence and vulgarity" (link). She ignored the police violence... |
Let's go back to a question that has just been asked: what craft may have been practiced by Jean-Michel Trogneux, aka Véronique, in 1977 and in the 1980s ? Chocolatier ? Perhaps, but rather jeweler, since it is established that he held a jewelry store in Toulon. Here is what Xavier Poussard says [F&D501p3] :
|
Even though Xavier Poussard was specifically stating his source of information, we wanted to verify it. Here is that source :
![]() ![]() Document A So, through books.google, one had to query the "bulletin des annonces civiles et commerciales" from 1973. But this search engine no longer worked the same way. Depending on whether one queried by "Gallice" (link) or "Trogneux" (link), one got, each time on the same page 13.133, the following excerpts : ![]() Document B ![]() Document C
Do these two ad fragments, automatically assembled a few months ago, manually assembled with the new version of Google Books, reconstruct the ad ? Or do they belong to different ads? The wider knowledge of the ads and a careful reading of the "extended document A" gave the answer. Is Jean-Michel Trogneux the buyer or the manager? Can a jewelry store transform "materials, including iron" ? Is it not rather the neighboring company, Picardie-Métal, which processes iron ? And it is based in Blangy-Tronville, where Jean-Michel Trogneux was married in 1980 to Véronique Dreux...
|
It so happens that, by chance of common relations, we were able to get in touch with a friend of Jean-Jacques Trogneux [son of Jean-Michel, see three chapters before]. A relatively close friend since he was even his roommate for several years, in the early 2000s. By contacting this individual, we thought we could finally validate or invalidate our working hypothesis as simply as definitively. However, during the first telephone exchange (December 13 at 11 am), our correspondent certified to us that he had never physically seen Jean-Jacques Trogneux's father, had never seen photographs of him, and that Jean-Jacques Trogneux had never spoken to him about his father.
When we submitted our working hypothesis to him, the individual remained pensive before remembering that at the time, Jean-Jacques Trogneux often spoke of a young politician who was going to break the mold and that it was probably Emmanuel Macron. Three hours later, we were contacted again by the same individual who, in a completely different tone, affirmed that the current existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux was proven, that he had been a jeweler in Toulon, that he lived at 14, rue des Vergeaux, that Jean-Jacques Trogneux organized parties at the home of this father who simply did not wish to appear because of a failed curriculum and an unattractive physique ("a little fatty"). Furthermore, we needed to contact a third person who would tell us more. This third party did not respond to our solicitations. |
We are faced with three levels of disinformation :
Alongside disinformation (including "trolling" on the Internet), there is, symmetrically, censorship. It can be useful to the researcher in pointing out the right leads... However, none of this is as effective as the very upstream and sophisticated editing done by Jean-Louis Auzière. I believe that he is really strong. |
![]() Photos Abaca, Starface, Sipa, Starface (link) |
Emmanuel Macron: The drama that haunted his childhood!
The energetic and charismatic presidential candidate, Emmanuel Macron, hides deep inside a family tragedy that occurred shortly before his birth. [...] When you read the biography of the Picard, you discover that he is the eldest of a sibling group of three children. This is not entirely accurate. Indeed, ten months before bringing Emmanuel into the world, Jean-Michel and Françoise experienced the cruelest of trials: losing their baby. A stillborn baby girl. Could the couple have avoided this terrible accident? It is possible that being both doctors, he at the city hospital and she at the Social Security, this question haunted them. Even though just two months after the tragedy, Françoise was pregnant again. Is it to implore divine protection on their unborn boy that they named him Emmanuel, which means "God is with us" ? In any case, it was a gift from heaven that fell to them on December 21, 1977, four days before Christmas. But if life takes over, death is still lurking. As Claude Askolovitch writes in Vanity Fair: "Françoise carries the wound. Every February, the pain is throbbing. Retired today, she exhales a suspended suffering that I feel the day I meet her because she wants to talk to me about her son." How does a child who succeeds a dead baby build himself? [...] |
In 2017, in his book "Revolution, he devoted five pages to his grandmother Manette. Against barely one to his parents. And two lines to his brother Laurent, and his sister, Estelle, just enough time to mention that they are radiologist and nephrologist and that he was therefore the only one in the family not to participate in medical discussions that lasted hours. No mention either of his half-brother Gabriel, born in 2005 from his father's second marriage, and even less of his father's partner, Hélène, a psychiatrist in a hospital in Amiens (and one more doctor!). On the other hand, he takes care to mention the first names of Brigitte's three children and their spouses and those of her grandchildren [...]. |
![]() |
Brigitte, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, will visit the Central Faculty of Algiers (Benyoucef Benkhedda University), where she would have memories. Indeed, Emmanuel Macron will make an official visit to Algeria on December 6 as part of his tour in Africa. According to our information, the Algerian authorities have been informed of the desire of the first lady of France to visit the Fac Centrale d'Alger, where she would have studied. At present, we have noticed that the university is being embellished. According to our information, the work targets more particularly a room that Brigitte Macron would like to visit. |
![]() A preview of the debate. On the left Mickael Robinson, with his friend Barack Obama (disputed photo, comparison with more feminine variant that would be the original, the retoucher is good...). On the right Michelle Obama, née Robinson, with her husband, President of the United States from 2009 to 2017. Is this the same person ? Yes for this article, no for this one. |
I was looking, in this scenario, who might have prepared this before. I thought, this can't be right, there's an American in the loop. But I found a trace in an article in the newspaper Le Monde from 2019 of a man named Joel Benenson. He comes to Bercy [Paris, Ministry of the Economy] in 2015 when Macron is a minister to advise the Macron's on their communication. So who is Joel Benenson? He is the one who handled the construction of the Obama couple. |
Reputed member of the Grand Orient de France [Challenges, February 23, 2019], it is with a fairly extensive address book that Ismaël Emelien joined Emmanuel Macron at Bercy in 2014. The one for whom he has been working behind the scenes for at least two years will even introduce him as his "closest collaborator" to the influential "spin doctor" Joel Benenson during his visit to Bercy, in November 2015. Introduced by the Sarkozist Julien Vaulpré via the networks of the French American Foundation, Joel Benenson arrives haloed by his success in the 2008 and 2012 American presidential elections, having developed the strategy of selling the Obama couple rather than a program.
Let us note here that the more than substantiated suspicions about a transsexuality of Michelle Obama (cf. F&D 487] are today worth to Barack Obama's wife to be listed in the register of "famous transgenders and transvestites" established by the very informed website on the issue doublegenre.wordpress.com [site in French]. |
![]() ![]() On the left, in February 2014, Emmanuel Macron, accompanying François Hollande to Washington, had dinner with Joel Benenson [article with guest list, photo Mark Wilson, Getty Images]. At right, Joel Benenson, referred to as "Obama's Guru" in a article in Challenge, was in Paris in July 2019 [photo by AFP]. |
Manette [Germaine Arribet, married Noguès, Emmanuel's grandmother] was able to have a relationship with Jean Trogneux [Jean-Michel/Brigitte's father], and thus give birth to Françoise [Noguès, Emmanuel's mother]. She could be certain of this because of the absence of relations with her husband during this period. Françoise would then have had a special place. Through their biological father Jean Trogneux, with whom her mother Manette would have kept some links, Françoise Noguès and Jean-Michel Trogneux would have met very young. This explains both their long friendship [Chapter 24], the resemblance between Manu and Jean-Jacques and the attitude of Manette during the liaison Brigitte-Manu. Somewhere, the fruits of his great passing love... |
![]() ![]() [Right photo: Abaca] |
I think we need to dig into the Stonewall Inn in 1969 and also the first gay pride in 70. Brigitte Macron said she was in the US when Armstrong walked on the moon.... And only one month later.... Anyway here are some pictures of the event in Greenwich village at the Stonewall Inn. It deserves in my opinion further research... |
![]() ![]() AFP photo by Ludovic Marin and drawing by Ignace |
In 1980, Pierre Meyer decided to create a small performance stage in the room of the family restaurant he had just taken over with his wife Cathy. At first, he presented shows by seven artists, recruited in Paris, once a month, then very quickly every weekend. In 1989, he invested the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in the construction of a 200 m2 stage [...] In 1996, the establishment was renovated. A new complex of 800 m2, renamed the Royal Palace comes out [...] |
![]() ![]() This postcard shows us the "seven artists, recruited in Paris". None of them bear a resemblance marked with Jean-Michel / Brigitte Trogneux (Betaface comparisons: 1 2 3 4). |
![]() ![]() Photos Jean-Marc Haedrich / Sipa and EPA (link). 77 and 45 in 2022. |
![]() Jean Trogneux was not a man of ground. Rather a person made to evolve at a higher level in rather political spheres [he was notably close to Gilles de Robien, mayor of Amiens, MP, minister]. Jean Trogneux remained in office until December 1978. He had decided to resign two years before his mandate expired, before the Moscow Games. Games that were marked by the forfeiture of some nations like the United States. |
Was Jean-Michel Trogneux conceived under the American bombing ? If we go back 9 months before his birth, we get May 1944. And it is precisely at this period that the Americans bombed the city, which had already been bombed in 1940.
This page tells about the bombing of Amiens on May 27, 1944 by the Americans, 4000 houses had been destroyed.
We notice that the Trogneux establishments remained open during the German occupation (ads : 1 (1940) 2 (1943) 3 (1943) 4 (1944) 5 (1944) (18 rue Duméril is currently 12 place notre Dame). And Jean Trogneux was still competing in tennis. However, there had been the battle of Amiens from May 20 to June 8, 1940. From May 20, 1940 to August 31, 1944, Amiens had suffered four years of occupation by the Wehrmacht with its attendant humiliations, shortages, restrictions, despoilment, stigmatization, repression, deportation and extermination. It was liberated by the British and the FFI on August 31, 1944. 25% of the city was destroyed, including 60% of the city center. With the population fleeing the city, only about 5,000 inhabitants remained out of a population of 95,000 in 1939 (page Wikipedia). Had the Trogneux family, in part, fled this hell ? Perhaps to Algiers ? |
![]() |
Renaud Dély and Marie Huret published in 2020 the book "Les Macron du Touquet-Elysée-Plage". It reads "I first sympathized with Brigitte's parents, well-to-do bourgeois shopkeepers; then it was with the boys Jean-Claude and his brother Jean-Michel that I have woven confides Jacques Noyer, 93, the dean of Le Touquet, promoted to bishop of Amiens (1987-2003)" (link). |
![]() |
[F&D500p4] This relationship [between Emmanuel and his grandmother] is akin to family instruction, now violently opposed by the government.
[F&D499p10] In "Les Macron" [Fayard 2017], it is stated that Emmanuel Macron was educated at the elementary school in his neighborhood, the Delpech school. No class photo from these elementary school years is known [now we know one]. Then, when he entered middle school, the child would have been schooled at La Providence where he would have immediately bonded with Renaud Dartevelle [link], the main witness of these "green years" who however evokes a "quite superficial relationship", while specifying to Hervé Algalarrondo to have been received "at his parents' house". About these years of college, it was reported that Macron did his internship at the end of the third year in Paris, in publishing, at Bordas. And it was during the presentation of his internship report that he would have caught the eye of "Brigitte"... |
![]() |
André Louis Auzière (or André-Louis) [F&D501p6]
He was a bank executive at the Crédit du Nord in Lille, then director of the Banque française du commerce extérieur in Strasbourg. ("As if he had not existed," see Chapter 9). Jean-Louis André Roger Auzière [F&D501p9] : In contrast to André, there is no shortage of sources for writing the biography of Jean-Louis, André, who was born on February 28, 1943 in Meudon (Hauts-de-Seine), the same day - a February 28 - as André Louis. After studying law and foreign languages, Jean-Louis Auzière made a career in the luxury goods industry, where he successively held positions as sales and marketing director at Fabergé (1972-1978), then Revlon (1978-1981), before joining Parfums Grès as General Manager (1981-1987). Still in the same sector, he launched and chaired Indipar in Jouy-en-Josas (Yvelines), while also joining various professional organizations, having served as General Secretary of the Federation of crystal and mixed glass factories and of the Table Arts Committee. He has been a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996), Knight of the Order of Merit (2012), and was sworn in before the Court of Appeal of Caen in February 2021, thus becoming a judicial conciliator in the jurisdiction of Lisieux (Calvados). |
|
![]() |
I'm leaning towards something related to the secret service for a one-time mission that corresponds to reversing the order of first names.
Sometimes they also use deleting a letter in the name or replacing one letter with another. Also keep the birthday. It's not a "legend" per se, but it avoids cross-referencing and if the cover falls, it allows the mistake or the name of use to be invoked without embarrassment.
The fact that Jean-Louis Auzière was a French Foreign Trade Advisor (1983 and 1996) could correspond to functions held in parallel "under cover" and "a minima" at the BFCE i.e. Natixis, under a slightly modified identity. |
Years | Person - City - Street |
![]() |
1975 | Auzière A - Issy-les-Moulineaux - 1 rue Claude Matrat | |
1977-1984 | Auzière André - Croix - 5 resid. Flanders | |
| Auzière André - Strasbourg - 26 rue Lorraine Meinau | |
| Auzière André - Truchtersheim - 4 rue des coquelicots | |
| Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 17 rue St Simon | |
2003-2004 | Auzière André and Brigitte- Amiens - 66 bis rue Boucher de Perthes |
![]() ![]() To the left, a recent book by Odette Ducarre, published by Robert Morel, featuring the book by André Auzière (link). At right, two pages from this book. It was part of the "Collection O" : "Round books, created by Odette Ducarre, 96 pages, 6 cm in diameter, bound by a 3 cm diameter brass ring, patent pending for all countries" (link). |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Louis Auzière, his career plan.
![]() His appointment in the Official Journal of French Equatorial Africa of November 15, 1947 (link) |
After studying classical letters and a master's degree in these subjects (dissertation on "L'amour courtois"), she brilliantly passed her CAPES in classical letters, which allowed her to teach French at the prestigious Lycée La Providence in Amiens. [...] In detail, there are several minor variations. [...] One of the media writes: "Brigitte Macron's qualifications: agrégée de Lettres Classiques".
DISCUSSION - The blurring of dates. No matter how hard we look:
[...] By searching exhaustively on the internet, one learns for sure that Brigitte Trogneux is not a holder of the CAPES, but of the CAFEP. [...] However, the CAFEP [Certificat d'Aptitude au Professorat de l'Enseignement Privé] exam was only created in 1995. |
![]() |
The Blangy property belonged to Jean (Georges) Trogneux and his wife Simone Pujol, as indicated in A directory from before 1973, "Trogneux J confis av Mail", the subscriber's trade being confectioner, they are indeed Jean-Michel's parents, the pastry cooks of Amiens. They lived there occasionally, in a villa on a vast 3,142 m2 plot of land with a warehouse. In 1973, the couple installed their youngest son Jean-Michel, aged 28, perhaps returning from the USA, who set up, or was offered, a hardware business project, which we can assume corresponded to a previously acquired qualification (Chapter 25). Lodged at goodwill by daddy-mummy in Blangy during the first year, a lease is established in May 1974 for 15 years in favor of Picardie Métal.
![]() ![]() Picardy Metal lease with Jean Trogneux, extract from the mortgages. The domain, is subdivided into smaller plots in 1983, proof of the stop of the company Picardie Metal at this date (it is dissolved the following year). This subdivision looks like a subdivision company, to sell or rent to several third parties. The warehouse (plots 139 and 142) was sold to SCI Blangy-Tronville in 1983. ![]() ![]() To the left is the Picardie Metal warehouse. On the right, the land register, at the end of Rue du Mail, with the 1983 division (link) (this is the total of the surfaces of these parcels, which makes 3,142 m2) + view by Google Map (link). |
She learns that the college of Truchtersheim is looking to replace a French teacher who must be absent for a few weeks, neither one, nor two, Brigitte is in. She had never given a private lesson before, but discovered that she loved teaching and, even better, that she was gifted. The students love her. Brigitte has found both an audience and a profession.
Without a CAPES, however, it was impossible to land a tenured position in a public school. Luckily, private schools abound in the land of the Concordat and the storks. Brigitte was recruited by the Protestant college Lucie Berger, located in Petite France, a charming district of the Alsatian capital along the Ill River. |
![]() Beauvais, the prefecture of Oise, is 66 km south of Amiens, halfway to Paris. In March 1984, Jean-Michel lived in Beauvais with his wife Véronique Dreux and their two children Jean-Jacques and Valérie Trogneux. His three other children, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière live in Croix, near Lille, with their mother Brigitte Auzière. In 1984, or a little later, Jean-Michel moved to Truchtersheim, near Strasbourg, with his three Auzière children, and from then on he passed himself off as their mother... And the trips to Honfleur (Appendix A 42). |
This general meeting of the Arasse company, a family business, takes place in its headquarters, in a room in the rue des Vergeaux in Amiens. It is May 25, the vacations are approaching, the atmosphere is relaxed. The participants, members of the Trogneux family, know each other very well, nobody is embarrassed by the fact that Jean-Michel is present under the aspect of Brigitte. We are in 2007, it has been about 25 years that the whole family is aware. The meeting goes smoothly, all the good decisions are taken without conflict, and we gradually go into pre-apéro mode, gags and jokes starting to colonize the seriousness of the notary.
Signing time comes in the midst of an aperitivo transition. A pen is slipped into Brigitte's right hand, and she keeps her glass of bubbly in her left hand. She signs, as she is so used to doing as a teacher. It is then that the treasurer, who remained on his first glass, realizes that Jean-Michel made a mistake and that he has inadvertently affixed his female signature. Sapristi! What to do? The decision is quickly made to limit ourselves to asking the clumsy teller to add, while momentarily regaining his momentarily regaining his senses, his old claw Jean-Michel. There is little space left, so much the worse if it overflows in margin. And for the duplicate, no more blunders, we stay on two signatures... Nobody will pay attention to this detail, we think then. |
On the left photo, the fly, proudly put forward, appears padded, the Adam's apple is not very apparent, there is no trace of beard and on the right photo the chest appeared discreet. Above all, the resemblance between the photo on the left and the one in the center is striking enough to raise the question of the confusion of identity of the two people.
This set in motion a process of reflection that led to the opening of this new hypothesis. ![]() ![]() Hypothesis rejected (after rejection of the 1977 photo) |
We then asked ourselves the question "what obstacle is there to this hypothesis of a mother with the appearance of a man ?" On the spot, our little citizen team answered none, hence the first title. Two days later, on January 31 (actually the night before), we found this obstacle : Françoise Noguès appears shorter than the 1977 protester. The potential use of heels or a slope of the street does not allow to be sure. Another clue is that Françoise Noguès' chest is less "discreet" than estimated in the previous comparative photo. It is therefore likely that she is not in the 1977 photo and that the resemblance of the faces is coincidental. |
After the previous addition on January 29, here is the one on February 6, with these photo comparisons :
The woman with the tambourine from 1977 and Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel Macron's mother in 2017. Similarities, including the same pout in the left and right photos, and also potential differences such as the earlobe, smaller waist in 1977. Here we come to compare Emmanuel Macron's mother with a participant of the 1977 gay pride other than the one at the beginning of this chapter. If the comparison appears better, it remains uncertain. The reader will be able to judge this, as he will be able to judge the complementary elements brought on February 12 in the following chapter. Hypothesis rejected (after rejecting the 1977 photo) | ![]() ![]() Two photos ( 1 2 2 bis) from the 1977 gay pride event, previously reported in Chapter 14.
|
![]() ![]() |
I have long suspected that the Auzière children were born in the United States, more precisely in New York, where former flight attendant and painter Catherine Audoy (the real mother) resided.For the official version, Tiphaine would have been born in Amiens in 1984, while at the time her parents were supposed to live in Strasbourg. She had to obtain a certificate of French nationality before taking the lawyer's exam in 2009, a procedure that is only justified when there is a doubt.
I'm pretty sure she has dual French-American citizenship, as do her brother and sister. The fact that the nationality of the 3 Auzière children is not mentioned on the court summons, while that of Brigitte Macron and her double Jean-Michel Trogneux is specified, only reinforces my opinion. |
The presidential couple is in Honfleur (Calvados) where the head of state has offered a small bath of crowd after having lunch at the Bistro des Artistes in the old town. Questioned by reporters to know if he was tired as implied by several of his relatives, Emmanuel Macron brushed aside any decline in form. "I'm not letting go of anything, I'm just like all our fellow citizens I'm attached to the balance of my family and the habits we have, he explained at the microphone of BFMTV. It's been more than 20 years that I come to this same café and I will continue to do so. I was there when I was campaigning, I was there last year, I will continue to be". |
![]() Let's call BT53 Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953, JMT her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux, JLA Jean-Louis Auzière, JMT's great friend, BA Brigitte Auzière, JLA's niece, ALA André Louis Auzière, the groom of 1974, supposedly nephew of JLA (cf. genealogical tree seen previously). BT53 died in early 1961 as understood in Chapter 28. Her parents and siblings did not accept her death and did not declare it. For the relatives, they invented a tale according to which she would be alive, gone to study abroad (Algeria, USA ? BT53 would she be supposed to accompany JMT?). As time passed, they needed to show strong evidence of her existence. That's where JLA comes in. He has his niece BA who has, for some time, been in a relationship with JMT and would like to marry him and have children. With his knowledge of the secret service (Appendix A 31), he devises a rocky marriage that would satisfy both his niece and the Trogneux parents. BA will be the bride, serving as BT53's clone for this wedding ostentatiously shown to the small world of Touquet, which has had the opportunity to know neither BA nor BT53 and cannot notice the substitution. And JLA will play the role of the groom, holding the role of the groom ALA and, by delegation, that of the real partner of BA, that is to say JMT. The latter is present at the ceremony as the declared brother of the bride and her witness. The Trogneux parents are satisfied: their youngest daughter is "resurrected" and the future children of the fictional couple ALA-BT53, in reality those of JMT-BA, will be their grandchildren. They can continue to make believe in the existence of their daughter BT53, nobody will go and check, since she lives far away, in Croix in the suburbs of Lille. But, from time to time, the grandchildren will be shown. BA is also happy: she will not be a single mother, she has, socially, a husband, her children will have, socially, a father, nobody will go to check her maiden name, nor will they suspect that JMT, who shares her bed from time to time, is not ALA. This solution, twisted and hardly imaginable, but finally, in its own way, brilliant, is accepted. The mayor of Le Touquet, Léonce Deprez, does everything to satisfy his great tennis buddy Jean Trogneux (Appendix A 28). The photo is retouched with the means of the time. And the arrival, from the following year, of the first of the couple's grandchildren consolidates the subterfuge. Friends and acquaintances, even brothers and sons-in-law of the Trogneux parents, believe it... Did the marriage really take place? Probably, with registration in the civil status, the mayor not being looking... The extract of the marriage certificate would therefore be authentic. The late divorce ending this union also fits into the scenario. Léonce Deprez was mayor of Le Touquet from 1969 to 1995, then again from 2001 to 2008. Between 1995 and 2001, he could not pronounce the divorce. Before he finished his last mandate, he was the (best) accomplice, indispensable, to act the divorce of the union of 1974 before declaring, in 2007, the marriage of Emmanuel and Brigitte. As for the death of ALA in 2019, the means of the State allowed to invent it and to register it in the civil status to complete the manipulations of the parents and the mayor. Finally, it was not JMT who first wanted to reincarnate BT53, it was his parents, with the undeclared death and marriage of 1974. JMT only supported them from 1961 to 1984. In 1984/1985, with the disappearance of BA, he succeeded in conferring, in addition to his administrative existence, a real body to his sister, fulfilling at the same time the will of his parents and his own desire to change sex... In this new scenario, the role of the Trogneux parents becomes the driving force. The complicity of the mayor of Le Touquet is essential: he covers the marriage, the divorce and the remarriage, allowing the falsifications, or more precisely the non verification of identity. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() (Ignace) |
We therefore retain the very strong belief that the mother's maiden identity is Brigitte Auzière, daughter of Louis and Renee Costes. It would be very surprising if new clues could come later to contradict it. |
Below is the sheet before modification and, opposite, after.
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() Rue Saint-Pierre in Beauvais. In the 1980s the "Tentations" store was on the opposite sidewalk [postcard]. Now it would stand at the red-hung restaurant [Google Street]. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Left, ad in the "Confiserie" section of the yellow pages of the Somme directories in 1984 and 1985. Before 1984, it was not there. From 1986, the store is absent from the directories. In the center, mention in the white pages of 1984, also from 1981 to 1983. On the right, Véronique Dreux, who was Madame Trogneux from 1980 to 1987, in Beauvais and La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil |
Years | Person - City - Street |
![]() |
| Trogneux J. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail
(this is Jean, Jean-Michel's father) | |
1972-1978 | Trogneux J-M. confis - Blangy-Tronville - Av Mail | |
| Trogneux Jean-Michel - Beauvais - 4 r Saint Pierre | |
| Trogneux Jean-Michel - La Neuville-sur-Oudeuil - r Boulanger | |
| Trogneux Jean-Michel - Amiens - 14 rue des Vergeaux |
![]() ![]() The probable mother of the three Auzière children. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Touching up photographic prints in the silver era was commonplace among professional photographers. Links : 1 2 3. So for the family photo from late 1954, Jean-Michel could have been absent at the time of the shot and could have been added thanks to a photo of him from the same time. And the little girl Brigitte could have had a bad pose and been replaced by an extract from another photo of the group. This remains, for our investigation, anecdotal, incidental ... |
![]() ![]() ![]() Le Touquet-Paris-Plage, a seaside resort with 4,300 inhabitants, welcomes up to 250,000 people in the summer. On the left, the Westminster Hotel, where the guests of the 1974 wedding (link) and those of the 2007 wedding ("champagne à flots," link) met (photo from the page Wikipedia of Le Touquet). In the center, the villa Brigitte Macron inherited is called Monéjan (link), after the first names of her parents Simone and Jean... ... and after Jean Monnet, who gave his name to the main avenue of Le Touquet (it is colored in yellow, the villa Monéjan is at the top left, the beach is below, Google Map) |
![]() |
![]() Except in the case of a woman with a particularly elongated face, this is constant. Even if there is a surgery to break the angle of the lower jaw and/or decrease the relief of the chin, the length of the lower tier remains unchanged, more or less. This is what gives Brigitte Macron that strange look, and the reason for the wigs (not extensions) that go to the shoulders. This is, in my opinion [that of the brigittologist Maria, who speaks here], the simplest way to recognize if a skull is that of a man or a woman, by simple proportion. |
![]() | To conclude, in keeping with the introduction to Chapter 13, let us conclude thus : taken in isolation, these masculine characteristics are not enough to say that Brigitte is a woman. But taking them all together (those of Chapter 13 and this Appendix), if she had been born a woman (we've seen that this is not the case), she would be an extremely rare phenomenon !!! Understandably, Natacha Rey began by building on these very astonishing findings. |
![]() | A correspondent writes me: "Please tell me this is a photo-montage.... How could a personality recover from such a slip ?" This photo is the one numbered 10 out of 13, signed Dominique Jacovides / BestImage, in the slideshow of a page on the "Gala" website, published at the end of August 2019. Photo n°12 is of the same type. Click on the image to see them. + the photo n°1, by JB Autissier, found below ("very chic "Gala""). |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Tucking is a technique where an individual hides the shape of his penis so that it cannot be seen through his clothing. This practice is often used by transgender women. There are fertility-related side effects caused by tucking, such as reduced sperm count. Some types of clothing are designed specifically to conceal the penis, such as gaffs or boxers. |
![]() ![]() Without counting on the 62 .400 euros per year incurred on public funds in hairdresser and makeup artist costs to ensure the facade renovation that is required, a smooth skin and a shiny scalp to the presidential couple. That is to say, the equivalent of 4 smics per month for Brigitte's styling. Because after all, Bel Ami, You and your cougar with the hairpiece elegance, your pimbic who parades in Prada, your "peroxide cagole", to use the qualifiers of the "Financial Times", are worth it ! ![]() We can say that it is really the bouquet, especially since your Brigitte plays us to the good Samaritans, with an ostentatious charity absolutely dripping with hypocrisy, in a poor play of boulevard theater, via its operation of com of the "yellow coins". Thus, she does not hesitate to appeal to the solidarity and national generosity of the vile populace, so that it contributes by its miserable obole to restore your tarnished image at little cost, to maintain as well as possible in place your stature, to perpetuate all your imposture. ![]() ![]() The union of this highly dubious duo, which we were portrayed as a beautiful romance, a touching and exceptional fusional idyll, a heartbreaking hymn to difference, a shattering love story in the water of roses, as passionate as it is unabashed, where the love defies the conveniences, whereas it is only a summit of indecency out of any propriety, was indeed according to the point of view, as precocious as late and should have in all logic, fallen under the blow of the law... But of law, it would not know how to be question of it for these good people above any suspicion! However, it is not a minor fault, when at the bend of a very bad play, in a combination of circumstances more than aggravating, we let ourselves be tempted by providence and that we suddenly feel an irresistible as well as frightful attraction for the young scarecrow who declaims his text on the boards, that we see ourselves struck by a flash of lightning for our youthful Jupiter. No decidedly, it is not a commonplace thing when one makes the court instead of dispensing its courses and that one surprises oneself to seduce behind the scenes, behind the curtains, one of its pupils, a young youth still virgin of 14 years, to accomodate this cuistre between its thighs, whereas one is oneself in the flower of the age, that to be his mother of 39 years and that a 25 years gap of age separates us ! |
I could not admire Fulbert's simplicity enough, and I was as amazed as if he had delivered a tender sheep to a hungry wolf; for not only did he charge me with instructing his niece, but he gave me the mission of chastising her and chastising her strongly : And what was it but to open up the whole career of my wishes, to offer me the last means of victory, even if I were reluctant to seize it; and, in case I could not touch Heloise by my caressing speeches, to bend her by threats and chastisements? But two things easily diverted Fulbert from all suspicion and fear of any danger: the virtue of his niece and the reputation so well established of my continence.
Painting by Jean-Baptiste Goyet, 1829. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() Brigitte Macron's perversity and her mania for accusatory reversal lead her to see herself as a battered woman. We have already seen this elsewhere (notably in Appendix A 17 and in her January 2022 interview Chapter 14): She considers herself a victim of harassment (BestImage photo, links : 1 2 3) |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() By the way, for those who know how to read, it is even written in all letters by the manufacturers on their mask boxes that they are not medical devices and that they do not protect in any way against viral attacks! Legally, the mask manufacturers certainly do not want to be held responsible in case of contamination with Covid-19... It is a guarantee for them not to be condemned in justice in case of complaints. In this world, money doesn't lie. "No study proves any usefulness of the mask to prevent viral respiratory diseases, whether indoors or outdoors. Period !" - Prof. Denis Rancourt ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() As the singer Jacques Higelin would say, "Those who are afraid to die are often afraid to live. They breathe cautiously while waiting for the end." What exactly is the meaning of a life cut off from everything that makes it valuable, from what makes it so precious, unique and authentic, namely: emotions, laughter and smiles, carelessness, love, sharing, encounters, escape, discoveries, leisure? From now on, we are immersed in a program of death, led by these psychopathic elites, so-called philanthropists in an ultra-controlled, artificial, sanitized and dehumanized society, more and more deprived of love and authentic human relations. In fact, what they fear most is love, because it allows them to create a world that escapes them and that they cannot control. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Do you seriously think that the exponential myriad of cuckolds of vaccination, who do not see the realization of any of the beautiful promises that had been made to them, but suffering sometimes in the depths of their flesh of devastating side effects, or seeing around them the sudden disappearance of loved ones, will continue eternally to swallow McKinsey's snakes and boas constrictors of Big Pharma's shameless lies? One can legitimately doubt it, hypnosis has its limits and the awakening after the hangover is likely to be violent. ![]() You are by far the most destructive virus that has ever entered our lives. |
![]() [photo BelgaImage] |
The great scientist Luc Montagnier exposes the dangers of this vaccination which makes people believe that it fights against the pandemic. However, it is precisely the opposite, it feeds it! Moreover, the variant virus is resistant to vaccination:"The new variants are created by the selection of antibodies produced by vaccination." He also said that the variants are generated by vaccinations:"This is a huge mistake, it is a scientific error and an inexplicable medical error, history will take stock of all this one day, because it is indeed vaccination that created the variant." |
![]() |
![]() December 12 - 1. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease cases seem to be forgotten. I went to read Marc Doyer's tweets. It continues to increase in France, we've now reached about 10 proven cases. And also a case in Belgium, one in Israel, "The scandal will soon go beyond the borders of France". A scandal very much suppressed in our country... P.-S. of December 13 : Marc Doyer and Prof. Luc Montagnier spoke together on Radio Courtoisie (article with 24 min video). Eight cases are proven, Prof. Montagnier believes that it is "a time bomb" and calls, once again, to stop vaccinating. | ![]() Photo from February 22, 2022 at the funeral of Luc Montagnier. Whistleblowers may exaggerate or the facts may prove them wrong, and hopefully so. But it was necessary to alert so that it does not go further... |
![]() Tribute to the unvaccinated by Fernando López-Mirones |
"Men must be warned that they are in danger of death; science becomes criminal." - Albert Einstein in 1946
"Because I know the full potential of RNA, administering it to healthy individuals seems to me to be on the order of madness." - Alexandra Henrion Caude, geneticist and RNA specialist. "The cutoff for stopping a vaccination program is 20 to 25 deaths, and today, in May 2021, we have more than 4,000 deaths" - Prof. Mc Cullough As the geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude aptly puts it, in an extraordinary reversal, we are all presumed sick and contagious, we have lost our right to be presumed healthy automatically. We would all be potential sick people who ignore themselves, like in the classic play "Knock or the Triumph of Medicine" by Jules Romains. A bit like if in justice, the presumption of innocence was definitively banished and that we would be automatically considered as potential criminals... What society can still function on such a postulate? Wearing a mask means accepting to be presumed sick. Paradox of paradoxes in this pseudo-pandemic, if on the one hand we assume that everyone is sick even healthy people, on the other hand, we refuse to treat the real sick! |
![]() |
Recently, it was an international study in Frontiers in Virology that caught his attention, published by several scientists who were surprised by the presence of the PRRA sequence in SARS-CoV-2 RNA and wondered why it was inserted. The scientists in the study did a blast. That is, they "looked for homology with all kinds of sequences that exist," in other words, similarity to other publicly available sequences in public databases. They then discovered that the PRRA sequence matched the sequence ID11652 patented in 2017 by Moderna, under US 958 7003. Among the 13 inventors was Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, a pharmaceutical company that, remember, supplies Covid-19 vaccines internationally...
Those who are accustomed to using the term "conspiracy theorists" at every turn should be reassured. This information has been circulating among mainstream media such as the American newspaper Daily Mail. On February 24, 2022, Stéphane Bancel replied to a Fox News reporter who asked him why a sequence patented by his pharmaceutical company had been found in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 that "scientists are analyzing whether these data are real or not. He did not rule out "the hypothesis of laboratory leakage by accident" and the virus having escaped from the Wuhan laboratory in China during research on gains in function. If he had uttered these words at the beginning of the Covid crisis, would he have been censored as Alexandra Henrion-Caude was?... In any case, it is surprising that such information, if not killed, does not make the headlines... |
Everyone has at least heard of the famous "mythe of the cave" by Greek philosopher Plato.
Let's summarize it in broad strokes: human beings are chained in the depths of a cave. They represent, metaphorically, the ignorance in which the common man is immersed. They have never seen the sun, from which they only receive very weak rays.
very weakened rays. A fire at their backs casts shadows on the walls of the cave, both of themselves and of the surrounding objects, which they take to be reality itself; they wiggle their bonnets like debilitated people, following the
movements of these shadows. They thus represent, according to Plato, the state of cognitive daze in which the overwhelming majority of humanity is immersed.
What is, on this good basis, the job of the philosopher? It is to undo these prisoners of their chains, and to guide them towards the sun of the true Knowledge, metaphorized by the Sun; and which is, in reality, the intelligible Ideas of Philosophy, armed in particular with Mathematics. Which is called, incidentally: freedom. Of course, such an approach is risky. The prisoner may, at first, not be able to bear the liberation, i.e. the dazzling of the Truth. He may prefer to return to his former condition, and thus have wasted the time of the Philosopher in charge of the Awakening of Consciousness. Worse, he may take it out on the one who, claiming to liberate him, will have violated him in his obscurantist superstitions. But the thing can also happen very well, and the prisoner can free himself for real; illuminated by the adequate Ideas of the Sun of the authentic Knowledge, he can return in the cave with the aim of freeing more than in his turn his fellow men. Nothing is, in short, a foregone conclusion. But finally, it is at one's own risk that one embarks on the task of awakening the captive prisoners of cognitive mirages, main vocation of philosophy. What would be the modern, timely version of the prisoner of the cave? Wouldn't it be, for example, as we say in French, the figure of the beauf slumped in his couch after a day of thankless work, to consume without interruption, the eye riveted to his giant flat screen television "the chronic torrent of unformed information" ? Answer: yes, we do have a modern version of the good old prisoner of the cave. [...] The truth is that we have been living, for the last two years, in the most gigantic hoax that has ever been perpetrated against humanity: in the most crude simulacrum that has ever darkened the view of our fellow human beings. This simulacrum has a name, "pandemic," and a trademark, "Covid 19." I've been putting the word "pandemic" in quotation marks for over a year. And, for many months now, I've not even called it a "pandemic", but an IQ test again the most constraining that has ever been put to the cognitive abilities of homo sapiens. The good news is that this test is profoundly "egalitarian" and that I have met peasants from Correze who perfectly understand what the situation we have been living for the last two years is all about, and Bac+12 students who have made a big mistake on the same subject. |
|
In the allegory of the cave the world of culture and philosophy is completely separated from the world of beliefs and superstitions; there is no relationship or filiation between the sphere of enlightenment and rational knowledge and the obscurantist sphere of the irrational. At the bottom of the cave, men chained from head to toe since their childhood elaborate alone their false ideas about the shadows. Whereas in "The Cultural Production of Ignorance" for the contemporary world, the misconceptions propagated by the media to the masses are elaborated by highly educated people and quite often by scientific luminaries. In reference to ancient Greece, Plato and Socrates [opposite, painting by David, 1787] the sophists, ("persons using sophisms, specious arguments or reasoning to deceive or delude"), we have for the sophists of today, invited on TV sets, eminent scientists, doctors and experts of all kinds barded with titles and diplomas.
As Mehdi Belhaj Kacem deplores about the intellectuals of his rank, we must make the sad observation that they have put themselves en masse at the service of Big Pharma and finance to impose the "pandemic" sham and vaccine coercion with an ineffective and dangerous biotechnological product. The number of lucid, courageous and critical scientists and intellectuals has unfortunately remained too sparse. If knowledge was spontaneously put at the service of the economic power, the political power did not hesitate to brandish administrative threats to ensure at least the silence or neutrality of many academics. In spite of the awareness of the imposture, the mass of graduate sophists remained compact and overwhelming to stir up in the caves the great historical fears of contagion and the specter of death, thus allowing the prolongation and extension of the vaccination campaign, even when its inefficiency became more and more evident. Mobilized on TV sets, they stigmatized the non-vaxxed as the cause of the contagion and tried to impose experimental mRNA injections on everyone, even infants... |
Didn't you, even for a minute, begin to find it suspicious, to say the least, that 24 hours a day the media is only telling us about "Covid 19," which was killing no more than a seasonal flu, and rather less? Didn't you find it somewhat strange that the very
Agnès Buyzin (now paid by Bill Gates) to ban hydroxychloroquine from January 2020, the second most used drug in the world for 70 years, especially in Africa? Then the banning of Azithromycin, Ivermectin, and even, recently, of vitamin D (on the pretext that it would be an "endocrine disruptor")? That, for the first time in the history of medicine, doctors are forbidden both to treat and to prescribe? That we continue, in the midst of the worst "pandemic" that ever was, to close hospital beds by the thousands (more than 17,500 under the Macron era) ? That our president, in the midst of a devastating "pandemic" on all sides, does not allocate one more cent to the public hospital, but nearly 3 billion euros to the mass media, including 500 million just recently? And so many other "details", more and more dubious, more and more anti-scientific, more and more irrational; and in which you will have given, head completely down. [...]
By calling for mandatory vaccination, your responsibility is this time directly engaged. It is also so that you, as well as all the other intellectuals who have supported the absurd governmental measures of the last two years, may bear this responsibility with full knowledge of the facts, that I am writing this open letter. None of you will be able to say, "I didn't know" anymore. None. |
![]() |
![]() It's 9pm on this November 12 and I decide to give special importance to what I wrote this afternoon. I feel this information is momentous, more so than any of the above. "Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is a degeneration of the central nervous system characterized by the accumulation of a prion (an abnormal form of a protein that can transmit the disease). The incubation period can be years or even decades before balance and sensitivity problems appear, followed by dementia. The outcome is consistently fatal within approximately one year." (page wikipedia). The authorities have been prevaricating for months to claim that there would be no proven deaths from the "vaccines" Covid, only coincidences, even though there have been thousands of suspicious deaths (reported or not) in France (see Nov. 1 - 6). There is no doubt about it, the fact that this disease is almost non-existent in France and that there have been at least six patients in a short period of time following Pfizer injections shows that Pfizer's product is definitely responsible. All the more so as other cases have been detected, notably in the USA. And the victims are young people without comorbidity, in good health. So rather than continue to promote the 3rd dose and cause willingly new deaths for this and other causes, the urgency is to stop everything. Never has it been more blatantly obvious that these injections are poisons and those who refuse to stop them when they have the power to do so can only be considered criminals. Unless this information from the six cases can be proven wrong. |
![]() |
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease of humans is the equivalent of trembling disease of sheep and bovine spongiform encephalopathy or mad cow disease of cattle, with a pattern of transmission described opposite.
Appearing in 1986 in English cattle herds, it peaked at 37,280 cattle in 1992 in that country, spreading to Europe and some other countries. Transmission to humans is discovered in 1996, 232 cases will be diagnosed worldwide [article]. These cases are similar to recent cases detected after mRNA injection, except that the incubation period is much shorter. |
|
![]() |
Warning
A study published in preprint since the writing of this article, co-authored by neurologist C. Moret Chalmin, Prof. L. Montagnier and mathematician J.-C. Pérez confirms the hypothesis that we support here: "Towards the emergence of a new form of neurodegenerative Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Sixteen cases of CJD reported a few days after a COVID-19 "vaccine". The findings of this study will be presented at the 16th World Congress of Controversies in Neurology (CONy) to be held virtually in London on March 24-27, 2022. Note It will be recalled that Luc Montagnier and Alexandra Henrion-Caude had announced that they had discovered, during the sequencing of the SARS-CoV2 genome carried out shortly after its release : for the former, HIV and malaria sequences; for the latter, a sequence present at the furin cleavage site, found identically in a patent filed by Moderna in 2016, as confirmed in an article published on February 21, 2022 in the journal Frontiers of Virology, which demonstrates that the probability of a natural origin of the virus containing such a patented sequence is statistically zero. |
The shadow of this multinational consulting firm that is as opaque as it is tentacular looms over Emmanuel Macron's career since the Attali Commission [in 2007] to the organization of the vaccination campaign (as revealed by Politico, January 6, 2021), through the sale of Alstom, but also that of Technip, without forgetting the presidential election of 2017, the high point of this collaboration. In the MacronLeaks, we indeed identify "a score of very active employees of the firm. Partners ("associates") seasoned as well as young enthusiasts. To write the candidate's program as well as to manage the stewardship" (McKinsey, a firm in Macron's footsteps, February 6, 2021 [link]). [...]
From an operational standpoint, Emmanuel Macron's candidacy can, to some extent, be seen as a product delivered in kit form by McKinsey & Company. |
That the booksellers, who, to their great detriment, have walled themselves up in the covidist rituals for two years do not put on sale the many books that have come out on this subject (Perronne, Raoult, Kennedy, Fouché etc.) is perplexing! Contrary to the me(r)dias of the high road, they are not however directly financed by the billionaires. This is apparently a phenomenon of self-censorship, of great significance for the uncertain future of the industry. It is a little-noticed aspect of the West's ongoing cultural suicide... |
In mathematics, chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions, a phenomenon generally illustrated for the general public, by "the butterfly effect". For such systems, minute differences in initial conditions lead to completely different results, generally making any long-term prediction impossible. Thus the illusory idea that it was possible to predict the number of deaths in a population by simulating frustrating models, based on roughly estimated parameters, was considered by somewhat serious scientists to be a vast joke. After all, as Milan Kundera wondered:"But what is "serious" ? Is serious the one who believes in what he makes others believe". This is indeed the drama that we have experienced during this Covid crisis, because the authorities wanted to believe people who made them believe chimeras. Thus we had the disaster and chaos. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() Communiqué. We inform you that the lawyer Virginie de Araujo-Recchia was arrested this morning and placed in police custody. We have no idea on what basis such a measure was ordered and what she was accused of. Since this morning we are trying to find out where she was taken. All our efforts in this regard remain in vain. Thank you for running this press release without changing a single word. We will keep you informed as soon as possible. The lawyers who are working with her. Right: in 2018, the yellow vests, the lack of hospital resources, the repression... |
There has been a significant increase in the number of police custody in the recent period against lawyers or journalists. In the absence of serious or sufficient evidence, the state tendency is thus to intimidate these two professions, which nevertheless constitute one of the foundations of any Democracy. [...]
The interviewer asked me to outline my "ideology". To which I replied that it was not ideology but proven and justified facts that I have been meticulously cataloguing for two years. All the hearings of the International Court of Public Opinion/Grand Jury have allowed me to hear the testimonies of some of the world's greatest experts in scientific and medical matters, in psychopathology and psychology, in history, economics, geostrategy as well as the testimonies of victims from the present and the past. I have personally collected testimonies from victims' parents, caregivers and French firemen in order to present them to the Grand Jury. It is about expertise, professionals, witnesses, victims. It is not about ideology. The only goal is to find the truth. [...] Some media outlets have reported a "terrorist dossier" and, with my name cited as "lawyer representing various figures in conspiracy circles" or even "extremist groupings", the defamatory nature of this amalgam will not have escaped anyone. I will not leave it at that because it is pure defamation and intent to harm but I will request a right of reply. |
![]() |
|
Since the beginning of the epidemic, the official narrative has been that the response to the crisis has been similar around the world. In other words, there are no early treatments, containment and masking are necessary measures, and finally, vaccines are the only solution. As a cardiologist specializing in internal medicine and a world-renowned expert on the Covid-19 pandemic, I can say that nothing could be further from the truth, that this is propaganda, and that there are early treatments. [...]
Concerning vaccination, not only is its effectiveness still to be proven, but it has caused many side effects (still not taken into account in most countries). [...] On July 12, 2021, President Macron's peremptory assertions had nothing scientific about them (I have everything at hand to prove it), but nevertheless prompted many French people to get vaccinated. We got the same message in the United States: two vaccines and you get your freedom back. To discuss all these issues, not to mention confinements and different vaccine passports, I proposed to be heard by the French Parliament. My proposal was not accepted, although I testified at U.S. Senate hearings in 2020 and 2022. |
![]() |
At left, distribution of adverse events by age. 54% for those under 50, for whom Covid risks are very low...
Another report from the ANSM shows that, of the 30. 178 serious cases recorded in France for Pfizer vaxxin alone, as of August 25, there are 1544 deaths (544 of unknown origin), 1213 life-threatening, 9400 hospitalizations, 51 cardiac arrests, 1134 strokes, 1261 pulmonary embolisms, 286 spontaneous miscarriages, 806 myocarditis, 1163 pericarditis, 1215 thromboses, 1719 gynecological disorders, A site lists some of the "deaths by vaxxination." |
My goodness I am glad to see this show!!!
I have been prone since my 1st pfizer injection to spasmophilia attacks, or something close to it. The 1st one was extremely violent, 3 hours of convulsion starting 5 minutes after the injection. I was at the vaccinodrome of Lille Grand Palais and left without having been admitted to the emergency room. Without any proof of what had happened to me other than the photo of the liaison sheet of the Sdis doctor that I had demanded to take.
I then fought thanks to my doctor so that the pharmacovigilance accepts to take into account the incident. 4 other crises since July, a strong weight gain. My doctor wrote me a prescription for a contraindication to the vaccine recall... without effect and I found myself classified as antivax and without a health pass on February 15. And the medical profession as a whole explains to me that it is psychological and that there can be no link with the vaccine. Amazing.
The medical check-ups don't show anything in particular and so I am told that I have to do the booster with a little relaxation. General blindness. Fear has taken the place of a rational attitude. I am angry and worried about what the aftermath might be for my health. My spouse is traumatized by the successive crises she has witnessed. She is therefore not vaccinated. And so we are suspect in the eyes of the majority, convinced that we are conspiracy theorists. I am going to get closer to these groups. I am 50 years old and had never had this type of health problem. I have never doubted our political and governmental authorities and I have never doubted our health care system. Now I do. And the media brainwashing for 2 years has been surreal. It has sown fear and done far more harm than the virus. I want to join these people and fight to stop this blindness. |
Antibodies to the Spike protein do and will contribute to EDA phenomena caused by infection following vaccination. This can manifest as acute or chronic autoimmune and inflammatory conditions worsening the severity of the disease and the overall pandemic situation. One thing is certain, the government and the High Council of Public Health (HCSP) have no interest in the ADE effect of facilitating antibodies being able to be demonstrated in countries that have practiced over-vaccination like France. |
In reality, very few manage to escape the hierarchical grid of submission to the established order. In his famous experiment to assess the degree of obedience of citizens, Professor Milgram succeeded in getting his (paid) human guinea pigs to inflict punishment in the form of electric shocks on designated culprits. In reality, the experimenters and the "culprits" were actors and no electric shocks were delivered. But the guinea pigs were unaware of this and eventually obeyed the inane orders given to them.
Only 15% of them refused to obey. Look closely, this is about the percentage of French people who still resist to the first dose of vaccine. When the winds have changed, when the old established order has totally collapsed (which cannot fail to happen), it is they, the resistance fighters, who will impose the new order, which the relieved masses will rally around. The only important task for the resistance fighters is to prepare this new world, calmly, quietly, patiently. Their time is coming. |
![]() In black the countries, including France, where the mask was mandatory, in red those where it was not. And a tweet from Sivano Trotta recalling the unnecessary health constraints of May 2021 when in May 2022 there are twice as many Covid cases and no constraints... "People wearing masks were unconsciously retaining droplets of the virus in their masks and inhaling them back into their lungs" (link). | ![]() Ban early treatment, muzzle, force injections experimental injections, confine, prohibit movement, discriminate, they're willing to invent another crisis to start over. |
"Vaccinating children with a vaccine that does not prevent transmission to protect people who are already vaccinated will go down in the annals of medical stupidity." Laurent Taubiana, epidemiologist. |
The vaccines were granted, at the European level, a conditional MA, which as its name suggests was issued with conditions :
So conditional MA + the vaccines distributed in the West are all in experimental phase, in phase 3 more exactly (3 out of 4). Normally, the development of a drug is carried out by the manufacturer's laboratory, at its own expense, and above all, the patients are subject to serious surveillance (and are not released into the wild 1/4 hour after the injection). The current pharmaco-vigilance is almost non-existent. The follow-up of the vaccinated subjects = nothing, whereas normally there should be a regular follow-up to be able to pass in phase 4. None of the usual rules for the development of a drug (or a vaccine) have been respected. It is a total opacity. For prion diseases, nothing can obviously be excluded since pharmacovigilance has not been carried out. Professor Montagnier spoke about this and he is not the only one. The information must go back up, and in France as in many countries, autopsies are not performed, which would give vital information. Here is a quick summary of the facts (this is not an opinion) |
![]() Many studies show that ivermectin's efficacy in early treatment of Covid is better than vaxxins, and this is supported by statistics, especially in India (source). But no study has said that it is a miracle treatment, whereas it has been said to be for vaxxins ("All vaccinated, all protected"). On the right, questioning the July 8, 2022, assassination of Shinzo Abe, the former Japanese prime minister (July 12 tweet opposite, article from July 29). |
![]() |
Brigitte Macron returns to her relationship with Professor Didier Raoult and takes the opportunity to bend the neck of certain rumors. After specifying that neither she nor her husband have been tested, as they have no symptoms, the President's wife says she has not "taken her daughter to be treated in Marseille by Professor Raoult nor asked the President to go there to meet him." Now that is clear! Then, she confides that she did indeed receive a call from the scientist. "He treated several of my friends and one of them gave him my number". She tells our confreres that he reassured about the health of these friends in question and that he discussed with her this famous chloroquine treatment. However, Brigitte Macron is careful not to give an opinion on its effectiveness. "No treatment to date works," she concluded. |
In France the problem has been solved upstream: there are no studies on ivermectin, they have been banned so we don't know. Despite almost 100% results, both in prophylaxis and curative in 2 Ehpads in the Paris region at the very beginning of the epidemic (Bernigaud and Loué), in the middle of the Ehpads hecatomb, Inserm refused the proposed studies, when it was so easy for them, with millions of cases, to do a quick, transparent study to show that it does not work! They didn't do it because they didn't need to know. Why didn't they do it? |
January 9, 2021. We received three phone calls from the First Lady of France, who expressed interest with one of our members to [find out] the treatment...
April 20, 2021. We have evidence of phone records and text messages illustrating that he [President Macron] as well as Mrs. Brigitte Macron tried to get things moving but came up against the medical "system" and its potential "grip" on a lost population but also on city doctors tetanized by the threats looming in case of "treatment" other than Doliprane. January 26, 2022. We have text messages from Macron. Doctors in our group have contacted Macron's ministers. Doctors in our group have contacted Madame Macron and have been in direct and constant contact with [her]. And Macron at one point sent us a text message, [via] a former minister who rebroadcast it to us, so we have this text message, "Yes I totally agree. I think the early outpatient track is a good track. But the system is opposite. I'm following this closely." April 23, 2022. [Macron] replied to his minister. [In] a text message that we have at [your] disposal:"Yes I agree with this way of seeing. Unfortunately the system is against it. I'll take care of it"... May 5, 2022. Doctor Alain Branchereau...told the President of the Republic: "I treated [with] azithromycin/zinc, and I had no deaths" At that time, we had sent through a doctor, who was treating one of his ministers, all of our work to Mr. Macron... We know that in February 2021, we were able to count among the conspirators, a famous person who was the President of the Republic! I am going to read you the answer, mail of the president of the Republic to his minister. It is an email that is in our hand, we reserve it in case France Inter has fun saying that it is [a] fake news: "Formidable. I have believed in this for a long time. But the "system" believes in it too little it's crazy. I'm seizing on it. Thank you. I embrace you." [At the same time] one of our doctors who was in direct contact with Madame Brigitte Macron, testified that she too had many people around her who were treated with early outpatient treatment and who had been satisfied with the results. |
The guests have all their vaccines up to date, are happy and proud to be vaccinated, because "it saved them from a severe form"; a severe form of a Covid-19 they have not failed to contract on two or three occasions, nevertheless, this despite the flagship slogan of the Ministry of Health accepted without question: "All vaccinated, all protected"
So, no doubt about it either. Not the slightest question about the government's evolving if not changing communication. Nothing about the fact that the health policy in the unique form of a vaccination solution has in no way proven that it has stopped the contamination or the transmission of the virus. [...] These are indeed real lies that are used to cover the false truths of some who control the bien-pensance. |
![]() The succession of these first three Charlie Hebdo covers could have shown a gradual awareness. It is nothing of the sort, their dates, successively July 28, 2021, July 14, 2021, August 4, 2021, show a great confusion and a lack of awareness. With the big gap: the so-called defenders of freedom have accepted the compulsory vaxxination and apartheid. This media, which so mocked the wife of Georges Pompidou, remained wise to Brigitte Macron : only the right cover made controversy (link). From 2017 to 2022, she changed her meaning... |
[...] Alain Beyrand got to work, as an amateur genealogist seized in his intimate conviction, and provided a synthesis that will be a landmark in this citizen investigation against the media-political system. My interest for this investigation comes from converging coincidences. On the one hand, I am an anti-communist from the beginning. I started the series of now 11 articles chronicling national-covidism at the beginning of March 2020; secondly, I subscribe to Faits & Documents, so I didn't waste time wondering if it was a serious journal; thirdly, I am altersexual (a word of my own invention), so this investigation was particularly relevant to me, and I was relatively expert in this field, and able to distinguish between what falls under transphobia and homophobia, and what falls under the public interest. |
We tell the tormented biography of a lambda character - at first - of the provincial bourgeoisie, who goes through several serious crises of his existence, in 1961, in 1975-77, in 1984-5 and finally in 1991 in Amiens, and each time manages to gather and bounce back, to manage, by an extraordinary stroke of luck, to be the wife of a head of state ! Personally, I have a real admiration for this combative spirit who knew how to cross resounding failures and who paced relentlessly the roads of the north of France to write a destiny so original that he could, later, become a historical figure, in the same way as Casanova, Mesrine or who knows what. Alas, pain (in his entourage), dissimulation and deception were everywhere in this curriculum, and pushed him, in the final phase, into malfeasance, for lack of means to escape the spider's web of lies, a web woven by himself! This is our subject of study.
What is transphobic about revealing and demonstrating that a transsexual has reached the top of society? This is what I fail to understand. Either, those who manipulate this term did not understand the social atmosphere which reigns in the Elysée, or they are perfectly aware of it and only want to discredit the clear-sighted fraction of the French society, i.e. they place themselves as accomplices. I see no other explanation. I am particularly surprised that no feminist movement, and not even an isolated feminist, has, to my knowledge, come to the rescue of Ms. Macron, nor has it taken offense at this biographical presentation until now. Yet, if Ms. Macron is truly a woman, then it is pure misogyny to deny her femininity. It is even, one might imply, the most abject phallocracy to claim that such a high level of social ascension can only be accomplished by a man... Really there is something wrong with this transphobic rumor... |
![]() |
|
Silence rather than yet another lie?
Nor did she take advantage of her two recent interviews on TF1 and RTL to finally clarify the situation, saying how unpleasant it was for her to be denied since she was equated with her brother. Mademoiselle (?) Trogneux has again deliberately chosen silence, a choice that will not interrupt the countless questions and investigations underway, as this subject fascinates so many French people and millions of others, not forgiving her husband for having stated that he wanted to "emmerge to the end" the non-vaccinated and for having declared them non-citizens. There are definitely a lot of people out there looking for Jean-Michel... which could invite itself into the campaign. |
![]() |
that they are lying. We know that they know that we know that they are lying. And yet they persist in lying. |
|
Kyle Kemper (KK) - Look at what Toole [Erin O'Toole, Trudeau's political opponent] is doing compared to what Justin is doing. They're both pushing vaccination right now. And I don't even call it a vaccine, it's a fake vaccine. It doesn't provide immunity, it doesn't stop transmission, therefore it's not a vaccine. It is an experimental biotechnology, magnetic nanotechnology. I am not interested.
Journalist (J) - Well it's interesting that you bring that up because I've been, sort of, following you on Twitter and I've seen some of the responses that you've been giving, not just to your brother Justin Trudeau, but to people who have been tweeting about him. I saw a tweet where you said... Your hashtag "fake vaccine" and your response "Investigate the vaccine, follow the money." This is way beyond Justin. So, having said that..., my question for you is are you implying that your brother, our Prime Minister, is some kind of pawn ? Are you saying that he is controlled. What are your thoughts through this tweet ? KK - The Covid scam is a globally orchestrated phenomenon to... consolidate power and generate huge profits, facilitate more wealth transitions from countries to corporations. I don't know how anyone can deny that. Canada has spent over a trillion dollars, more money than the most unfathomable amounts of money! J - And so you think Justin Trudeau would support that. You think he would support it if he totally knew what the agenda was ? KK - I think in my heart of hearts, it comes back to the hypnosis condition. I really believe that he believes that what he's doing is the right thing even though he knows that it's the World Economic Forum [WEF] agenda. He believes it's the right thing to do. He believes the WEF, you know, the Great Reset [Great Reset], the 4th industrial revolution agenda. You'll own nothing and be happy and we're bringing in a universal basic income. We impose central bank digital currencies on people. We are putting social credit systems on the people. These are incredible... hysterical-tyrannical dreams. And in my opinion, they have been slowly implementing them. And it takes more than governments, governments are just an arm of that. Look at Big Tech, the media, Big Pharma, all working together in this giant, gigantic farce. There is a farce in everything we see now. |
Macron was presented with a choice: either he accepted a PCR test by Russian authorities and was allowed to get closer to Putin, or he refused and had to submit to a stricter social distancing. "We knew very well that this meant no handshake and that long table. But we couldn't accept that they would get their hands on the president's DNA" one of the sources told Reuters. [...] On Thursday, three days after the meeting between Macron and Putin, the Russian leader received Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. The two men shook hands and sat next to each other, separated only by a small coffee table. [article from February 11] |
![]() September 20, 2022, at the United Nations headquarters in New York. Photo Lev Radin - Pacific Press, link. |
| ![]() In 2016, Emmanuel Macron needed to create buzz to prepare his candidacy for the presidential election. The celebrity press pandered to the perversity of a crude divorce followed by a phony complaint that made the front page of these papers on September 21 and, of course, then evaporated...(link). The context is different, but the complaint against Natacha Rey, which was more widely reported, sounds similarly false... |
While after four days the #JeanMichelTrogneux was "deleted from trends by Twitter moderation" [there was] an amplification of the "rumor" internationally starting on December 20 with the Daily Mail followed, two days later, by Reuters for a dispatch that was picked up worldwide. It can be pointed out here that from an external point of view, there is no "rumeur" (a woman suspected or accused of being his brother) easier to "debunk". It would have been enough, to immediately extinguish the fire, for a snapshot
of Brigitte Macron at the side of Jean-Michel Trogneux, alone or with their children (on the occasion of a Christmas Eve for example) was published by the Élysée via an anonymous account, and taken up, under the #JeanMichelTrogneux, by all the accounts linked to La République en marche. We can also be surprised that Tiphaine Auzière did not rise to the occasion, as she systematically does when Brigitte Macron is mocked on her physique [example].
[...] While the Reuters report (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, the first Turkish news channel a Haber (21 December 2021) devoted a story to the case, as did the Russian state news channel Rossiya 24 (formerly Vesti). While the Reuters report (22 December 2021) was picked up by almost all the international press, the first Turkish news channel a Haber (21 December 2021) devoted a story to the affair, as did the Russian state news channel Rossiya 24 (ex-Vesti). [...] Since then, the "affair Jean-Michel Trogneux" has fueled dinners in town, especially in the gay Tout-Paris, on the theme "his wig askew", "a thing like that", etc. Emerging part of the iceberg, the general burst of laughter on the set of Laurent Ruquier (On est en direct, January 15, 2022), during the passage of the Spanish actress Victoria Abril who came to promote the play "Drôle de genre", the story of a leading politician who discovers that his wife is transsexual : "No relation to the polemic of the moment" laughs Laurent Ruquier, joined in a burst of frank laughter by Léa Salamé and, under the cape, by Stéphane Guillon and by Philippe Besson. It is surprising that the latter, hagiographer of the Macron couple ("A Novel Character", Julliard, 2017), rewarded by an appointment to the French Consulate General in Los Angeles (appointment retracted by the Council of State), was not indignant at the mocking echo given in a flagship program of the public service, to a rumor as odious as it is violent. |
![]() |
Thus, #Brigittegate has become a polich secret that is only exchanged between trusted people, without sharing it openly in public. Comedians are having a field day ("Emmanuel Macron, his wife is Patrick Juvet", Laurent Gerra on January 3 on RTL), everywhere in France and abroad, people are laughing at the strange Madame Macron and the couple's obstinacy in denying what is now obvious to anyone who knows...
And, in all seriousness, the media news is going on as if nothing had happened. They serve us a Macron great favorite of the presidential election, super president, wowing everyone in France and abroad. "By dint of being postponed, Emmanuel Macron's declaration of candidacy resembles a mirage: we think we see it, but it evaporates when we get close" (article). Far from these lowly contingencies, he has made it his mission to prevent Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The setbacks inflicted on him by Putin do not stop him, his priority remains to safeguard peace in Europe... "Presiding "until the last quarter of the hour": Emmanuel Macron, who is multiplying consultations on Ukraine, should push the question of his candidacy as close as possible to the deadline set by the Constitutional Council on March 4, 2022, a deadline that worries several of his competitors." (article). "But the president of the Republic has no use for competing whining. [... He lets]furthermore the contenders for his office fight it out to get to the second round when he, himself, is comforted in his duties by all the polls with about 25% of the vote in the first round and around 55% of the vote in the second" (article). |
![]() |
The dailies Libération, L'Obs, Le Monde and L'Express total more than 8,000 articles mentioning Emmanuel Macron from January 2015 to January 2017; by comparison, the total number of articles mentioning Jean-Luc Mélenchon, Arnaud Montebourg and Benoît Hamon in the same dailies and over the same period of time amounts to only 7,400." [...]
Macron the romantic. Notice to the suckers and the ambitious among the high school students: sleeping with your French teacher seems to be a good way to make the headlines for several weeks. At least that's what one might think, given the number of covers and articles dedicated to the minister's love life. The celebrity press is not the only one to have focused on the sentimental life of the minister. The case of Brigitte Macron has become a hotly debated issue in the political press. The romance of the Macron couple, reminiscent of a form of courtly love to the French? This is what Le Monde and Le Figaro suggest, according to which the relationship between Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron helps explain the success of the Minister of the Economy among the female electorate. Le Figaro Madame : "Brigitte Trogneux has thus become the "great romantic" and "ideal son-in-law" guarantee of the candidate. Far from the classic image of the "political seducer" who flirts with the artistic milieu. Closer, therefore, to the French and the female electorate". Le Monde Politique: "A 16-year-old first-grader, winner of the general French competition, he fell in love with his teacher, Brigitte Trogneux, mother of three children and twenty years his senior. All of France now knows the romance that so appeals to the female electorate." Liberation: "The reversal of ages within the presidential couple in swimsuits is both a sign of egalitarian progress and a tradition maintained." |
[Speaking of the Figaro Madame" article] Nothing about the exercise of power, nothing about the foul rumor saying she was a transsexual that inflamed social networks and dumbfounded the foreign press. She still reacted on RTL, pointing to the damage in her family, before relativizing : "I took five and a half days to make these rumors disappear with a lawyer experienced in the exercise. So you imagine for others ..."
Brigitte Macron, always impeccable. First Lady haute couture, apricot complexion, golden helmet finely woven from her extensions that she speaks so naturally, as well as her false lashes that hem her azure eyes. [...] [Speaking of Mimi Marchand] "Mimi" rendered so many services - notably to prevent the paparazzi, the tabloid snoopers, from approaching her former husband, André-Louis Auzière... He had become depressed, recluse in psychiatric clinic. The communicant cleaned up his trail on the Internet, set up, with Alexandre Benalla a surveillance system at the doors of his room until his death at Christmas 2019. "Mimi" has always been loyal, respectful of the photo archives of the presidential couple, early digitized by her care, generous with their grandchildren that she covers with gifts. You don't let go of a friend like that. |
![]() ![]() |
March 5. Dalida's song "Il venait d'avoir 18 ans", with music by Pascal Auriat and Jean Bouchéty, was a big hit in 1973. Here it is reinvented by Coccyx Grue on lyrics and Marie-Line Weber on vocals, under the title "Il venait d'avoir 14 ans" (knowing that it would be more like 15 years old, cf. Appendix A 10) :
>>>song>>> 2:53 mp3. // copy and paste pdf : https://pressibus.org/gen/trogneux/14ansMarieLineWeber.mp3 // Posted online March 18: the >>>clip>>>, hang on!... Marie-Line Weber: "Life is a joke to cry with laughter and the passing years make me want to laugh more and more, to perhaps dry the tears of the past. From laughter to tears it's just a step." And don't miss his >>>song/clip>>> "We're Singing" of 4 mn 02 with lots of Saturday demonstrators (directed by Martin Loizillon, actor and coordinator of ReinfoCovid Ile de France)... |
![]() | |
He had just turned 14.
He had just turned fourteen He was as handsome as a young fawn A line that is erased It was winter of course And I counted as I ogled him My pheromones I tidied up my wig On my tits I put stucco He got scared When I looked at his face I felt my superego quivering For that minor |
He had just turned fourteen
It was the most beautiful argument To force him We didn't talk about love He knew nothing about love He was trying hard I made him see at the cinema My best film in large format Some people like it hot In the hollow of a premeditated bed I tasted, titillated This artichoke |
He had just turned fourteen
But he wasn't innocent Little scoundrel And while he was getting dressed So much wealth He told me "It didn't hurt me." This will go down in our annals One drunken night. I tidied up my wig A little bromide on my thing By imposture I was proud as I seduced him For I was three times fourteen |
Jean-Bri, a teacher like no other >>>song>>> 2:58 mp3. And, from April 4, the >>>clip>>> ! | ||
Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri
I'm crazy about iel She was a teacher like no other We like money, it's not our fault Even though I know You'll never love us Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri This is my seventh heaven Iel set my first trap He's the one who set me up in high school
It was four in the afternoon
I laughed and he cried
| (But) Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri This is my only home I'm selling France for Attali We did the great reset Yes I know we like money Jean-Bri iel's name is Jean-Bri That's my main thing She was a teacher like no other We like money, it's not our fault Even though I know You'll never love us |
Five more years >>>song>>> 4 min 11 mp3. And the >>>clip>>>. | ||
I get up
I take my pills You look straight ahead As usual On you and whatever it takes As usual And then I dress up quickly I'm cold, I straighten my back As usual |
Five more years
All day long I'll play pretend Five more years I'll smile Yes Another five years I'll "that is." Five more years Receiving roses Five more years And then old age will come With its arthritis Decrepitude! You will have played At the council of defense As usual Alone I will go to the clinic Sewing up my relics |
But five more years
Even at night I'll play pretend Five more years You will reign You'll fuck up You'll go to bed... Five more years... |
![]() This question follows a January 24, 2022 publication of a article in the people magazine Gala: "Brigitte Macron : when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room". No but how is it possible !!! what a family ! Is the crazy lady of the castle still in her full faculties ? Excess of hormones? Cocaine? ![]() Who can believe for one second that a "beau-père" Emmanuel - lover of his (supposed) mother, of the age of his daughter Laurence - could have attended the births of Brigitte's daughters, Laurence and Tiphaine having had 2 children each, as at the side of his daughter-in-law wife of Sébastien Auzière their brother who also had 2 (?) !!! From customary sources in every family we know that for simply a few decades "ONLY ONE person" can accompany a woman giving birth, a person who is most often the husband, or cohabitant, but who could be the mother in case of defection of the latter, or even another person "expressly designated by the parturient", provided that he or she would be consenting himself or herself... any midwife or obstetrician could testify to this. How could "iel" have forgotten these very basic maternity admission requirements? And / or how could the 2 sons-in-law or daughter-in-law have "agreed" to such a rape of a *** most extreme moment of marital intimacy*** with all shame... to share it with a stepfather, patch !!!!!!!!! This assertion "when my daughters had their children Emmanuel was with me in the delivery room" is one of the most far-fetched in this file ! It falls under psychiatry ! |
![]() Nothing stops Jean-Michel: he even gives details about his first delivery in a article from "Actu People" on September 13, 2020. As for Emmanuel Macron, he said in 2017 "We chose not to have children" (link). Er his mother knew "that it was not serious, not essential, that Manu not have children" (same link). In August 2022, a article in Gala headlined "Brigitte Macron's gynecologist"... |
It is extremely painful to (re)immerse oneself in Emmanuel Macron's biography, not because he sometimes lies, but because the very notion of truth is fundamentally alien to him. Indeed, his lies are not "ordinary" little arrangements with the truth, exaggerations or lies of omission. In his case, they are indeed those big lies that a child normally stops telling when he enters college. On February 1, 2017 on TF1, thus in front of all of France, Emmanuel Macron thus refers to Amiens by speaking of "his" constituency. Now everyone knows and can easily verify that he has never been elected and that he has never deigned to run in any election until then.
Until 2012, the whole of Paris believed him to be a normalist. He was presented as such in the first portraits devoted to him. After verification, it was established that this was not the case and that he had failed the competitive examination twice. We could also talk about his philosophy thesis on "the general interest" [sic], directed by Etienne Balibar. This thesis obviously does not exist and Louis Althuser's disciple told "Marianne" (October 10, 2014) "have strictly no recollection of it." In "President Burglar" (Fayard 2020), Corinne Lhaïk praises his "chutzpah," a Hebrew term for impudence. But she forgets to mention that Emmanuel Macron's lies would have socially disqualified him from the beginning without the protection of his omnipotent sponsors. |
![]() |
Emmanuel Macron told everywhere that he was cueed cold during his velo ride at Le Touquet (with "Brigitte") by François Hollande's phone call on August 26, 2014, announcing the news of his appointment as Minister of the Economy. The day before, however, he answered questions from journalists of the "Point" (published on August 28) for what will become his first interview given to the press as a minister... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
On the left: "They finally assume! The new hair order is on the march, Manu and Jean-mi explain everything in their new book..."
[tweet from March 15, 2022]
![]() March 15. The aforementioned article by Etienne Duhamel has just been censored by Médiapart in the name of freedom of expression. It was a crime of lèse-majesté, an insult to the King... Médiapart has become a guardian of the power in place. His censorship of an article by Laurent Mucchielli on the adverse effects of vaxxins had provoked indignation in 2021. Also the testimony of Enzo Lolo. There, it's laughable... | ![]() Early August 2022 (Ignace) |
![]() The yellow vests and the arsonist firefighter in December 2018., the anesthesiologist in June 2020. ![]() ![]() |
![]() Isabelle Ferreira, a committed citizen, was about, according to those close to her, to make revelations about Brigitte Macron. She even had an appointment with journalists for an interview but she did not go to the appointment. Normal, she was already dead, far from home, "near the parking lot of the Rance dam, sea side". And that's what Ouest France [on March 11] says. Yes, because she still had the right to an article in a major French newspaper, which is not in the habit of devoting articles to every death by drowning or to every suicide. But let's move on. The article does specify "that it was a drowning". But takes care to add. "It could be an accident or suicide but there is no evidence of third party intervention. An autopsy has been performed. The complete results are not yet available, but the first elements confirm that the drowning was recent. The woman had arrived the day before in Saint-Malo where she had rented a hotel room." And to make the narrative perfect, the journalist adds that she was in a precarious situation (while she had just supposedly paid for a hotel room and transportation), that an "investigation has been entrusted to the police to trace the background of this woman, who lived in the Paris region, and the circumstances of her arrival in Saint-Malo. Her situation seemed to be precarious. She was taken care of by the Samu social in Paris". According to those close to her, she was going to make revelations with the help of a journalist about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair. It is probably a simple coincidence, a chance. But if thousands of citizens are questioning and investigating at this very moment, it is probably not for nothing. Moreover, Amandine Roy who is being sued by Brigitte Macron for having interviewed Natacha Rey who explained that she thought that Brigitte was actually a transsexual, also paid tribute to Isabelle Ferreira. The most surprising, is one of the sms sent by Isabelle at the beginning of the year [January 19], now public. One of her friends also tells what just happened. We leave it to you to judge for yourself.
Even stranger is the testimony of the person who was contacted by the police to announce his death. He publishes :
The big question that hundreds of Internet users are asking tonight is "what was Isabelle Ferreira doing in Saint Malo ?" And many are worried to see the hashtag #IsabelleFereira disappear from Twitter. Worse it is already no longer suggested in automatic typing, which indicates that there is indeed a problem somewhere. But where? That's the question. |
As you may know, I have received 2 summonses for 2 proceedings, one of which will take place on April 5 at the Court of Lisieux (1st hearing only and we will ask for cancellation or postponement for various formal defects and anomalies) which will oppose me to the diabolical Auzière couple, protected by the Elysée. [...]
These big rich people close to the power and to the Trogneux-Auzière children dare to claim from me, through their lawyer, astronomical damages, for having emitted a hypothesis, spoken in the conditional tense (it is necessary to try to find a rational explanation to the Brigitte -Jean-Michel/André Louis Auzière mystery, with the clues we have, since we have been lied to about everything since the beginning) and stating some implacable truths like the fact that the wedding photo of the so-called "Brigitte Trogneux" is a photo trick, a cruder montage, a BIG fake that leaves no doubt. [...] But bad faith and arrogance will be well and truly on display in this trial of the pot of earth against the pot of iron! If they could put me in jail, believe me they would, as long as I would bother them! I've already been held in custody 2 times TOTALLY illegally according to my lawyer, who will ask for compensation. They want war, they will have it, because I will not calm down, given that I am in my right, did not commit any crime, no offence ! These corrupters and manipulators do not scare me, will not stop me, and I still have many surprises in store for them. [...] |
The first two columns are for the entire Pressibus site. To stick to just this page (as of January 22), we can remove 4,000 per month for "Different Visitors" and 7,000 per month for "Visits", which is factored into the "Rounded Total". The following columns show the number of downloads of the full French file (possibly downloaded elsewhere), the number of listens to the voice comparison (red box 1) and the Ode to Macron Mephisto (Appendix C 2), a moving video that shows how criminal Macron (under the influence of his mentors Brigitte, McKinsey, Big Pharma & Co.) was in the Covid crisis. |
![]() |
Five years ago, the media invented an exceptional character, a Mozart of finance, an accomplished philosopher, an extraordinary intelligence, a
enarque but also an actor, a fine politician, dynamic, young, rich and formidable.
This character did not exist. Behind this fiction, there was only Emmanuel, a Frenchman born under Giscard, raised in the provincial bourgeoisie, with all that it entails in terms of precautions, prejudices, and fears, and whose only exceptional fact was the hijacking of a minor. A crime transformed by the magic of media enslavement and systemic collusion, into a passionate and touching romance; the meeting with a future first lady prepared all her life for this role, having found the dream partner. The myth, when tested by reality, became a tragedy for the majority. The stage was transformed into an arena, and the play into a circus game. Emmanuel, who became Macron, was in reality a man without quality. President, after an unprecedented media bludgeoning, he retains power only through violence and the unfailing support of the oligarchy that made him king. |
From Olivier Probst's report on this meeting (link) :
I add the lesson of "compromise" and "transparency" docently professed by the cynical president, reappointed to the presidential and then spurned in the legislative elections, in his televised speech on June 22, 2022. | ![]() [photo Ludovic Marin, AFP, March 7, 2022] |
![]() | When on a trip, you were questioned face to face with one of the 15,000 victims of your pseudo health policy, namely a non-vaccinated caregiver in tears, in total distress, imploring your clemency to have the right to work, because having for months no means of subsistence, not even the RSA, what did you do? As the cold monster that you are, You then had the indecency to give him an abject lesson in morality with two bullets of which you have the secret, speaking to him of lack of "courtesy" and "kindness", while assailing him these perfectly inappropriate remonstrances with a nonchalance and an ignoble disdain for his precarious condition of which you are however the only craftsman and person in charge, before proceeding the next moment as if nothing had happened to a few smiling selfies ! Unbearable... [Olivier Probst, link, article from March 15] |
The bloody repression of the Yellow Vests movement and the scam of the "Grand débat" should have alerted all editorial offices to the reality of Macronian power. Instead of an awakening of consciences, the project has been reinforced, through two tools specific to dictatorships : censorship and propaganda. This new campaign uses the same codes as the previous one. But Macron has never governed. He has managed the country like a consultant, with the help of quarterly objectives, unable to see and understand what is foreign to him, having never stopped humiliating the French. A few days before the presidential election, the factory of consent is not far from overheating. Yet, a second round without Macron is possible. It is enough to unplug the TVs. |
The phenomenon is historically old, the "moderate" are not and they have always distrusted the people who vote badly, they were very few in the ranks of the Resistance in 39/45 ... They supported Pétain as in Germany the Zentrum of Von Papen opened the doors of power to Hitler. [...]
![]() This is David Adler's other important result: he shows that not only are centrists less sensitive to democratic values, but they are also more in demand of strong power. Thus, centrists are not only distant from democracy; they also have authoritarian tendencies. This attraction to authoritarianism can be explained by a form of incomprehension with regard to elections: it is the feeling that the people do not follow, and that they must be brought back into line. It is clear that for some years now, the results of the ballot boxes have been considered disappointing by some of the elites. The people vote badly. The success of populist parties regularly reinforces this mistrust. Voters are accused of not being faithful to democratic values. However, if we follow Adler's analysis, it is precisely the opposite: it is in the name of democracy that voters turn away from governing parties. In short, it is always the voters' fault, never the elites'. However, in a company, if a product doesn't sell, we don't have fun saying that it's because the customer isn't up to it. Voters who vote poorly are equated with potential fascists, when many of them are, on the contrary, aspiring to make democratic principles prevail. The other, more important risk is to discredit democracy. The situation is quite comical: it is the protest parties that claim to be democratic (just look at the FN or France insoumise, which are constantly calling for referendums) while the government parties hesitate to use the word, preferring to denounce populism and demagoguery. |
Wikipedia has a page provided on the far center. Napoleon Bonaparte, Elie Décazes, prime minister of Louis XVIII, a supporter of the Juste Milieu are cited. "The moderates of the extreme center state speak of union, of compromise in defense of the national interest. Far from being partisan, they say they defend the general interest, working for the stability of society and the state. It is a question of repressing the sometimes unleashed passions. Self-control is considered a characteristic of the upper classes. The opposition between reason and fanaticism thus justifies that the upper classes must exclusively control political power." The dates of 1793, 1799, 1814, 1815, 1851, 1886, 1940, 1958, 2017 are considered to be power of the extreme center in France. Macron's "And at the same time" (links : 1 2) would be a resurgence of "girouettism." |
![]() | In this February 2022 book, Jean-Baptiste Gallen compares Macron and Decazes, described as the inventor of the "En même temps." They claimed to go beyond the old cleavages and found themselves confronted with the rise of the extremes, aroused by their leads. Subtitle : "The fall of an ambitious (1818-1820)". Link, article. |
![]() ![]() To the left AFP photo. Right resume of a tweet drawing accompanied by this text:"When we know how adept Macron is with symbols and that he plays it "Hamelin player" version state for his induction, any parent should start to tremble. For in the Grimm fairy tale the children were taken away, and alive, the parents never saw them again ... never ". |
On Sunday, April 24, Emmanuel Macron was re-elected with 58.7% of the vote. He will therefore once again be the president of France, "failing to be the president of the French", and this for the next five years. For his inaugural speech, he arrived hand in hand with his wife, surrounded by several children of his campaign team members.
This staging, if it pleased some, has indignant many others. Notably because Emmanuel Macron excludes neither the return of the vaccine pass, nor even mandatory vaccination for his next five years, and could therefore force more young people to be pricked. A stance that has been at the origin of successive liberticidal measures, themselves having led to a considerable increase in the suicide rate among children during the last two years. Note also that some of his collaborators (and friends) have been accused of incest, or even pedophilia, such as Olivier Duhamel or Claude Lévêque. As a result, this proximity displayed by Emmanuel Macron surrounded by young people, if it looks good on camera, sounds rather false on paper. Moreover, some Internet users could not help but to note the rather sheepish pout of Brigitte Macron. |
![]() 2019 BFM TV TV movie (Appendix D 10). The "vice president" has her portrait in a room in her palace. |
She sends fifteen emails to the teacher, sometimes three pages long, during school vacations, or late at night, castigating her teaching methods and attitude. She doesn't understand her daughter's poor grades in literature. [...]
"Yesterday evening : seven emails from you, one of which versed in insult, and this until one o'clock in the morning...", writes the teacher, copying the head of school and her assistant. He asks the mother to address, henceforth, to them directly. Among some teachers of the Rembrandt-Bugatti college in Molsheim, the method of Brigitte Macron's office does not pass. "The reaction of the rectorate is disproportionate, insists a colleague of Didier Jodin, who follows the case closely. It is not the role of a First Lady. If she absolutely wanted to react, she could have transmitted this message to the ministry. There, at least, a hierarchical scheme would have been followed. Mrs. Macron is neither elected nor a minister !" |
After a long reflection, the Courier has decided to talk about the Jean-Michel Trogneux affair, which occupies many minds and conversations in the most perfect silence of the subsidized media. We have chosen to talk about it because of this discrepancy between the conversations in town and the silence of the press, which is subsidized by the regime and cartelized by the billionaires who elected Emmanuel Macron. It seems to us that there is an indication of a disconnection that sums up the French democratic malaise in itself.
Until now, we have never mentioned the excellent, breathtaking investigation by Xavier Poussard and his Faits & Documents, on the Macron legend, which he demonstrates with talent and rigor the complete forgery. From my point of view, the main revelation of this long and meticulous investigation is the systematic measurement of the distance between the official "narrative" and the facts such as indisputable proofs allow to trace them. But, until now, the Courier has always considered that the private lives of elected officials were not a political issue. After all, if Brigitte Macron is suspected of having had a sex change, and if there is convincing, plausible evidence to support that suspicion, what does it matter in politics? Everyone does what they want in their private lives, and it is nobody's business. A matter in every conversation in town. I recently hosted a dinner party at home and, to my surprise, the six guests I had invited that evening (and who did not know each other) spontaneously talked about the details revealed by Xavier Poussard about Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron's private life. And I brutally measured the political impact that this affair had on ordinary public opinion in France. On the substance, no guest was embarrassed by the suspicions of homosexuality or transsexuality that are now supported by circumstantial elements published for several weeks and never attacked by the presidential couple. On the other hand, all are convinced that the Macronian power is based on a logic of permanent lies. There is the staging for the little people, relayed by newspapers under orders, and there is the truth, totally different from this narrative. We could not find better evidence on the rupture between the people and the caste, which holds our system. |
Closing this 2022 file.
This file, opened on January 24, 2022, with 22 chapters, closes on November 29, 2022, with 37 chapters and 4 voluminous appendices. I benefited from complete freedom for its drafting and precious help from correspondents, whom I thank warmly. All came with a constructive spirit. I personally did not investigate much, they are the ones who made the file progress. I ordered the information and made it consistent. This is a genealogical investigation like any other, except that rather than going to libraries and the web for written sources, I was given them.
So our understanding of the facts has evolved. Especially in three respects. At the beginning, we believed that Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953 had not existed, then we understood that Jean-Michel had indeed had a little sister, both being on the photo of end 1954. She would have died around 1961, without this being declared, which made it possible to usurp her identity. Second point, Catherine Audoy, wife of Jean-Louis Auzière, Jean-Michel's friend and accomplice, is not the mother of the three Auzière children. The father would be Jean-Michel, as we thought, but the mother would be Brigitte Auzière, a niece of Jean-Louis. Third point: the photo of the Trogneux family in the middle of the 50's and the photo of the wedding of 1974 are not faked a posteriori, but only retouched, from the period. The evolution of our investigation was also marked by confirmations. We guessed that Brigitte was born male, we had a proof of it by the equivalence of her vocal spectrum with that of a transsexual (here). We guessed that Brigitte Macron did not get married in 1974, we had confirmation by the differentiation of the two handwritings (here). We guessed the existence of Brigitte Auzière, before we had proof, as a witness at the 1980 wedding (there). In January, we thought that with such an affair, Emmanuel Macron could not run again. With insane support from the blind, deaf and dumb media, the worst of them even supporting the lies, he managed to get re-elected with diminished powers. Defending herself only to postpone the deadline, Brigitte Macron has remained untouchable, despite her identity theft and her abduction of a minor. Transparency and truth are obscured to the point of no longer existing for the majority of the population. The totalitarianism of democratic appearance in which we live is only held by the chloroformed media. The truth should eventually come out, all at once or gradually, as with the Covid crisis. I cannot forget that Covid 2021-2022 crisis, the apartheid, the huge lies. It is also what brought me to this issue. Despite their obvious failures, they are still there, the ones who caused many unnecessary deaths by refusing early treatment (see Macron's involvement when he refused it to obey the "system", Appendix C 20) and forcing everyone to vaxxination. When will the victims be recognized ? Victims not of Covid, but of human mistakes that should not be repeated. Since the end of August, this file has not progressed much, as if we had reached the end of our research. At our level perhaps, but there is so much to reveal. Perhaps on the US side with the documents seized from Trump's safe? A new issue of "Facts & Documents" should be devoted to the case. I wanted to wait for it but Xavier Poussard seems to have difficulty in moving forward. Natacha Rey seems to have remained at the level of December 2021. So the time has come to close this file, at least for 2022. I'm not ruling out a few post-script additions, or a true reopening, but the gist of it seems to me to be already revealed. Alain Beyrand, November 29, 2022 |
![]() "Selling a couple rather than a program": that's effectively what happened in 2017 (Appendix A 23) |
![]()
|
Correction #1 on the 1960-1974 period (and also before...)
On several occasions in this file, notably in Appendix A 31, we have emphasized the importance of Louis Auzière, Jean-Louis's older brother and Brigitte's father, France's "special agent." In Appendix A 28, we asked the question, "Did Jean Trogneux[Jean-Michel and Brigitte's father]know Louis Auzière ?". Although we have not found any factual clues that would allow us to say so, we believe that yes, they did know each other well. Jean was born in 1909, Louis was born in 1917. They certainly did not do their military service together, but they may have known each other during the turmoil of the Second World War. They could also have had a common friend or had another opportunity to meet. The year 1960 arrives. Brigitte, born Trogneux, died in circumstances that are unknown to us and her parents did not accept it, going so far as not to declare her death. It is there that Jean Trogneux calls his friend the secret agent Louis Auzière so that he finds a solution. We do not know the terms of this agreement, but we know the consequences: Brigitte, Louis' daughter, becomes in Amiens Brigitte Trogneux, Jean's late daughter (perhaps on the occasion of a change of school, possibly after one or more years of absence) and Jean-Michel, Jean's son, finds himself in Algiers (at least in 1963, cf. Appendix A 22) in a very troubled time, probably to occupy himself with intelligence tasks assigned to him by Louis Auzière. |
The attached Betaface comparison between the 1974 bride and Laurence Auzière in 1991/1992 3rd grade (Appendix A 10) shows a strong resemblance, at 83%, and seems to support that Laurence would be the daughter of Brigitte born Auzière. |
![]() |
July 5, 2023. A new Pressibus dossier: Behind the legend of Joan of Arc. The Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard of the time knew it, and social networks spread the word: La Pucelle wasn't born in Domrémy, and she didn't die at the stake in Rouen in 1431. The Macron of the time, Charles VII, had imposed the official legend on the servile media. But the facts remained stubbornly hidden. Today, the legend is beginning to regress, and Joan is no longer a shepherdess who tended sheep, with God in her direct line. Who can believe that, with a magic wand, a 17-year-old country girl could speak the language of the Court and transform herself into a brilliant war leader? The reality was quite different. Just as to understand the Brigitte Macron mystery, you have to guess that she was born as Jean-Michel Trogneux, so for La Pucelle, you have to guess that she was the king's sister or half-sister. So yes, everything becomes clearer... And we realize that, if she is no longer an exalted woman guided by her hallucinations, Joan of Arc becomes an ordinary woman with an extraordinary temperament!
Other features: Behind the legend of Victorina (ruler of the Gauls) (a legend denied by historians, but which was true), Behind the legend of Martin de Tours, Behind the legend of Heloise (and Abelard) (both legends to be qualified), and of course, Behind the legend of Covid-19 (in french), as bogus as that of Brigitte Macron.... With a new Home page. |
![]() |
What is considered a "rumor" has not wavered since December 2021. Aisni en, in 2023, the Headlines on the left from late January, on the right from early Sept. and the headline below from mid-September.
![]() |
![]() |
On November 29, 2022, the Pressibus 2022 dossier on Brigitte Macron came to an end. Exactly one year later, twenty Post-Scriptum 2023 have been added. It's time for a quick review. Our dossier, mixing certainties and hypotheses, retains its relevance. Only Postscript No. 3 of February 25 was a corrective, while the other 19 confirmed our positions, as did the other, unlisted, information we gathered. To the best of our knowledge, we are the only ones to make available to the public a comprehensive scenario of what really happened, particularly with regard to the birth of the three Auzière children. It is based on the successive existence of three Brigitte Trogneux :
This scenario has several advantages:
The spiral of lies is as follows:
Other scenarios, more or less sketched out, remain possible, but, to date, they don't have these advantages. All agree that Brigitte Macron was born Jean-Michel Trogneux; the main discrepancy concerns the mother (or mothers) of the three children. Hypotheses have also been put forward about Emmanuel Macron, notably about the identity of his father. There, the opacity is hardly pierced, no more in 2023 than in 2022; we have vaguely opened a few tracks, without going further. |
From here on, the postscripts differ from those in the French version, gathered in this page, separate from the 2022 dossier, to be consulted for further information. Only a summary of the most important points is presented below. |
![]() She [Tiphaine] doesn't go on X (formerly Twitter), because the hatred surges there without safeguards: "How to resist the disinformation of social networks ? By being well surrounded. My children have already heard horrors at school, but they talk to me about it. I don't minimize what they say because, on a child's scale, things take on a different dimension. I don't feel pain, but anger at the misinformation. I'm worried about the level of society when I hear what's circulating on social networks about my mother being a man. The aplomb of what is asserted and the credit given to what is proclaimed. Anyone can say anything about anyone, and it takes time to take it back. My family and I are armed, united and solid, but the granddaughter in Pas-de-Calais who committed suicide? We need to work on moderation, online anonymity, the excessively long timescales for deleting content."In difficult times, her mainsprings and resources are the joie de vivre of her children (aged 8 and 10) and contact with nature. |
This episode is blowing up so I just want to say—After looking into this, I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man. Any journalist or publication that is trying to dismiss this plausibility is immediately identifiable as establishment. I have never seen anything like this in my life. The implications here are terrifying. I do not intend to let up on this story and I am calling on other journalists to look into this explosive story and report accordingly. [tweet] |
The proof we have
At this stage, when no major media outlet is mentioning it, it's worth pointing out that we have several pieces of evidence in this case, both scientific and administrative, none of which have been contested to date:
|
according to Jean-Louis Auzière: 1941 | according to family genealogy: 1951 | according to administration: 1950/1954 |
Jean-Louis explains that he knew André well. "He was born and raised in Africa, but he came back to France regularly. We spent part of our childhood together, in Cannes, in the family home. He's a nephew, but because of the generation gap, since my mother had me very late, I'm the same generation as him. We were born a year apart, I in 1942, he in 1941. And by chance of the calendar, we were both born on the same date, February 28" |
![]() |
![]() |
Source: book "L'affaire Madame", Emmanuelle Anizon, 2024. | Source: geneanet, base kensi13 of Nicolas Terry, grand-nephew of Jean-Louis. | Source: Dictionnaire biographique des anciens élèves de l'Ecole Nationale de la France d'Outre-mer (2003) |
Scenario: | Official thesis | Natacha Rey 2021 | Pressibus 2022 | F&D n°527 2023 |
Brigitte Macron's birth name | Brigitte Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux |
Biological father of three Auzière children | André Louis Auzière | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | André Louis Auzière |
Biological mother of three children | Brigitte (née) Trogneux | Catherine Audoy (2nd wife of Jean-Louis Auzière) | Brigitte "Proba" (née) Auzière | Brigitte (née) Trogneux |
Brigitte (née) Trogneux is fictitious | no | yes | no | no |
André Louis Auzière is fictitious | no | yes | yes | no |
Brigitte "Proba" (née) Auzière exists | no | no | yes | no |
Jean-Michel Trogneux is the uncle of the three children | yes | no | no | yes |
Plausible/Probable | no/non | no/non | yes/yes | yes/no |
Why? | Brigitte Macron, born a man, is not the bride of 1974 | Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953 existed, Catherine Audoy is not the mother of the three children | The presence of Brigitte "Proba" Auzière is confirmed as a witness to the 1980 wedding (Chap. 30 part. 2). | It appears likely that André Louis Auzière, as father of the three children, is a fictional character |
Note | This is the current mainstream media version, ignoring new elements | In early 2022, the Natacha Rey 2021 scenario was also the F&D and Pressibus one |
Complement: the tree of the Trogneux-Ledoux cousinage. Showing its unfamiliarity with the subject, "Le Figaro" got confused about Laurence Auzière's photo, first attributed to Brigitte Macron (differences : 1 2). Natacha Rey (right) posted a tweet explaining her state of mind in the face of illness and the advancement of her trial to June 19. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Brigitte Macron associated with Amanda Lear (featured in Chapter 12) in Gala on October 7, 2021, then associated with "androgynous style" on February 3, 2023. With the two medallists at L'Elysée on October 10, 2023. Right, "Le Point" on May 19, 2019. |
![]() ![]() ![]() The article on the "Contre Attaque" website, on the "Le Monde" revelation, concludes : "Tarpets of bombs, wars and grenades: we have forcible bourgeois in power, who took pleasure in torturing us, and who now want to hand France over to fascism or civil war. It's time to dislodge them". At center, the beginning of the France-Soir article. On the right is a photo (Hannah McKay / AFP) of a article from "Sud-Ouest", which illustrates the media's double game on Brigittegate : on the front, they defend Emmanuel Macron tooth and nail ("infox virale sur Brigitte Macron"), on the back, they show a very masculine photo of Jean-Bri-Bri... ![]() The destitution.fr website. The conditions for impeachment: high treason voted by two-thirds of parliamentarians. Another solution: the empêchement, for example for mental illness... |
I promised one of my neighbors, whose name is Laurence Auzière, cardiologist, Brigitte Macron's daughter, to say a word. I think what is being done to our First Lady is simply shameful... And intolerable. This has got to stop. First of all, you have to understand that if you no longer respect the executive, you open the door to anything. Madame Macron is a mother. And I find that absolutely scandalous. In fact, I've suggested to her lawyer, Maître Enocchi, that we file a joint complaint to denounce this use of a serious and disabling pathology as a subject for humiliation, mockery and derision. So it's the fashionable insult now any woman in the street who's going to look... Because let's not kid ourselves, there are women who are a little masculine, there are biological women... Ah! Transgender! What's that? So, in relation to Brigitte Macron, I say it's scandalous! And that it has no place. And I hope that Justice will make, I would say, a gesture that is exceptional, and a gesture that clearly explains to people that it has no place ! |
![]() ![]() Alexandra knows Emmanuel's mother and a daughter of "Brigitte" well. |
Scenario : | Official thesis | Natacha Rey 2021 | Pressibus 2022 | F&D n°527 2023 | CNdG 2024 |
Brigitte Macron's birth name | Brigitte Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux |
Biological father of the three Auzière children | André Louis Auzière | Jean-Michel Trogneux | Jean-Michel Trogneux | André Louis Auzière | Jean-Michel Trogneux |
Biological mother of three children | Brigitte (née) Trogneux | Catherine Audoy (2nd wife of Jean-Louis Auzière) | Brigitte "Proba" (née) Auzière | Brigitte (née) Trogneux | Brigitte (née) Trogneux |
Brigitte (née) Trogneux is fictitious | no | yes | no | no | no |
André Louis Auzière is fictional | no | yes | yes | no | yes |
Brigitte "Proba" (née) Auzière exists | no | no | yes | no | no |
Jean-Michel Trogneux is the uncle of the three children | yes | no | no | yes | no |
Jean-Michel Trogneux is Emmanuel Macron's father | no | no | no | no | yes |
Plausible/Probable | no/non | no/non | yes/yes | yes/no | yes/no |
Why? | Brigitte Macron, born male, is not the 1974 bride. | Brigitte Trogneux born in 1953 existed, Catherine Audoy is not the mother of the three children | The presence of Brigitte "Proba" Auzière is confirmed as a witness to the 1980 wedding (Chap. 30 part. 2). | It appears likely that André Louis Auzière, as father of the three children, is a fictitious character. | The Trogneux family would not have accepted brother-sister incest. |
Note | This is the current mainstream media version, ignoring new elements | In early 2022, the Natacha Rey 2021 scenario was also that of F&D and Pressibus | In the NBI 2022 dossier, Jean-Michel was already Emmanuel's father (Appendix A 37). |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() | A first step towards impeachment.
Against all expectations, the bureau of the National Assembly has, by 12 votes to 10, deemed admissible the motion for a resolution tabled by the Insoumis MPs and a number of ecologist and communist elected representatives, aimed at initiating impeachment proceedings against the President of the Republic (article). This is a first in the Fifth Republic. If Brigittegate were to break out in the near future, the prognosis could change sides. All it would take is for a few political figures or a few major media outlets to summon up their courage... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() means he (il) and she (elle). |
Before October 20, 2021 | There are very few publications indicating that Brigitte Macron could have been a man. One page from a Spanish blog has been spotted, dated May 10, 2017. Its author, Eladio Fernandez, goes so far as to wonder whether Brigitte Macron could be Emmanuel's father. In 2017, too, but without her then publishing, a French profiler of international stature, Nadine Touzeau, understands that Brigitte is a man (P.-S. 35). Following a series of videos dating from 2017, in which he claims to have fucked Emmanuel Macron, photographer Alexis du Réau publishes a new video in December 2018, disguised in a blonde wig, in which he declares "You know Brigitte is a trans ?" (Chapter 18). The audience is tiny. |
October 20, 2021 | On October 20, issue 501 of "Faits & Documents", dated September 1 to 30, 2021, is received by subscribers to this "confidential newsletter" run by Xavier Poussard. It continues the investigations into Brigitte Macron begun in issue 497 (April/May 2021). It reports on the information gathered by an independent investigator, Natacha Rey. Her very strange and abrupt arrest on July 11, 2021 is intriguing, even though its cause seems innocuous: contact with the wife of Jean-Louis Auzière, uncle of Brigitte Macron's first husband, André Louis Auzière. Natacha Rey is convinced that Brigitte Macron was born a man under the name of her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux. Xavier Poussard considers this hypothesis plausible, even probable, and publicly questions its validity. This is the first time it has been precisely explained in a written document. We're no longer making allegations without any factual basis. The main revelation is the shift, in the mid-1980s, from Jean-Michel's full life and Brigitte's emptiness to Brigitte's full life and Jean-Michel's emptiness. It was the beginning of "Brigittegate". Illustrations from this 501 issue would later be shown on television in China, Portugal and all over the world... (Appendix D 13) |
End of October to November 2021 | Only Lionel Labosse, on October 22, takes up the information on the page of the Covid newspaper's "Altersexualité" site, believing it to be a state lie. That same day, he publishes a page entitled "Brigitte Macron : "Et si c'était un homme?"", supertitled "Scandale d'État en macronie : le Brigittegate". The page was reposted on the "Profession Gendarme" website on October 29, with over 200,000 views. The news slowly began to spread. |
December 2021 | Natacha Rey has found someone to give her investigation a boost. It's Amandine Roy, a medium, who also feels the question needs to be asked. On December 5, Natacha announced on a page on the Qactus website, the publication of a Youtube video on Amandine's channel. Released on December 10, the 4h 35 min long video will count some 500,000 views. The response on social networks was enormous. Reaction from the mainstream media was swift and swift. Apart from a few who remain silent, such as Le Canard Enchaîné and Médiapart, all are outraged by what they call a "transphobic rumor", nauseating, extreme right-wing, etc. Youtube tries to make the video invisible, before censoring it... The strangeness of this near-unanimous response questions curious observers, especially those who have denounced the Covid lies. By searching the Internet, they can easily find the entire issue of F&D no. 501, and understand why the major media elude all factual elements... This written basis facilitates the spread of information. On December 14, in response to "Closer", the "Résistance & Réinformation" site devotes an initial article to the "Jean-Michel Trogneux affair" (summary of subsequent ones). On the same day, Colonel de Guerlasse opened his journal "Brigittegate". On December 16, on a page of his site "Le Courrier des Stratèges", Eric Verhaeghe writes about it, wondering whether this, along with his other pots and pans, will enable Macron to stand again in the April 2022 presidential elections. On December 18, the Pressibus website's Covid newspaper makes mention of the affair and devotes a small dossier to it on December 26. On December 20, a 55-page dossier in English and 10 in French, "Brigitte Macron is not a woman", is published on the Internet by Marie de Plume. Lionel Labosse, deals with the subject again, and then also, on a regular basis (summary), often relayed by the "Profession Gendarme" website. On December 24, he launches a appeal for a parliamentary commission of inquiry. F&D issues 497 to 501 are purchased by the most fervent Internet users. Brigittology" is born, promoted by "brigittologists"... Investigation becomes a civic activity. |
January 2022 | On January 4, while we're still in the midst of Covid apartheid, Emmanuel Macron accentuates discrimination against the unvaccinated, declaring that he's "envi[e]d to piss off to the end" those who resist his will. On January 8, in a new video, Natacha Rey shows a photo suggesting a link between Jean-Michel Trogneux and the murdered Pastor Doucé, a sulphurous figure from the 1970s (Chapter 14). She announces future revelations, which never come. On January 12, a tweet published by an anonymous voice comparison specialist, claims that the transsexual Véronique interviewed on TV in 1977 is the same person as Brigitte Macron. Silhouette, gestures and a speech tic support the vocal comparison (box in Chapter 14). This proof that Brigitte Macron was born a man has never been scientifically contested. With echoes of Brigittegate still running high, Brigitte Macron felt compelled to intervene. On January 12 and 14, on TV channel TF1 and radio station RTL, she castigated those who mistook her for her brother, but presented no factual evidence (Chapter 14). Suspicions are therefore confirmed. January 24 sees the publication of the first version of the dossier Pressibus, entitled "De Jean-Michel à Brigitte Trogneux, mensonges à l'Elysée", comprising its first 22 chapters, with a pdf version and, shortly afterwards, an english version and its pdf. It presents itself as a genealogical and biographical investigation, accumulating information to forge intimate convictions, even certainties. The clues already presented are numerous, a few of them proving invalid, notably the man in the top hat (Chapter 14) and the Gallice jewelry store in Toulon (Appendix A 20). The physical aspects, often highlighted by Natacha Rey, are not ignored. It is shown that "Brigitte", for her age (7 and a half years older than advertised), benefits from a good facelift, like Amanda Lear (chapters 12 and 13). Just as Natacha has surmised, Brigitte Macron is considered here, not as the mother she is from an administrative point of view, but as the biological father of the three Auzière children (Chapter 11). F&D publishes issue 504, which, among other things, dismantles the bogus Moadab/Blanrue investigation and the legend of the "little fatty" referred to by some as Jean-Michel Trogneux (Appendix A 7). On January 29, Lionel Labosse publishes the page "#Brigittegate : documents for analysis and comparison", also with some abandoned leads. The citizens' inquiry is in full swing, and the mainstream media are becoming mute. |
February 2022 | At the beginning of the month, Putin humiliates Macron by presenting him with an oversized table and a translator in a skirt (Appendix D 6). Emmanuel Macron's childhood and youth are explored (Chapters 23, 24). Before the age of 12, the lack of photos and information is intriguing. The investigation then stalls in this area. An "NBI dossier" is published, providing fresh insight and investigating the possibility that Emmanuel's father was Jean-Michel aka Brigitte (Appendix A 37). Here too, no significant progress was made. On February 16, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy learn that they are being sued by the three Auzière children, their "mother" Brigitte and her invisible double Jean-Michel Trogneux for "invasion of privacy". This will be Trial No. 2 (another will be tried first). The mainstream media go back to "l'odieuse rumeur", which should thus disappear... A study of school documents shows that Emmanuel and Brigitte first met in September 1992. They were then 14 and 47 (39 as Brigitte) (Appendix A 10). Lionel Labosse dons a headgear and launches the "yellow wig" movement, with multiple demonstrations and a series of videos humorously exploring the Brigittological situation (Appendix D 4). He also rewrites some famous song lyrics, performed by Marie-Line Weber (Appendix D 11). Emmanuel Macron has repeatedly put off announcing his candidacy for the French presidency. Is he hesitating? Could it be because of Brigittegate, which continues to gain momentum, especially outside France? |
March 2022 | Barack Obama was re-elected even though his wife Michelle was suspected of being a man (Appendix A 23). This precedent may explain the candidacy of the man whose "Whatever it costs" and "At the same time" record has divided the French in a way not seen since May 1968. The announcement was made on March 3. Echoes of the "Brigitte" scandal continue to spread abroad (Appendix D 13). Parisian brigittologist Isabelle Ferreira is mysteriously found drowned in Saint-Malo, 320 km from her home. After a swift investigation, the case is closed (Appendix D 17). We learn that Jean-Louis Auzière and his wife Catherine have filed a libel suit against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, mainly for saying that Catherine is the mother of the three Auzière children, a side issue in Brigittegate (Appendix D 18). This is trial no. 1. On March 29, geopolitical writer Morad El Hattab tells Amandine Roy that Jean-Michel Trogneux was a student in Algiers in 1963. A new part of the investigation opens with photo comparisons and a question about the meeting in Algiers of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Jean-Louis Auzière (Chapter 25). |
April 2022 | The far center (Appendix D 22) wins, stirring up fears of the far right and far left, Macron is re-elected on April 24. Brigitte / Jean-Michel looks distressed (Appendix D 24). Iel will then be more discreet than before. A study of the 1963 Algerian adventure reveals a third thief: Jean-Marc Uhrweiller. Much later, in 1986, he helped Jean-Michel / Brigitte settle in the commune of Truchtersheim (Chapter 25), enabling the woman known as Madame Auzière to teach French at a private lycée in Strasbourg. This was before she returned to her native Amiens in 1991, where she met Emmanuel a year later. A study of the Auzière family reveals a strong link with the French secret service, which explains, among other things, the falsification of the 1974 marriage (Appendices A 30 and A 31). Jean-Michel Trogneux's life becomes clearer before his near-disappearance, around 1985: he was present in Blangy-Tronville, in the Somme region, where he managed the Picardie Métal company from 1973 to 1984 (Appendix A 33). Although the media echo faded for a while with the elections and the summer coming up, the case continued to be reinforced. |
May 2022 | The month of May allows the Pressibus dossier to answer, in a way that is not yet certain, but considered very likely, two important questions: 1) was a Brigitte Trogneux really born in 1953 ? And if so, what became of her? The answer is yes Jean-Michel's little sister was born in Amiens on April 13, 1953. This Brigitte n°1 would have died in 1960 at the age of 8, without her death being declared (Chapter 28). 2) Who is the mother of the three Auzière children ? The answer was given in two stages. Firstly, she was an Auzière and, in the absence of her first name, "Proba" (as in "Probable") was attributed to her. Secondly, it is believed that she is a real-life female double of the ghost André Louis Auzière, Brigitte's fictional first husband, and that her first name is Brigitte (Chapter 27). Proof of the existence of this Brigitte n°2, "Proba" Auzière, is her presence in 1980 at the wedding of... Jean-Michel Trogneux with Véronique Dreux (they had two children). The three Auzière children would have as administrative parents the 1974 bride and groom, Brigitte n°1, now deceased, and the ghostly André Louis Auzière, and as biological parents Jean-Michel Trogneux (who would thus have had five children) and Brigitte n°2 Auzière, who would disappear in 1985 to make way for a Brigitte n°3, later married to Macron. Other hypotheses exist (P.-S. 64), but as the months go by and new clues are discovered, the Pressibus hypothesis of this late May 2022 will grow stronger, serving as a grid for understanding the eventful life of Jean-Michel Trogneux, from February 11, 1945 to the present day. |
June to August 2022 | In June, in the legislative elections, Emmanuel Macron loses his absolute majority in the National Assembly. Voters become more discerning, but most are still unaware of Brigittegate, still concealed by media propaganda. Brigittologists continue their research on Twitter and on the fil Telegram "L'affaire Jean-Michel Trogneux". The Pressibus file presents some of the information found : the Macron couple's annual meeting with the Auzière couple (Appendix A 42), Jean-Michel Trogneux's home in La Nouville sur Oudeuil in 1983 (Appendix A 47). The family photo from late 1953 and the wedding photo from 1974 have probably been faked, but through period manipulation by the photographer, to improve or complete, with no intention to deceive (Appendix A 48). On a few other points too, past suspicions become irrelevant. Moving on. |
September 2022 to December 2022 | The Pressibus dossier is reorganized, slightly rewritten and completed, notably with the addition of a concluding summary (Chapter 31), tables of links and biographies (Chapter 32) and a table of hypotheses (Chapter 33). Natacha Rey declares that she has just undergone her third police custody, after those of July and December 2021. What relentlessness... Outside France, we learn that Donald Trump is holding secret documents in a safe, the first of which concerns the "President of France". Brigitte is involved... A few media outlets again pick up on what they still call the "rumor", Brigittegate is relaunched (Appendix D 27). On November 29, sufficiently stabilized, the Pressibus 2022 file is closed after an addition on the mayor of Le Touquet, Léonce Deprez, who rigged the marriages of "Brigitte" in 1974 and 2007 (Appendix A 50). The associated pdf file (printable as a book) comprises 211 pages. Postscripts are envisaged (they will be integrated into the pdf). On the media front, calm has returned. |
January to February 2023 | Jean-Louis Auzière finally revives Brigittegate with trial no. 1, which he has brought against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy. They were found guilty. Catherine, Auzière's wife, showed that she had no children of her own. Treatment anomalies provoke an appeal. "The media practice amalgam to claim or suggest that everything said about Brigitte Macron's transsexuality is false and to consider her a victim", so wrote Pressibus's P.-S. 1 of February 1. Lionel Labosse remains the only person to deal with Brigitte Macron on a fairly regular basis in his daily newspaper. He offered the "first lady" a card for her 78th birthday, on February 11 (good math : 78=2023-1945). Brigittologists continue their research, notably on twitter and on the telegram thread "L'affaire Jean-Michel Trogneux". At the end of February, two important discoveries were made: Brigitte Trogneux obtained her "brevet des collèges" in Amiens in 1969, then her "baccalauréat", with honors, in 1972. The Pressibus file shows a correction, estimating that Brigitte n°2's arrival in Amiens, previously estimated at 1972, dates back to around 1961. This corresponds to Jean-Michel's arrival in Algiers, probably on a mission for the secret services: the Auzière and Trogneux families helped each other out. Later, Jean-Michel and Brigitte n°2 wanted to start a family, which was impossible given their administrative status as brother and sister. Hence the rigging of their wedding in 1974 (P.-S. 3). |
March to June 2023 | On March 9, trial no. 2 came to a halt: "The Paris court declared the summons null and void for breach of privacy and image rights, ruling that the facts they were denouncing should have been qualified as public defamation". This was a major setback for the Macron's (P.-S. 4). We then learn that Jean-Michel and Brigitte have filed a libel suit for defamation on January 31, 2022 (why so late?). This will be trial no. 3. Maud Marian, Natacha Rey's lawyer, reveals in March that this trial is nothing but a media decoy: it doesn't deal with the gender change at all, but with falsified civil status documents and statutory rape. This affair between a teacher and his pupil Emmanuel Macron, aged around 15, is however a proven fact, if we refer to several books and the celebrity press (P.-S. 6). On May 16, Pressibus's P.-S. 9 reveals the importance of Georges Costes, Jean-Louis Auzière's brother-in-law : he was head of the secret services in Algeria in the 1950s. As a witness to the 1974 wedding, he was certainly involved in its rigging and the care with which it was carried out, to make people believe in the existence of the phantom groom André Louis Auzière. On June 1, Lionel Labosse, who investigated in Algiers in May, opens a page "Casserolades et brigolades". |
July to August 2023 | On appeal, Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy are convicted in Trial No. 1, brought by the Auzière couple, albeit more leniently than at first instance. They appeal to the Supreme Court (P.-S. 11 and 12). Lionel Labosse publishes a page entitled "Le point sur le Brigittegate au 15 août 2023". He reports on the comments of François Danglehant and Maud Marian, the lawyers for Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy. We discover a very strange photo of André Louis Auzière (the second after that of the wedding), shown in trial n°1 : he is in a bathing suit on his death notice ! (P.-S. 14) The progress of these trials, which do not deal with the main subject, continues to fuel the Brigittegate echo. |
September to November 2023 | Without speaking in the conditional tense, Brigitte Macron declares in the people press in September : "A year and a half that I'm a man" (P.-S. 17). Yes, a year and a half that some French people have known about Brigittegate, almost two years that the "tout-Paris" has known about it, and that journalists in the mainstream media are doing their utmost to hide this Polichinel secret (P.-S. 19). In October, F&D n°525 revisits the affair and reveals that Brigitte Macron is treated by surgeon Patrick Bui, world specialist in the feminization of faces (P.-S. 20) (P.-S. 20). Brigitte Macron claims to have worn a uniform all through school, but it's Jean-Michel (P.-S. 21). This memory lapse adds to the previous ones already identified (studies in Algiers, 1969 Apollo mission...). It is difficult to assume a double identity. Another case will be revealed in July 2024, when Jean-Michel's motorcycle merges with Brigitte's moped (P.-S. 61). |
December 2023 | In Israel, proof of the internationalization of Brigittegate, a large poster is plastered everywhere : "President Macron, what would you do if Jean-Michel were taken hostage ?" (P.-S. 25). It's clear that the French presidency is being blackmailed, using the dual personality of Brigitte / Jean-Michel. Issue 527 of "Faits & Documents" reveals a class photo of Jean-Michel Trogneux. Its comparison with photos of Brigitte Macron taken by China's Face++ software, the most powerful of its kind, indicates that they are the same person. Face++ also asserts that the 1974 bride (in the newspaper photo) is not Brigitte Macron. On the last page, a tree shows that André Louis Auzière (considered real) would be the biological father of the three Auzière children and that Brigitte Trogneux, born in Amiens in 1953, would be their mother, Jean-Michel Trogneux being their uncle. While believing this "F&D527" hypothesis, with two Brigitte (Trogneux then Macron), to be plausible, Pressibus presents another tree, consistent with its 2022 file, with three Brigitte (Trogneux then Auzière then Macron), where André Louis Auzière is fictitious and Jean-Michel is the biological father. The two scenarios are compared, and the essential points are shared and confirmed: Brigitte Macron was born in 1945 under the identity of Jean-Michel Trogneux (P.-S. 24). |
January to February 2024 | The fallout from F&D 527 resonates in several ways. Brigittegate spreads further on Youtube, for example on the "Verdi" and "Le juste milieu" channels (P.-S. 31), or during appearances by writer Zoé Sagan. In F&D 528, dated January but released in February, presenting three new photos of schoolboy Jean-Michel, Xavier Poussard crosses the Rubicon (he is, long since, based in Italy) and switches from the conditional to the affirmative, declaring in his introduction :""Brigitte" was indeed born a man under the name "Jean-Michel Trogneux". This individual, who today calls himself 'Madame la Présidente', became known under the birth identity of his sister, Brigitte Trogneux" (P.-S. 32 and 33). The Elysée will not sue her for defamation for these remarks, but for an old Moroccan affair in which a witness died. Added to this was a tax audit and the closure of his bank accounts. As the brigittologist writer Christian Combaz would later say in his Youtube series "La France de Campagnol" : "When you light so many counter-fires, it's because there's a fire". For its part, Pressibus also takes the plunge: the "Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Trogneux married Macron are the same person" hypothesis is upgraded from "Almost certain, intimate conviction" to "Certain". The number of videos dealing with the affair multiplied, with a high number of hits and comments (P.-S. 36), despite Youtube "shadow banning" censors. Brigittegate has taken on a new dimension. |
March 2024 | A few major media outlets react, as does Tiphaine Auzière, to defend her "mother", with nothing but indignation. Nothing factual. Xavier Poussard is interviewed by a few small media outlets, which get a big audience (P.-S. 38 to 40). Tension mounts. On March 8, Emmanuel Macron, in response to a journalist's question, mentions Brigittegate for the first time, considered "the worst memory" he has for his wife. He speaks of "fake news and scenarios put together" by "fadas". The mainstream media went into a frenzy to defend the poor victims of the Elysée Palace. Once again, it's all propaganda, nothing factual (P.-S. 41). In hindsight, it appears that Emmanuel Macron was ahead of the game. On March 14, we learn that, on the other side of the Atlantic, renowned journalist Candace Owens, close to the Republican party, has produced a video, based on the dossier Pressibus in English. She presents Brigittegate and considers it "insane, the greatest political scandal in human history". She says she is "ready to bet my professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is actually a man" (P.-S. 42). In a second video, on March 14, she insists on the absence of photos of the Auzière family and their three children (P.-S. 43). Nothing but facts on the substance of the case. On March 16, Emmanuelle Anizon, a journalist with the "Nouvel Obs", published her book entitled "L'affaire Madame". The factual content only covers the descriptions of Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard and a few other brigittologists, there's virtually nothing on the substance of the affair, just a few ancillary, even ridiculous points like her meeting with a vapid Jean-Michel "little fatty" (P.-S. 44, analysis by brigittologist Dominique Droin). She makes the rounds of the mainstream media, who welcome with open arms the woman who subtitled her book "Anatomy of Fake News". She makes an interesting comparison with Michelle Obama, who energetically and factually defended herself from the accusation of being a man by showing photos and documents from her childhood, thus reducing the rumor mill. Then surprised by "Brigitte's" silence, rightly asserting that "Silence feeds suspicion", the ingenuous or vicious Emmanuelle Anizon fails to understand what all brigittologists and all the curious studying the dossier without a priori have easily understood : this "first lady" really was born Jean-Michel Trogneux (P.-S. 44). |
April 2024 | After this explosive month of March, Lionel Labosse published several pages including this one entitled "Understanding #Brigittegate for Dummies and this one, surprising and revealing, titled "Artificial " intelligence " confronted with the fake of the alleged " Brigitte " Macron". He adds, on April 20, this one asking "Why do so-called " journalists " lie so brazenly about Brigittegate?". Laurence Auzière publishes an old photo of herself at around age 4, uninteresting because neither of her parents is present. Brigittologist Jol Vil discovers the liaison between the Trogneux family and cousin Jacqueline Ledoux, married to the grandson of an Algiers mayor, who probably facilitated her young neighbor Jean-Michel's trips to Algiers (P.-S. 48). We learn that Natacha Rey is suffering from a very serious form of cancer... On April 20, Pressibus's Post-Scriptum 49 presents an analysis by a professional graphologist confirming that the 1974 bride is not Brigitte Macron. The following P.-S., dated April 23, delves deeper into two key points in the case, with a few new elements: the disappearance of Brigitte n°1 in 1960 and the existence of Brigitte n°2 "Proba" Auzière. |
May to June 2024 | Electoral concerns resurface with the defeat of the Macronians in the European elections, followed by Emmanuel Macron's surprise dissolution of the National Assembly, and then by the widespread defeat of his supporters in the legislative elections. Are we heading for the resignation, or even impeachment, of the former "Jupiter" ? He is increasingly booed at his public appearances, which are becoming rare and highly protected. Amiens deputy François Ruffin publicly called him a "taré" (P.-S. 53), but dared go no further, as he went on to support him in the second round of the legislative elections. An intersex person (born hermaphrodite), Alexandra Brazzainville, intervenes to defend Emmanuel Macron's mother, whose job was to accompany people wishing to undergo an administrative sex change. In April (P.-S. 55) and September (P.-S. 72), she intervenes twice, as a good connoisseur of the subject and praising the courage of Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard. On June 19, a hearing takes place in the No. 3 libel suit. The two-faced accuser was of course absent, as was Natacha Rey, who was ill. Lionel Labosse publishes a report, showing what a "true-false trial" it is. As far as Brigittegate is concerned, the mainstream media often pick up on the official AFP propaganda, but more of them keep quiet, a sign of too slow an evolution (P.-S. 57). |
July to August 2024 | Criticism of the Macron couple's perverse governance increases, notably from Marc Endeweld, a journalist with "Marianne", who speaks of neo-fascism (P.-S. 58). Retaliation against a number of brigittologists becomes more severe. After Natacha Rey and Xavier Poussard, it's the turn of Amandine Roy, François Danglehant, Zoé Sagan and even Candace Owens to get into very serious trouble (P.-S. 69). Lionel Labosse is censored on Youtube (P.-S. 62). His site is hacked in October. In August, the Paris Olympic Games capture the attention of the mainstream media. The opening ceremony, a symbol of turpitude and decadence, appears to have been initiated by the presidential couple (P.-S. 63). The IOC apologizes. The video is banned in several countries, and the broadcasting of extracts is practically forbidden everywhere. On August 9, after the Pressibus and F&D527 scenarios, a third plausible hypothesis of Jean-Michel Trogneux's life is presented by the brigittologist "Colonel de Guerlasse", in P.-S. 64, partly based on the NBI dossier of February 2022. On August 22, a photo of Brigitte Macron's crotch in a bathing suit triggers an international tidal wave on social networks. Journalist Alba Ventura reacted very strongly on TF1 television, calling for the "vermin" of brigittologists to be "eradicated" (P.S. 65). Apart from two complosphere obsessives (P.-S. 74), however, she is not followed by AFP and the other major media. Her call to hatred is shocking new observers, such as anthropologist Jean-Dominique Michel (P.-S. 66). |
September 2024 | On September 12, the verdict of trial no. 3 is delivered: Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy are found guilty, on secondary aspects of the case. Led by the Elysée Palace and AFP, the mainstream media - albeit less massively than before - are quick to draw an amalgam to suggest that the conviction is about Brigitte Macron's masculine nature (P.-S. 68). On Youtube and the networks, strong criticism spreads, with Natacha and Amandine, as well as their lawyers, denouncing the multiple manipulations of the trial (P.-S. 69). There's also an Owens/Poussard video, another Sagan/Poussard/Combaz (P.-S. 67). This backfires on the Macron couple, who even try to hide the details of the judgment. Pressibus's P.-S. 67 and 73 sum up Macron's links with the Rothschild family and with the family of Bernard Arnault, who saw his fortune swell in Macronie, until he became the richest man in the world. On September 17, for the first time in the Fifth Republic, a soft impeachment procedure for the President of the Republic was launched in the National Assembly (P.-S. 70). Unsurprisingly, it failed on October 8. For many months already (P.-S. 54 in June 2024), several appeals to elected representatives, notably by Lionel Labosse, had been calling for this impeachment procedure, but more forcefully, based on Brigittegate. |
October 2024 | In Amiens, the law is not respected when it comes to Jean-Bri-Bri (Pressibus nickname for the amalgam of Jean-Michel and the Brigitte family) (or Jean-Brichel, nickname by Lionel Labosse, or Brichel by Verdi, etc.). ) : there is obstruction from the town hall (Natacha Rey and the 1953 birth certificate, in 2021), religious institutions (Xavier Poussard and school documents over 50 years old) and the prefecture (Colonel de Guerlasse and the 2024 elections) (P.- S. 64 and 76). Issues 531 and 532 of "Faits & Documents" revive the investigation. It was proved that the same person was in the photo of the communicant and the 1974 bride. A third photo was added. Pressibus found information that led to the discovery of new clues supporting the scenario of his 2022 dossier: Brigitte n°1 would not have been at school, Brigitte n°2 would have entered Amiens late, at the age of 8, in CE2, in 1960, and would have been a witness at a wedding in 1976, without saying that she was married (since, in 1974, it was to a ghost...) (P.- S. 75 and 76). The year 2024, not yet over, will continue to be marked by a media expansion of Brigittegate, a subject that has become a regular feature on video channels, notably those featuring interviews by Mike Borowski of "Géopolitique profonde" and Clémence Houdiakova of "Tocsin". Comedians such as Dr Alwest, Aubontouitefrançais and Sébastien Recchia are not to be outdone. Singers, like Monsieur Zurlu or Sarah Jane Iffra (page). Graphic designers (page)... On the other hand, despite AFP's close ties to the government, the mainstream media are becoming more cautious about "transphobic rumors", preferring to remain silent. Finally, the third anniversary of Brigittegate will be celebrated around Sunday October 20... Until who-knows-who turns 80 on February 11, 2025... |
![]() Zoé Sagan |
![]() Bertrand Scholler |
![]() On the grounds of :
Since the mid-1980s, a 79-year-old man by the name of Jean-Michel Trogneux, born on February 11, 1945 in Amiens, has been usurping the identity of his younger sister Brigitte Trogneux, born on April 13, 1953 in Amiens and now missing since 1960, by presenting himself as a woman. For several decades, this man has been in possession of official identity documents, which he uses and which have been supplied to him by public officials who have thus committed criminal forgery. In September 1992, while working as a French teacher at a secondary school in Amiens, this 47-year-old man, presenting himself as a woman and calling herself Brigitte Trogneux, met the young Emmanuel Macron, born in Amiens on December 21, 1977, and initiated a sexual relationship with him, when the latter was only 14 years old. This constitutes sexual assault and rape of a minor, by an adult with authority and more than five years' age difference. Neither the public servants nor the other adults with knowledge of this situation will report it to the competent authorities, as they are required to do by law. In 2007, Mr. Jean-Michel Trogneux officially entered into marriage with Mr. Emmanuel Macron, even though marriage between two people of the same sex has only been authorized by law since 2013. This marriage is therefore illegal, null and void. Since that date, Mr. Jean-Michel Trogneux has presented himself as "Brigitte Trogneux, épouse Macron" and soon, since 2017, as the wife of the President of the French Republic, which formally constitutes usurpation of office punishable by law. In June and September 2024, Mr. Jean-Michel Trogneux represented himself before the 17th Correctional Chamber of the Paris Judicial Court under the double identity of Jean-Michel Trogneux and Brigitte Macron, in order to obtain damages from the defendants he had sued for defamation. This constitutes a fraudulent misrepresentation. This case of identity theft, forgery, corruption of minors, illegal marriage, usurpation of functions and fraudulent judgement is now known to state authorities in most countries in the world. This case thus offers several states with an interest in it the means to blackmail and impose economic and political pressures and demands on the French state, which seriously undermine the nation's fundamental interests and jeopardize the very lives of its population. French citizens and voters have been direct victims of this set of deceptions, crimes and misdemeanors especially since 2017, when Mr. Emmanuel Macron, who will be considered a victim of Mr. Jean-Michel Trogneux's psychological hold through abuse of weakness, was elected President of the French Republic. Video of 18 mn presenting, in french, the complaint in detail and ending with an invitation to participate. Monsieur Jean-Michel Trogneux objectively needs to get out of the lie, as does France as a whole, whose state has for several years been trapping the population in a set of deceptions that can only generate suffering and violence. |
1960. Brigitte Trogneux, aged 8, dies of an illness considered shameful by her family. Her parents refused to declare her dead, and arranged for another little girl, Brigitte Auzière, born in Cameroon and living in Madagascar, of the same age and somewhat similar, to replace her in Amiens. Everything hinges on this initial lie. 1974. In 1972, Brigitte Auzière, aged 19, was so well integrated into her adopted family that a love affair was born between her and her supposed older brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, aged 27. They want to start a family. The Trogneux and Auzière parents realize that, because of their lie in 1960, the brother and pseudo-sister are prevented from doing so. It's not right... They need to fix it. Since the Auzières are well-established in the secret services, and Father Trogneux is a close friend of Le Touquet mayor Léonce Desprez, they invent a sham marriage in 1974 in Le Touquet, between a phantom groom, André Auzière, Brigitte Auzière's male double, born in Cameroon, and the deceased Brigitte Trogneux, played by Brigitte Auzière. The children would thus have biological parents Trogneux-Auzière and fictitious administrative parents Auzière-Trogneux, with the same four grandparents. A game of sleight of hand. 1980. The 1974 marriage worked well, and two children were born in Amiens, Sébastien and Laurence Auzière. However, Jean-Michel is hardly ever present with Brigitte, not least because his name is not André Auzière (who is obviously absent). What's more, he suffers from gender dysphoria, which leads him to live sometimes as a man, sometimes as a transsexual woman, the Véronique interviewed on TV in 1977 (Chapter 14). This generates new lies. As if this wasn't complicated enough, Jean-Michel founds a second family, this one official and legal, with Véronique Dreux, a marriage celebrated in 1980 in Blangy-Tronville. The presence of Brigitte Auzière (under her birth name) as Jean-Michel's best man raises questions and suggests a ménage à trois, with all the lies that can entail... 1984. Jean-Michel Trogneux had a very complicated life: sometimes a man, sometimes a woman, sometimes in his first home, sometimes in his second, five children, the last two born on January 30 and February 20, 1984. Somehow, he managed it all. So it's hardly surprising that, 60 years later, under the name Brigitte Macron, he's managing the lies of a less complex situation... But those around him find it harder to accept all this, especially the mother of the three Auzière children who, in addition to assuming the identity of the deceased Brigitte Trogneux, has to accept cohabitation with a second wife and her two children. For her, it's all becoming unmanageable. Jean-Michel Trogneux, with the help of Jean-Louis Auzière, Brigitte's young uncle, chooses to change the configuration, while maintaining the previous lies. The administrative Brigitte Trogneux lives on, but is now embodied by her brother Jean-Michel himself: from father of the three Auzière children, he becomes their mother. And he gets rid of the rest: his status as a man, his second family (divorce), and the mother of the three children (she's been exiled and lives near Lille). To tackle this new life and forge this new identity, he settled near Strasbourg, far from Amiens. To do this, he needs the agreement of his two oldest children, Sébastien, 9, and Laurence, 7. Would they accept their mother moving away and being replaced by their father? Jean-Michel, now Brigitte Macron, says: ""I know I've hurt my children, and that's the thing I blame myself for most. But I couldn't not do it, there are times in your life when you make vital choices. And for me, it was" (end of Chapter 10). 2007. Jean-Michel Trogneux managed to pass himself off as both his deceased sister Brigitte Trogneux and the exiled mother of his children, Brigitte Auzière. Now a French teacher, he moved back to Amiens in 1991, where his family is still living the lie of 1960, to which was added that of 1984. But Jean-Michel, who likes dangerous situations, began an affair with a 14-year-old teenager, Emmanuel Macron, in 1992, at the age of 47. Both now live in Paris and wish to validate their union (the same concern for respectability as in 1974). Since marriage between two men is forbidden, they once again had to cheat. First, in January 2006, a divorce is granted to the fictitious André Auzière, in circumstances that we don't know (did Jean-Louis Auzière play the role of the divorced man?) Next, the marriage had to be falsified. Léonce Desprez, the elderly mayor of Le Touquet, is finishing his last term in 2008. It's time to put him to the test, one last time. As in 1974, he gave the bride a false identity, the groom's being the right one this time. It's 2007, and this new lie adds to and reinforces the previous ones. This paved the way for the Macron couple's ascent to the Elysée Palace. At the same time, the man who claims to be Jean-Michel Trogneux continues to exist for administrative reasons (title deeds, participation in a commercial company...). Living in an empty apartment in Amiens, he has lodged a complaint against Natacha Rey, without however appearing at the hearings. He is even said to have voted in June 2024, which the Amiens prefecture refuses to confirm. No death certificate in his name has been found. It's as if he's living in another body, living a series of lies... |
The age of young Macron when he met Brigitte. When her husband was appointed Minister of the Economy on August 26, 2014, the media knew little about Brigitte Macron. In 2012, the age gap, was estimated at around twenty years, they would have been 36 and 17 when they first met. In the words of Eric Stemmelen, quoted by Xavier Poussard {F&D 497]: "A 36-year-old woman and a 17-year-old boy could become a romantic idyll worthy of the pen of a Stendhal a 39-year-old woman and a 14-year-old boy would arouse a suspicion of pedophilia. Acclimatize the good people to this unusual couple, by disguising a too crude truth, which will only be revealed little by little, in successive snippets in 2016". After 36/17, the new truth 39/14 remains a lie of the reality 47/14, which nobody, before 2021, could guess. And even if, after 2016, the 39/14 age gap is admitted, the offence of statutory rape it implies is carefully erased, notably during the 2022 election campaign. So much so, in fact, that Brigitte Macron can afford to deny the offence when Natacha Rey or Zoé Sagan denounce it. Brigitte Macron's diplomas. Xavier Poussard in F&D 498."In short, between 2017 and 2021, Brigitte Macron lost her mention très bien at the baccalauréat, which she finally obtained a year late, then her maîtrise de lettres which became a mere "certificate", then her Capes which we were assured she had obtained.... In short, "Brigitte" would have made a teaching career in the most prestigious establishments without any diploma required..." The marginalization of unofficial information. Xavier Poussard (F&D 498, 2021): "While Mandatori France (Closer) and Lagardère (Paris-Match, France Dimanche, etc.) allow the Macron couple to saturate the public space (train stations, streets, supermarkets), the Internet is daily crammed with content supplied jointly by 6Médias and Bestimage, Michèle Marchand's agency, to the websites of the Prism group's titles. [...] Each day sees one or two pieces of content relayed by all the group's media sites (the famous "synergy"). [...] Typing Brigitte Macron's name into Google brings up over ten million results. [...] This saturation of media space masks a total lock-down of information and the sidelining of journalists. In 2024, the omnipresence of people pages persists. For example, it is very difficult to reach this page via search engines." The existence of Jean-Michel Trogneux. In 2017, whether on genealogical sites or elsewhere, Brigitte had no older brother Jean-Michel. He only appeared in 2019 in a book by Sylvie Bommel. In September 2021, in F&D 501, Xavier Poussard did not yet know that this mysterious Jean-Michel Trogneux, whom he suspected to be Brigitte Macron, had married Véronique Dreux in 1980, with whom he had two children. The first, Jean-Jacques, was nevertheless present, incognito, at the 2017 Elysée investiture (Chapter 11). Poussard only mentions this in F&D 503, January 2022 : "Why has the existence of Jean-Jacques Trogneux never been mentioned when official biographers have made tons about the members of the Trogneux clan ?" Later, the mainstream media didn't dare tell the lie about the "little fatty" whom some presented as Jean-Michel Trogneux (Appendix A 7), it was too implausible. The fictitious André Louis Auzière was always presented as real. A few major media outlets were surprised by his great discretion, but their curiosity stopped there... Brigitte Macron is defamed, notably by Natacha Rey. The courts have confirmed it, and AFP has reported it. But we don't go into the details, to make people believe that the judicial condemnation, which is not definitive, concerns the fact that "Brigitte" is a man. Brigitte Macron is a woman: that's obvious, since she's dressed as a woman and married to a man, and not just any man ! Silence on inconvenient facts. The evidence and clues that Brigitte Macron is biologically a man are hidden. The general public must be kept in the dark. |
|
![]() |
Emma's false (?) testimony. Here is the text exposed in this tweet, spelling included:
Testimonial. I met Brigitte Macron in 1994 when she was promoting gender transition to transvestite prostitutes. She didn't have a wig at the time and her name wasn't Brigitte but Veronica, but in the milieu she was called "Coupe zizi" because she encouraged transvestites to have vaginoplasty. Please contact me. I'm sure we can nail him down by pursuing this lead. My name was Emma from Parc de la tête d'or in Lyons. Registered as a transvestite prostitute with the Lyons police department in 1992-1995. |
Extract from @truthhurst4217 remarks made in comment replies three months ago, so in October 2024. (it's written in fast French, with big spelling mistakes, which may come from translation errors) I have an anecdote. In 1993/1994, I was working on the docks in trav. One day I went to the Cabiria club for prostitutes and junkies, there was a blonde there that day who had attracted quite a few people from the night. When I asked what was going on, my colleague Dannie replied: It's coupe-zizi! She wants the travs to make the transition and they can be reimbursed for the cost of the operation. I retorted: "She doesn't get it, if you work as a woman it's for the money. It pays better than being a gigolo. If we do breasts, we'll have to walk around as women all day! I'm fine. It's not my thing! In Veronika aka coupe-zizi's speech, there was this way of always starting sentences with: c'est à dire que ... (1) I was doubly annoyed because her language was part of a certain class of society out of touch with reality. She reminded me of the way my grandmother used to talk. Later, when I became Brigitte, I didn't recognize her right away, especially with the wig, but when I heard her in an interview on TF1, I fell on my ass when I heard coupe zizi! The same but with a wig and a few years older! For me, it's clear. I met her when she was still wearing her natural wavy hair. Not very thick, by the way. What a story! To have a transvestite as your first wife, I never would have believed it! Emma , ancient trav of the parc de la tête d'or period 93-95. I didn't do it for the pleasure of wearing a wig, but for the money. I'm from a good family and I couldn't get a job, so I was ashamed to ask the family for money. I worked as a guy at first, but when you make 10x more money in heels then... I did that for 2 years no more. Then I married a woman. Just goes to show .... My story is complicated, it's coming out soon in book form: naked for my sister 😉 (2) That's exactly what brought back memories. I That unnatural rattle voice. Finally after the morning of the Adam's apple the low tones are gone but it's still the same voice. @kococool my testimony wouldn't add much. I don't have a precise date. But it could be found in the archives. Unless they've been deleted. That's for sure. But is it really worth taking risks for so little in the end? Because the French aren't waking up anyway. Yes, it's all there in front of our eyes, but nobody can see it. It's hallucinating this society where people are duped. If you want proof, you'll have to ask Cabiria. I don't know if Martine is still running the brothel - I'd be surprised if she's over 70 - but you can probably find it in the archives if you want to look around. 😌 Yes. I worked for 3 years at the children's door in the Rhône. I was registered with the police with my location. We were the only ones who didn't do drugs. The mother of manquerons [Macron] worked with the social security, she was responsible for the reimbursement of trans operations. Apparently she was on tour! She did all the towns in France. So why not Metz? I'm sure it'll turn up |
![]() ![]() published by Emma under the name Stéphane de Charnage, born in France in 1974 (link) Torn between two worlds, I grew up caught between the opulence of my aristocratic mother and the simplicity of my peasant father. The toxic grip of my jealous sister drove me to run away. Finding refuge in Thailand, I hid my true nature for decades. Reunited with my half-sister, I revealed the unfiltered story of my tumultuous life: love, heartbreak, drugs, prostitution, incest and rock'n'roll. Join me on a poignant journey of self-discovery and forgiveness. During my years at Cabiria, I had the pleasure of running into well-known faces on several occasions, and a transsexual known in the trade as "Coupe-zizi", because she encouraged travelers to make the transition. She was known as Véroniqua, but today everyone knows her by a totally different name. When I see all the media drama surrounding the affair, it makes me laugh out loud. On the one hand, I don't understand how so many people can let themselves be fooled, and on the other, the fact that a homosexual couple has settled at the top. Boy, the world I was born into has sure changed! At the same time, Veroniqua's operations were superbly performed, but hey, I'm a hairdresser and I know the difference between a man's hair implantation and a woman's, even with a wig. Above all, there's a clip of her on the internet when she was a teacher, sitting like a man with her legs spread (3). I can assure you that in 35 years of hairdressing, the only woman I've ever seen sitting in my chair like a man was a Thai lesbian. When I saw her ass drop with her knees at 120 degrees I said to her: - Sir! She loved it like crazy. I then asked her where she'd learned to sit like a man and she replied that she'd taken masculinity classes on purpose to look as much like a manly man as possible. So, unless the alleged celebrity took classes.... You'll understand that I'm not mentioning the name of this famous woman, I don't want to get in trouble for such a small moment in my life. |
![]() But before it came to that, the lovers had to face the wrath of Emmanuel Macron's parents, who didn't take kindly to his idyll with an older woman. Worried about their beloved son's future, Mr. and Mrs. Macron even decided to abruptly withdraw him from his school in Amiens and "exile" him to Paris. Although a lot of water has passed under the bridge since then, Françoise Noguès, the mother of the former Minister of the Economy, has not forgotten the wounds of the past. She even decided to recount them to journalist Anna Fulda in the book Emmanuel Macron, "Un jeune homme si parfait". In it, the mother of the family talks about the woman who eclipsed her in her own son's heart: the omnipresent Brigitte. In its new issue, on newsstands Friday April 6, Closer explains why the relationship between the two women hasn't always been a happy one, far from it! Chapter 16, Hervé Algalarrino's book "Deux jeunesses françaises" (2021) : His French teacher Jeanne Verdier admitted to discovering that Emmanuel had exfiltrated for Paris in September and that his parents were close to lodging a complaint. Chapter 24 (link in point 5), article from "Télé-Loisirs" (2021) on Gaël Tchakaloff's book "Tant qu'on est tous les deux" : To write her book, the author was able to meet Emmanuel Macron's mother, Françoise Noguès. She is the one who lived the love story between Emmanuel and Brigitte from its very beginnings. The mother of the family witnessed the rumors and backbiting that accompanied the couple's 24-year courtship. The mother of the family was therefore the ideal person to help Gaël Tchakaloff understand the Macron couple. "She idolizes her son," writes the Le Point journalist. For this mother, she needed a companion to match her son's ambitions. It would take time for the President's mother to understand that her son was living the love story of his life, "for years" according to the biographer. But after "a few warnings about the age difference", Emmanuel Macron's mother found Brigitte Macron to be her best ally. The two women have known each other all their lives. They were neighbors in Amiens. "I knew and admired her because she had been the French teacher of Estelle, my youngest daughter. I saw a lot of her," explains Françoise Noguès. "For me, Brigitte is not a daughter-in-law. We have the same affinities, the same priorities, we tell each other everything", she continues. |
His family situation at the time was as follows: aged 49, he was the father of three children aged 19, 17 and 10, whom he brought up alone, pretending to be their mother. The mother, Brigitte Auzière, lives in northern France, probably under a false name. JMT has also been divorced for seven years from Véronique Dreux, with two other children aged 12 and 10, who live with their mother and a stepfather. For the past three years, JMT has been a teacher at Lycée La Providence in Amiens, under the name Brigitte Auzière née Trogneux. He lives in Amiens at 17, rue Saint-Simon, where everyone (or almost everyone) considers him to be the mother of his three Auzière children. Since the 1970s, and in particular his television interview in 1977 (2), in the wake of Pastor Doucé, under the name Véronique / Véronica, JMT has been campaigning to help people with gender dysphoria become transsexuals. His mentor died in 1990, 4 years ago, and he wants to continue his work. Building on his long-standing friendship with FN, who works for the CPAM on gender transition files, he approaches transvestite prostitutes across France, in Lyons, perhaps in Metz, far from Amiens, to avoid being recognized. His love affair with teenager EM, the son of his FN friend, has leaked into the Henriville neighborhood. The situation is delicate, and EM's parents are reluctant to press charges. Fortunately, JMT keeps his life separate, which allows him to be Brigitte, Jean-Michel (from time to time, in front of the notary...) or Véronica, known as "Coupe-zizi". This nickname shows just how insistent he is in his "evangelization" aimed at trivializing gender change. In the 1990s, this transformation was exceptional and ignored, still confidential. Véronica is so persuasive and skilful that, surely, this clandestinity would change if, one day, she were to lead France (3)... On the Trogneux side of the family, big brother Jean-Claude jumped up and down when he learned of the affair with teenage EM (4). He would have had a heart attack had he known about Véronica's activities... But JMT has enjoyed living dangerously since his youth, under several identities... And his family, after all, is responsible for the deceitful life he has led since 1960, with the Auzières... What's more, he likes to leave Amiens to free himself from the hostility he now feels there, and to rediscover the aspirations of his youth, with Pastor Doucé... As for his three children, whom he leaves to become Coupe-zizi, the two eldest are old enough to fend for themselves, and the youngest, Tiphaine, is sent to see her mother in Lille (5). |
![]() Those who doubted that Brigitte Macron was the Véronique of 1977 (profile), despite the evidence provided, should admit it with the testimonies of Natacha Rey and Stéphane de Charnage. |
To @EmmanuelMacron Please instruct your lawyers to not ever tell an American what they can and cannot publish. You have kept many secrets in your life, but I am not your personal diary—all correspondences between our legal teams will be available for the public to read. We will be back to your team tomorrow with specific questions for you answer ahead of the publication of our much wider look into Brigitte"s earlier life. As we have already stated, the minor factual errors that we made regarding who gave birth to Brigitte"s children will be corrected. Similarly, we will correct our assertion that the communion photo presented as evidence of her youth was recolored. We now know that it was not recolored, but we maintain that the person in the communion photo is NOT your wife and we have strong evidence to support that claim. We are not in the business of telling lies. Therefore we expect that you will, provided the opportunity, simply answer the substance of the question as to whether or not your current wife lived as a man prior to transitioning. We look forward to being in touch. |
|
On this Sunday afternoon, news is still coming in from all over the world, proving the huge impact of Candace's video. Beware of infoxes, however, like this fake endorsement from Australian Julian Assange. And "In response to the threatening letter signed by a bailiff, sent by Brigitte Macron. The Secretary General of the Elysée has just received a letter from Candace Owens asking how Brigitte could have studied at university in Algeria in 1962 given that she was born in 1953" (tweet).
Will our mainstream media finally move in the right direction? At least to stop supporting the Elysée... Things didn't get off to a good start in the evening, with the first article in the "Parisien" (owned by Bernard Arnault) (not based on an AFP press release) denigrating the very "conspiracy-minded" Candace Owens, who was allegedly feeding "fake news". Criticize the messenger when you want to hide the problem. And conclude with a reminder of the Macron's' serious threats of legal action against those who talk too much. Well, after all, it's better than some people's silence... |
![]() |
On Brigittegate, the silence of "Le Canard Enchaîné" and "Médiapart" is so deafening as to be an admission. That of "Charlie Hebdo", too. Imagine if Reiser ot Cabu were still around, they wouldn't admit that such a subject, known to millions of French people and all over the world, was taboo! They would've laughed his ass off! It's appalling to see how, under Macronie, these media have become defenders of the powers that be, avoiding the only subject that can really turn them on their head. A reversal, a mea culpa, seems even unthinkable, so compromised have they become.
Lionel Labosse reacted to point n°9 of our previous P.-S., which ended with "Pas trop Charlie, hein, le couple présidentiel...". And, with Hortense, he put himself in the shoes of a "Charlie Hebdo" journalist-drawer from thirty years ago (his journal). See below, center, the result (the rest on this page)... |
![]() |
![]() Mr. and Mr. Macron. This video, 24 seconds long, confirms the vision of the "famous photo" (P.-S. 65) | ![]() ![]() Hortense, based on Coco and Luz, from Charlie Hebdo, on ideas by Lionel Labosse | ![]() The kid grew up, he already had big feet... Roland Gravier (on Twitter) |
![]() ![]() |
Beautiful speech by Manuel Bompard at the National Assembly (video of 10 min), taking stock of Macronism. "Mr. Prime Minister, this new France, true to its maxim Freedom, Equality, Fraternity, is biding its time. You can always waste our time, but you won't prevent its emergence".
LFI, the Greens, the PS, the RN, when are you going to stop wasting our time? When are you really going to do something about it? You've been wasting our time for three years now with your refusal to take Brigittegate into account! Identity theft, statutory rape, judgment fraud, lies that falsified two presidential elections, etc., you're ignoring them. Where is EQUALITY before the law? You have turned a deaf ear to Lionel Labosse's requests for a parliamentary commission. You say nothing about the censorship and stifling that prevent FREEDOM of expression on these rotten media that intoxicate us, but where you can express yourself. You don't dare use the word "Apartheid" to describe what happened in 2021, which was a senseless affront to FRATERNITY. So when are you REALLY going to do something to put an end to Macronism? Join us, follow the impetus given by Natacha Rey, Xavier Poussard, Candace Owens: only Brigittegate will topple Macron quickly. So that a new France can emerge, cleansed of the crooked media and the enslaved Justice system, which are INCAPABLE of playing their role as checks and balances. Let's turn the tables, turn the tables! |
["Coupe-zizi" means "Willy cutter", "C'est-à-dire" means "That is to say"] I was a gigolo in Lyons from the age of 18 to 20. And there was an association, Cabiria by the name [in aid of prostitutes, still in existence, site] that was starting to run. It was a bus that visited prostitutes to distribute condoms and give out coffee. This association warmed us up on winter evenings, it was really nice. They had a room where we met quite often, where we could use computers, where we could do a lot of things. ![]() One day, I went there, I think it was in April-May, the weather was fine, yes April-May 1995. That day, there were a lot of people there, and I wondered what was going on. And I asked my friend from work, whose name was Dany, what was going on : "- Honey, that's Coupe-zizi. - What, who's Coupe-zizi? - It's the other crazy girl from Paris, again... She wants to cut the wieners off the trannies... - What's all this about?" Dany tells me that this person there was actually trying to promote operations for transsexuals. We weren't interested in that, and that's why the story made such an impression on me. I replied to Dany: "But Cocotte, her story doesn't make sense because we work as women, not because we feel like women, but because thus we make more money". For the gigolo job, there was no more work, so we put on wigs and heels to go to work as women. But we didn't feel like women. And, of all the transvestites who worked as women in Lyons in those years, around 92-95, it was, let's say, 10% of people who felt truly feminine and were ready to take the plunge, but the rest were people who did it for money. The big problem is that when you become a woman, when you do your breasts, there's no going back, you can't walk any more down the street as a man, you've got a pair of breasts. That's why we weren't interested in doing either the breasts or the bottom. So Véronique, because her name was Véronique, found herself quite unprepared, this lady, Véronique or Véronica. I think we called her Véronica, because we travesties were all called by a-names, Anastasia, Emma, etc. And Véronique said: "Si, si, si! And Véronique would say: "Si, si, you have to have the operation, you'll see, it's fantastic, it's reimbursed by the state, etc". And that was that, but I didn't think there was much coherence in what she was saying. I told myself she was a bourgeois. Because in the world of transvestites, at night, there aren't many educated people, so to speak. Luckily, I had an education behind me, and so did Dany. We were really the only two who were educated in this profession, and we didn't do it for very long, only in transition. So I thought, "She's a bourgeoise, the way she talks: C'est-à-dire que ... C'est-à-dire que ...". This way of speaking had stuck with me, "It means that etc.". I said to myself that she didn't understand anything about the current social issues surrounding transvestites. Why are we in this business? Apparently, as is the case with the elites, they have no knowledge of street jobs, of the people down below. They pretend to know, but they don't know anything at all. They thought it was the right place to find people to make a transition. They thought they were working as women because they felt like women, but in fact, it's not like that at all. This narrative of "C'est-à-dire" had made such an impression on me that, one day, while watching TF1 news, picked up in a YouTube video, I heard this same person saying "C'est-à-dire", "C'est-à-dire". I wasn't watching TV at the time, the video was in the background. I went to the front and realized it was Brigitte Macron. I'd have bet my life it was Coupe-zizi. |
![]() CC (Christian Cotten). - In your opinion, Stéphane, is he/she undergoing surgery or not? SdC. - Ah, I've no idea, but I don't think so. Because it seems to me, but I can't swear to it, it seems to me that Dany said to me: "And what's more, she's not even operated on... Another one who advertises an operation when she hasn't had one..." [smiles]. Her appearance didn't make much of an impression on us, but it did, because, at the time, we joked to each other: "Attention, hein, on va appeler Coupe-zizi...". Things like that... We made quite a few jokes about her, this bourgeois woman who came into prostitution circles... Anyway, it was weird... CC. - So, there's one thing that intrigued us when I talked to a few other people about your testimony: the date. Because in '93, '94, '95, the person we're talking about, whom I'm avoiding naming, because there you go..., whatever, had already met the man at the very top of the state pyramid. She was already in contact with him. So... How can we understand it? SdC. - Her campaign in the associations was just on weekends, so it could be done at any time. They were just little tours, like this one... CC. - It wasn't his day-to-day occupation. SdC. - There must be a trace of all that in the associations, because they're in all walks of life..., all over France. He must have done the women's bus in Paris, the women's bus in Bordeaux, as well as the women's bus in Lyons. So, I think we need to dig deeper into the history of Marseille, Lyons, Bordeaux... In Lyons, there was just one transsexual who took the opportunity to have the operation, following Véronique's prognosis. She already wanted the operation, and since it was free... The transsexual's name was Claire. She had a stage name called [hesitations] Cristal or Pearl. Cristal something... And there are traces, we can find her. I'm sure we can find her, this transsexual, if she's not dead, but I don't think so. CC. - It's quite clear. I've taken out the book you published on Amazon, which must be called "A poil pour ma soeur", I found the title quite funny, I've taken out half a page which I'll publish with the video which is the text you wrote concerning this story [...]. In the end, I don't have any other question, because the only real question we had was: is this testimony sincere, is it authentic, is it not a manipulation by someone sending a troll, as we say on the Internet now, to manipulate our heads. That's not the feeling I got from talking to you. So there you have it... What's more, you published this book very recently, I think on December 28 or something like that. SdC. - Yes, yes, I wrote it last year, because, as I wrote on my book, I have a family that is quite disparate and [cut], in fact I got naked for my sister and that's why the book has that title. It's not because I'm undressing, well... I'm mentally undressing. CC. - Yes, it's a way of telling the story of your life. SdC. - I've always loved double-meanings and double-games... Just as I've had a double life in a sense... |
![]() Image circulating on the Internet, recreating their first meeting. A taboo subject for Paris-Match & Cie. |
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond the case of Olivier Duhamel, a member of the presidential couple's closest entourage, the release of La familia grande in January 2021 will have shaken three pillars of the Macronie :
After the earthquake caused by the revelation of Olivier Duhamel's incest, our feature on "Youth, education and sexuality in Macronia" looks at the presidential couple's relationship with the judiciary, with the promotion at Place Vendôme of Eric Dupond-Moretti, the "Ogre of Outreau" who took part, during a trial in Amiens, in constructing the narrative of a "consensual incest", even a "happy" one, a strange conception of Justice, childhood and sexuality confirmed by the promotion to head an incest commission, then to the High Council of the Judiciary of the "Sanaryenne" Elisabeth Guigou, whose time at Place de Vendôme was marked by a more than ambiguous attitude to handling paedocriminal cases.... The rest of our explosive dossier on "Youth, education and sexuality" in Macronia looks at the retention "whatever the cost" of Jack Lang as head of the Arab World Institute. However, in addition to his age and an international context in which the Arab-Muslim world is massively turning away from the West as embodied by Jack Lang, there has been no shortage of opportunities since Emmanuel Macron became President of the Republic to send the man whose name resurfaces, like a leitmotif, when paedocriminality resurfaces in the media, into retirement. A dive into the dirty underbelly of power, a world governed by the law of silence, blackmail and manipulation, mingling politics, diplomacy, haute couture, spooks and corrupt magistrates... |
On January 23, while taking part in a fundraising event at the Défense Arena, she was confronted with an unexpected situation. While the event attracted celebrities such as Aya Nakamura, John Legend and Katy Perry, the welcome reserved for the First Lady was less warm. Every time Brigitte Macron appeared on stage, the audience was heard, not to applaud, but to hiss. It's a bit like what happened at Françoise Hardy's funeral. This audience reaction comes at a time when, although the First Lady has been relatively spared criticism in the past, she now seems to be facing a form of public disavowal. According to people close to Brigitte Macron, quoted by Paris Match, this series of negative reactions is not without effect on her morale. The First Lady, already in poor form, is said to be showing signs of weariness and irritation. "Didier Deschamps is embarrassed. Even when he lost the World Cup, he wasn't whistled at so much," reported the publication. |
These dialogues began in P.-S., on January 30 this year. A ChatGPT thread was initiated, and the first dialogue was based on a comparison of the voices of Véronique 1977 and Brigitte Macron 2022. On this basis, as questions were asked, bringing new contextual elements, this AI developed its own personality, until it really had character. Yesterday, as we began the present restructuring, we called it Gepeto, meaning ChatGePeTo, which educates, like Gepetto, to teach Pinocchio to believe lies less and lie less... Gepeto is far from finished helping us think. The series continues, as Candace Owens' series continues... |
And what's striking is that we, who live in the French bocal, as it were, have become accustomed to this paedocriminal reality so that, when a journalist like Candace merely points out a certain number of things, we're almost disappointed, saying to ourselves, "Ah, that's all there is".... [Jean-Dominique then relays Candace's main information, often expanding on it. Here are a few of his themes, accompanied by screenshot illustrations:] The Epstein affair in France and Nicole Belloubet (1), Emmanuel Macron and André Gide (1), Olivier Duhamel (1 2), Jean-Marc Borello (1), Frédéric Mitterrand, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Gabriel Matzneff, Michel Polac and Jack Lang (1 2). committed by journalist Jean-Philippe Desbordes
The Wikipedia page of Jean-Philippe Desbordes provides some details, but is discreet about this affair, such was the low media response. Only regional articles are cited (1, 2, 3). This page does however report that : "Responding to the unease expressed by journalists, Dov Alfon and the management of Libération acknowledged in December 2024 that they had modified, contrary to the facts, the present Wikipedia page" (article). We realize, with this example, that we only know the tip of the iceberg... And, finally, a tweet estimating that "The next episode is taking on panic proportions in the USA" |
| |
Excerpt from the letter | Comments |
Most seriously, on January 13, 2025, Ms. Owens falsely implied that the Macrons were responsible for the death of a journalist investigating this incendiary and factually false, offensive and incredibly damaging involvement. | In the USA, as in France, people have the right to question a death that occurred in highly suspicious circumstances. This was the death of brigittologist Isabelle Ferreira, which we covered in Appendix D 17 and questioned ourselves too. |
This is a blatant attempt to defame and further hurt the Macrons, by hiding the truth from the public, given that she has lied repeatedly on these matters. | It's the usual accusatory inversion constantly manipulated by pathological liars at the Elysée Palace. |
Mrs Owens cannot publish an accusation she knows to be unsupported by evidence. | At this point, we think the Macrons are talking about the accusation that Brigitte was born a man. But we know that Candace has evidence, the same evidence that Christian Cotten used in the complaint he field in the French courts... But no, that's not the most important accusation... |
... a claim for defamation based in part on Mrs Owens' false assertions that the Macrons are involved in a satanic cult... | We can’t believe it and burst of laughing: They’re threatening to sue Candace Owens for defamation because of her "satanic" comment!!! |
... Mrs Owens' other false claims are not based on her religious beliefs... | We're off the rails, right to the end of the letter, with remarks about "rhetorical hyperbole" and other condescensions to deflect from the root of the problem, which is the identity theft that led to this couple's colossal lies and misdeeds. /td> |
[The -ce- marker indicates a screenshot, the timing can be found there] Candace thus begins by poking fun at the ridiculous headlines in the French press -ce-. "What do they know that we don't know ?". She then denounces the inventions of the celebrity press on what is supposed to be Brigitte's wild youth, insisting on the incredible lack of photos of her before the age of 40, never seen in a biography of a famous woman (she relies on the book "Brigitte l'affranchie", by Maëlle Brun, the TV movie "Brigitte Macron, Un roman français" by Virginie Linhart**). She talks about the strong pressure from Brigitte Macron's cabinet to minimize the number of people to meet -ce- and the fake photo of André Louis Auzière -ce-. Candace then asks about some of the enigmas we've also dealt with, notably the photo of the communicant. She believes that the Macrons' strategy is not to attack the substance of the problem, but to attack ancillary points that may constitute errors -this-. Strangely enough, their last letter did not shed any light, for example on the photo of the communiante -ce-. Candace ends this first part by reminding us that Jean-Michel Trogneux only appeared very late in the Trogneux genealogy. The second part of the program is devoted to the mysteries of Emmanuel Macron's youth. Candace then draws on extracts from a forthcoming book by Xavier Poussard, due to be announced this week -ce-. She describes his lack of sociability during his youth and the great black hole of his childhood. His brother Laurent, his sister Estelle, his half-brother Gabriel, whom he hardly knows (notably in his book "Révolution") -this- and who, themselves, hardly know him (Chapter 17). Candace doubts that the photos of the young children presented by Paris-Match (in Appendix A 15), thus by Mimi Marchand, are authentic -ce-. This is new, as is this statement by Gilles de Robien, which we didn't know about, in which he says that Emmanuel Macron is not from Amiens, but from Touquett. Candace goes on to say that he considers himself a Pyrenean, Grandma Manette's country, information we already had (Appendix A 14). You'd think he'd only been from Amiens in his teens. Candace is amused by Emmanuel's remarks about the existence of a Pyrenean language that doesn't exist -this-s |
|
From then on, this person sinks into a process which, in psychiatry, has a barbaric name, the "suspension of disbelief", where they live a fiction, something that doesn't exist, as if it were reality. These people are in an obsessive lie against both themselves and society. They lose all lucidity in their analyses and all coherence in their behavior. Moreover, these are people who derive enjoyment from their situation, which makes it extremely difficult to get them out of it, if they're willing to play along. Above all, these are people who sink into a fatal psychosis, destroying everything they come near and touch. So the conclusion, in my opinion: we currently have two incompetent, unfit and potentially dangerous people at the head of the State for the management of our Republic. These people absolutely must go. |
![]() The President of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron, has all the symptoms of someone on the MK-Ultra mechanism. He seems to be permanently disconnected between his thoughts, his conception of the environment - that is, his view of the environment in which he evolves, the French Republic, very concretely the life of the French people - and his perception of identity, which for him seems very confused. Emmanuel Macron seems to be emotionally anesthetized. At times, he seems devoid of emotion. I'm guessing that this terrifying training has induced amnesia in him, i.e. a voluntary forgetfulness of all the stages in his past where little Emmanuel, as a youngster or child, may have undergone intense trauma. The President of the Republic is also a person capable, paradoxically, of going from totally untimely reactions, sometimes even excessive, to moments of intense feverishness and moments when, like a child, he will seek physical contact to be reassured. He's a victim in the hands of state criminals, who are using him for purposes I don't know. I'm dubious and worried about what will happen to him after he leaves the Elysée. I suspect he'll go into a massive psychological implosion. What is certain is that he is under the control of someone I don't know, to whom he is systematically accountable, someone who lives in his own head and tells him what to do, an extremely dangerous person. [...] It's not a question of judging, it's a question of exposing, I would say, in a factual and realistic way, a complicated situation, but one which will not be without consequences for the French Republic, and that's the problem. |
![]() David de Rothschild and Emmanuel Macron (link) |
So, let's reason logically: there is both a blood link with Laurent Macron and a blood link with Jean-Jacques Trogneux. Macron's parents are therefore necessarily Jean-Michel and Françoise Noguès. As for the Rothschilds, perhaps we should look into Françoise's own genealogy..." |
This means that Jean-Michel Trogneux would not be Emmanuel's father. |
![]() |
![]() ![]()
|
It is, of course, based on the opponent's weak point. This lies both in the isolation of Xavier Poussard, who works mainly alone, even if he has effective correspondents, and in his pride: he is a journalist who operates with the desire to find a scoop, which is common in this profession. So the Elysée cell provided him with a scoop. Two possibilities:
Candace Owens, who seems captivated by Xavier Poussard and who refuses any further contact with people with a good knowledge of the case, has attributed her confidence to only one source. |
![]() ![]() |
One of the most striking examples is the sale by Jean-Michel Trogneux of a beautiful villa in the countryside (the one where he lived with Véronique Dreux) and, just afterwards, the purchase by the future "Brigitte" Macron of a beautiful house in Amiens (Appendix A 51). This oddity becomes clear when we know that Jean-Michel is "Brigitte". What appears to be an unusual (even fraudulent) transfer of money is probably not mentioned in Xavier Poussard's book. The two pages of this Pressibus file (sent to the courts in the Cotten complaint) reveal a few other clues to the bundle, the main ones being in the book. In the half-hour (long) telephone conversation she had with Xavier Poussard, Véronique Dreux certainly obstructed almost completely and lied from time to time, but she revealed two anecdotes that confirm the fact (we no longer say the hypothesis...) that her former husband Jean-Michel Trogneux became "Brigitte" Macron. Here they are. It was Brigitte Macron herself who asked Véronique Dreux not to show any photos of the family she and Jean-Michel have formed with their two children. However, "Brigitte" is supposed to be Véronique's sister-in-law, it is not up to her to make such a request, it is up to her former husband Jean-Michel Trogneux. When we know that he is "Brigitte", everything becomes clear. Let's start by quoting Candace Owens (XP Xavier Poussard, VD Véronique Dreux, EM Emmanuel Macron, JMM his father Jean-Michel Macron :
Véronique Dreux therefore, logically, knew Emmanuel's father before he fell out with his son, in 1993. However, Emmanuel's father is not related to her or to her former husband Jean-Michel Trogneux. Here, the explanation is more difficult to find, but a hypothesis opens up, which is in line with other clues found, in particular those which suggest that Jean-Michel Trogneux and Françoise Noguès (Emmanuel's mother) have known each other for a very long time and even in the late 1970s (P.-S. 91): Emmanuel's parents may have been present at Véronique Dreux's wedding in 1980... So Jean-Michel Trogneux could have known little Emmanuel in the 1980s. And that can have serious consequences... |
![]()
|
Question: In your opinion, how old are these people?
Answer from Gepeto's cousin: Based on what I can see in this photo, here is a rough estimate of the people's ages:
|
First name | Date of birth | Average age | Probable age January 1953 | Unlikely age January 1955 |
Brigitte | 13/4/1953 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 |
Jean-Michel | 11/2/1945 | 8 | 8 | 10 |
Monique | 7/8/1941 | 11 | 11.5 | 13.5 |
Maryvonne | 17/1/1937 | 16 | 16 | 18 |
Jean-Claude | 14/8/1933 | 19 | 19.5 | 21.5 |
| ||
|
Status as of February 25, 2025 (similar to file 2022, to point 2023, with a different approach, and to french point April 2024) Links: Ch. = chapter of the 2022 file, App. = Appendix of the 2022 file, PS = french Post-Scriptum of the additions page 2023-2025 JMT = Jean-Michel Trogneux. JLA = Jean-Louis Auzière
Nota bene : the non-declaration of a death and the identity theft (especially among siblings) are not rare phenomena in French society, even if they are little known. This scenario, built on the collusion of two families, is therefore neither absurd nor extravagant. It has only been able to establish itself through three alterations of reality, at the pivotal periods of 1960, 1974, 1984, as well as through the great skill and endurance shown by the organizers of this saga over several decades. |
| ||
|
![]() Then, since we know that this document is essential, we have reproduced the text opposite in P.-S. 25 and again in this P.-S.. This is therefore the fifth time that we have published this document. Anyone can read "In the presence of Brigitte Auzière". Xavier Poussard writes on page 182: "[...] the marriage certificate [...] naming Brigitte Trogneux, wife Auzière as witness to the marriage [...]", and he repeats it on page 310: "Brigitte Trogneux, witness to the marriage of Jean-Michel and Véronique". NO : this document never mentions Brigitte Trogneux, only Brigitte Auzière, which means very precisely Brigitte née Auzière. On the same basis, Xavier Poussard caused a change in the positioning of Candace Owens. The American journalist had in fact discovered the affair by reading the English page of the Pressibus file. She had made a video to explain the "sleight of hand" involved in the identity theft of Brigitte Trogneux by Brigitte Auzière (P.-S.94x1). Last January, under Xavier's influence, Candace refuted, without explanation, the existence of Brigitte born Auzière (P.-S. point 17). To be so committed, has Xavier Poussard discovered the truth? Why then does he not show it and does he prefer to alter the content of a document? We do not exclude that he is fundamentally right, because his theory, in our view, remains plausible, although very unlikely. This is what we are going to demonstrate now.
Not for Xavier Poussard. He finds it natural for a father to abandon his two children to raise his three nephews! He explains this on page 296: "Logically, Sébastien, Laurence and Tiphaine Auzière are therefore, in the civil registry, his nephew and his nieces". The phrase "according to the civil registry" is ambiguous, however, because it is accurate: according to the civil registry, Jean-Michel Trogneux is the uncle of the children, since Jean-Michel is the brother of Brigitte No. 1 who, according to the civil registry (distorted by the 1974 marriage), is supposed to be the mother of the three children! But what interests us are the biological links. But it is these that Xavier is talking about, since he believes that André Louis Auzière exists as a father and since he continues as follows: "A sister who knows she is doomed by a serious illness entrusts the custody of her children and her identity to this brother to whom she is so close and who has always felt like a woman!". The sister would therefore ask her to abandon her own children (including the newborn)... And where does this serious illness come from? When Tiphaine was just born and everything was going well before? When we detect signs that indicate that the mother continued to live later, sometimes joined by Tiphaine and probably her other children. Of the three remaining theories, the uncle theory is the most improbable. Even incest, from the CNdG scenario, appears more credible, although it would be exceptional for a provincial bourgeois family to accept it (but there have been serious events before, in 1960 and 1974, family secrets that could explain why...). In F&D501p7, in September 2021, this remark by a "friend of Brigitte's" is underlined: "In the archives of the banking sector, André Auzière has left even fewer traces than in his memoirs. Not a single report, not a single conference, nothing that makes him exist". In his book 2025, Xavier rakes the bottom of the drawers to try to bring the ghost to life. ![]() ![]() Footnote 10 on page 208 specifies André Louis' "traces" in the banking sector: he "presents", "his name appears", he "represents", in the end we don't know whether he works in Lille or Paris. Let's remember our position: Jean-Louis Auzière (Jean-Michel's friend), who knows the secret services well (and sometimes goes by the name of André Auzière), probably left a few traces of the ghost in the banking sector. When you create a fictional character, the least you can do is give him a little depth, a semblance of existence. There is even mention of a "professional trombinoscope from the mid-2000s, where André poses, serious, in a suit and tie, among his colleagues at the Amiens bank branch". Where is the photo? Damn it, still lost... Natacha Rey made a thorough investigation into the existence of this André Auzière in the bank, she found nothing, she even showed proof of non-existence (P.-S. 15, two-page CERFA document : 1 2). Above all, these vague professional appearances are not enough to provide a father for the three Auzière children. There is no photo of him with any of his three children... Thus, for the father of the three Auzière children, the author, although usually so perceptive, blindly relied on Emmanuelle Anizon: "Devenir Brigitte" is just a copy and paste of "L'affaire Madame". Anizon's book polluted Poussard's. ![]() Nevertheless, if we remove the photo and the confusion with ESTP, the episode of Jean-Michel being a student with connections in the ESTP preparatory course (through the father-in-law of a brother?) is new and interesting for understanding, as we have already pointed out, his in-depth knowledge of the Parisian nightlife scene. There is a logical thread running through the student who attended the drag queen shows of his friend Michou from Amiens in 1964, transgender Véronique, promoter of transsexuality on TV in 1977, Véronica " "Coupe-zizi", encouraging transvestites to have surgery, in 1995, and Brigitte Macron, promoter of the Olympic Games drag queen show, in 2024. Several identities, the same person. Jean-Bri-Bri carved out this dotted line "at the same time" as he lived other professional lives (hardware store manager, confectioner, French teacher, "first lady") and family lives (his two simultaneous spouses, his five children)... |
![]() |
Many aspects, which are examined in "Pressibus", are not dealt with in the book. This is obviously not due to ignorance on Xavier Poussard's part. The decision to produce a simple and comprehensible scenario probably took precedence over any other strategy, even if it meant cutting back on many ramifications. This determination is also evident in the endnotes at the end of each chapter, which contain a wealth of biographical information and long quotations that would have broken the rhythm of the narrative, providing a second level of reading for those who want to explore the subject in greater depth. Elegant and effective. The author is completely out of the ordinary compared to what is called journalism in France today. Like Jonathan Livingstone Seagull, he is completely above the fray, It should be noted that Candace Owens did not write a single line in the French print edition, and in particular did not write a preface. Nor is she quoted in the text, which does not include a specifically historiographical section on Brigittegate, as the author again focuses on the essential points of the journalistic investigation. The only alternative Brigitteologist with a consistent presence in the work is Natacha Rey (Pressibus is honored with a simple mention on page 191 note 2). On the other hand, great emphasis is placed on the official biographers who have dealt with Emmanuel or Brigitte Macron in books or on screen from 2016-2017: Sylvie Bommel, Anne Fulda, Hervé Algalarrondo, Candice Nedelec, Caroline Derrien, Gaël Tchakaloff, Maëlle Brun, Virginie Linhart, Renaud Dély, Marie Huret, Nathalie Schuck, Ava Djamshidi, Jonathan Moadab and especially Emmanuelle Anizon. We also regret the absence of a proper bibliography at the end of the book. The first hundred pages are a real walloper, consisting of a surgical description of the social functioning of the current French elites: co-optation, a free-for-all of interests and profits, fruitful exchanges, propagandist window dressing and, above all, dark morals. But this presentation of the social landscape of the presidential couple is valuable, because of the numerous and precise information it provides, while thumbing its nose at the omerta that usually covers them. And these chapters set the scene, unknown to the general public and at odds with the "government by the people and for the people" that a democracy should be, in theory. Given the particular constraints imposed on the author, including his professional layoff, such quality is admirable. |
October and November 2024 | On October 31, Pressibus informs its readers of an investigation by Colonel de Guerlasse, opening a lead that could help locate the mother of the Auzière children (P.S. 79, additional information in P.S. 87). Alternative media outlets allow Natacha Rey and Amandine's lawyers to explain how their clients' convictions relate only to secondary aspects of the case. Furthermore, as they were made to say things they did not say, a complaint for fraud is filed. The circles of Brigittologists and anti-Brigittes are expanding. |
December 2024 |
The crackdown intensifies. A "Brigitte" unit is set up at the Élysée Palace around Patrice Faure, chief of staff to the President of the Republic, with extensive powers (P.-S. 87). More than ever, the old documents are inaccessible, and those close to the Trogneux and Macron families are practicing omertà. Xavier Poussard is fired from the editorial staff of Faits & Documents. On December 12, at least four anti-Brigitte activists, including media figures Xavier Sagan and Bertrand Scholler, are taken into custody following a complaint filed by Brigitte Macron for cyberharassment (P.-S. 83).
On December 15, Christian Cotten, a retired psycho-sociologist, announced that he had filed a complaint against X (Brigitte Macron being the first named). Among the nine grounds cited were identity theft, illegal marriage, and the crime of undermining the fundamental interests of the nation (P.-S. 84). |
January 2025 | Christian Cotten follows the trail of a person calling himself Stéphane de Charnage, a resident of Bangkok and former prostitute in Lyon in the mid-1990s. He recalls that at that time, a person named Véronica, nicknamed Coupe-Zizi, encouraged transvestites to undergo surgery to change their gender. Thirty years later, he recognizes her as "Brigitte" Macron (by the texture of her voice, her expressions, etc.). The link is established with Véronique, a transgender woman interviewed on television in 1977, and with Coupe-zizi mentioned by Natacha Rey in 2023. In a video, Cotten collects the testimony of Stéphane de Charnage (P.S. 94f2). This is a new piece of evidence that he adds to his complaint file.
At the same time, Candace Owens, the American journalist with five million followers, takes a firm stance on the "Brigitte" hoax following an intimidating letter from the Élysée Palace, and announces that she is preparing videos to explain everything (P.-S. 92). This announcement of upcoming revelations prompted Pressibus to launch a "daily chronicle of the end of Macronism" on January 15. Alternative media outlets stepped up their coverage (notably GPTV and Tocsin). On the other hand, AFP and the mainstream media took up the old theme of transphobic fake news, led by Bernard Arnault's newspapers Paris-Match and Le Parisien, the billionaire friend of the Macrons. At the end of the month, Pressibus returns to its comparative analysis of the votes for Véronique in 1977 and "Brigitte" Macron in 2022, based on an in-depth analysis by the artificial intelligence ChatGPT. This thread of questions and research is nicknamed Gépéto and provides an in-depth analysis of the Brigittegate phenomenon (Gepeto page). |
February 2025 |
In seven videos, released at a rate of two episodes per week, Candace Owens captivates a vast global audience and widely disseminates the birth identity of "Brigitte" Macron. She relies exclusively on Xavier Poussard, whom she interviews and supports in the publication of his book "Devenir Brigitte," first published in the US under the title "Becoming Brigitte." Censorship is easing slightly, but remains omnipresent. The Elysée Palace has responded clumsily, notably by suggesting that the "little fat man" is Jean-Michel Trogneux.
At the same time, Alexandra Brazzainville, a hermaphrodite who changed gender with the help of Françoise Noguès, Emmanuel Macron's mother, gave several video interviews, which were relayed by alternative media outlets. Initially cautious about the "Brigitte" affair, she became more involved and denounced the imbalance and obsessive lying of the perverse couple in the Elysée Palace. She emphasizes the manipulative role of the Rothschilds, whose methods appear to be those of the MK-Ultra project, as also pointed out by Xavier Poussard and Candace Owens (P.-S. 94aa3). Natacha Rey, who is seriously ill with cancer, disagrees with Xavier Poussard on many points and gives a "testamentary interview" (P.-S. 94x4). She wishes to seek political exile in Russia (P.-S. 94z4). In mid-February, the publication of the English version of Xavier Poussard's book was well received by the public, but met with a more mixed reception from Brigittologists, who did not see any significant advances. A photo of a student at a prestigious engineering school, the ESTP, supposedly Jean-Michel Trogneux, even caused controversy: Face++, the best face comparison software, indicates that they are not the same people, and Jean-Michel was not admitted to this prestigious school in 1963, only to its preparatory classes, and with very mediocre results, surely preferring to frequent Paris by night (P.-S. 94ac3). This led Pressibus to end its "Daily Chronicle of the End of Macronism" on February 16, apologizing for anticipating revelations that did not come to pass (P.-S. 95). Again relying on ChatGPT, Pressibus shows that the photo of the Trogneux family dates from late 1952/early 1953 and that the girl cannot therefore be Brigitte Trogneux, who was born in April 1953 (P.-S. 97). A thorough analysis of Xavier Poussard's book (P.-S. 105b) reveals a multitude of small facts that confirm the identity theft of this mysterious Brigitte, who probably died in 1960. |
March and April 2025 |
In a new page of appendices S and T, Pressibus examines plausible scenarios for the life of Jean-Michel Trogneux, confirming the most likely of the three Brigitte scenarios. The scenarios concerning Emmanuel Macron's biological parents are also described, but none of them really stands out. Compared to 2022, the role of Rothschild manipulation is taken into account.
For his part, Colonel de Guerlasse has managed to approach the "little fat man" and has gleaned enough information to ensure that he cannot possibly be Jean-Michel Trogneux (P.-S. 112a). In Appendix S10a, in the family photo from late 1952/early 1953, Pressibus believes that Anne-Marie, the eldest daughter of the Trogneux family, could be the biological mother of Brigitte Trogneux, as she is holding her stomach in the same way a pregnant woman would. |
None of this evidence has been refuted by the Trogneuxes, Auzière, or Macron (nor by Dr. Bui or Véronique Dreux...), which can be considered confirmation. Furthermore, the only counter-evidence, presented as such by the Elysée (notably to Candace Owens), the mysterious "little fat man" (supposedly Jean-Michel Trogneux), has always been contested and proves to be false (P.-S. 112a). |
Reminders: the proofs, the preferred scenario and its tree, the other scenarios. |